Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If I remember archeology has evidence or artifacts from about 30 groups of people living in that part of the world at that point of time. Archaeology and the bible is a huge subject that huge amounts of time and effort has gone into.Eh, that's kinda pushing it. If Adam and Eve were just any two random humans (the only version of the story that works with what we know from genetics) and not the progenitors of all of humanity, then there's no particular reason to believe we'd find sources of their existence. After all, why would they be important?
Eh, that's kinda pushing it. If Adam and Eve were just any two random humans (the only version of the story that works with what we know from genetics) and not the progenitors of all of humanity, then there's no particular reason to believe we'd find sources of their existence. After all, why would they be important?
There is a science Adam and Eve that was featured on the cover of time magazine. There are many Edens like we find in the Bible. There are sufficient books written about the domestication of plants and animals in the middle east. China had its own "Eden" in the yellow river area. This is where rice was domesticated along with Asian vegetables. East and West were eventually connected by trade along the silk road. A road that is of course still there today. It's interesting to look at the photos people are taking there today.Why? If they were 40 thousand years old and the garden site under water then we wouldn't expect to find anything.
There is a science Adam and Eve that was featured on the cover of time magazine. There are many Edens like we find in the Bible. There are sufficient books written about the domestication of plants and animals in the middle east. China had its own "Eden" in the yellow river area. This is where rice was domesticated along with Asian vegetables. East and West were eventually connected by trade along the silk road. A road that is of course still there today. It's interesting to look at the photos people are taking there today.
Adam and Eve represent man becoming a farmer food producer rather than a hunter gather. There is sufficient evidence that farming began in the middle east and spread to the world from there. They call this the fertile crescent.In my theology Adam and Eve were installed on our old evolved earth as the worlds new visible spiritual rulers. Had they not defaulted the world would be a very different place.
Gobekli could have been prostitution. In the Bible they were warned to stay away from places like that. This is an extremely significant scientific find many thousands of years before Adam and Eve. There is no evidence of any people living there at the time. These people are still campers hunter gathers.
Gobekli could have been prostitution. In the Bible they were warned to stay away from places like that. This is an extremely significant scientific find many thousands of years before Adam and Eve. There is no evidence of any people living there at the time. These people are still campers hunter gathers.
First we look at who the Bible was written for. Then we look at the message in the Bible for us and our generation today.the audience was the more child like mind of Bronze Age sheep herders. It was pseudo biographical, by Hebrews for Hebrews.
I find plenty of evidence. I especially like to study the abundance of evidence science provides for us.If Adam and Eve were real and literal, then you should be able to find evidence outside of the Bible.
says who ? who made that rule ? can you prove it ? it is a silly bias based rule . .. evolution remains utterly unproven being itself based upon a chosen belief system .Nope. Burden of proof lies with those making a positive claim.
It's just a logical rule.says who ? who made that rule ? can you prove it ? it is a silly bias based rule . .. evolution remains utterly unproven being itself based upon a chosen belief system .
but God is and was and ever shall be far long after the memory of you is gone and all evidence that you existed on the earth forgotten .
well i find no reason to accept evolution and i move onneither scientist nor creationist is required to prove that the moon isn't full of goat monsters... we just say that there's no reason to accept that fact and move on.
i was being tongue in cheek but as said so often just because a large number say something ,it doesn't automatically make it correct. but we are Christians ,one who beleive in God (though some are dubious in that ) and there is (though some refuse to admit it ) such a thing as a true christian and a false christian ..false are known by failure to remain christian .The entire western judicial system, for starters.
Which is why I then listed the evidence.well i find no reason to accept evolution and i move on![]()
Right.i don't believe your partial incomplete unprovable evidence and i move on![]()