Whether a fossil had offspring or not doesn't matter, since populations evolve, not individuals, a fossil is a snap shot of a population at a certain time.
MatthewM said:Personally I think there are no transitional fossils and if there were any then they cannot prove evolution. The reason why fossils can't prove evolution is because if you look at a fossil, you don't know if it had any offspring let alone different offspring, so fossils can't be used as proof. Fossils also could prove that there was a world wide flood. The problem with the evidence for both theories is that it depends what way you interpret the evidence and although its the same evidence both parties look at them differently.
Upvote
0