justlookinla
Regular Member
You're continually trying to equate evolution with Darwinist evolution. They're two very different views.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It would indeed be fallacious to claim that if it is beautiful, simple, or elegant, then it must be true. Fortunately, "evolutionists" (i.e., scientists) don't claim that. We know it to be true because the evidence supports it, not because it is beautiful, simple, or elegant.
Yeah, how about that!You're wanting someone to answer a question you asked? How about that!!
No, no they're not.You're continually trying to equate evolution with Darwinist evolution. They're two very different views.
Yeah, how about that!
No, no they're not.
Have you ever heard of Kat Kerr? She talks about going to heaven and seeing things like candy houses that the kids can eat or play around. Just like the story of the ginger bread house. I do not care if things like that are true or not. It's just fun to think about. Its called an allegory that reveals truth that can be reviled in no other way. I got a dentist that likes to build great big elaborate candy houses. He spends many hundreds of hours on one with all the intricate details. So does an adventure park like that actually exist in Heaven? No way to know sense we do not know for sure if there even is a Heaven. But if there is then something like that is nice to think about. I am not to much into hell fire and brimstone. Besides if I want to see that all I got to do is turn on the 6 o'clock news and see all I would want to see.You are kidding me, right?
Evolution meaning which everyone agrees with is variation which is just used as a distraction.
ToE claims there is no taxonomic limit to variation.
Atheistic evolution is universal common descent plus naturalism , nature is all there is.
I was actually talking to a medical doctor at the time. The people were busy strapping a helmet on the kids head so he would not hurt himself. My wife's nephew was having seizures and I determined that it was shaky brain syndrome from his auntie throwing him up in the air. We told her to stop and somewhere along they way the doctor took him off the medication. He actually is doing ok now. A lot more intelligent then I thought he was going to be.I see no reason to believe that there are demons at all.
I would strongly urge you to encourage anyone who has seizures to seek medical assistance.
Everyone agrees with micro evolution. They do not agree on macro evolution.Evolution meaning which everyone agrees with is variation which is just used as a distraction.
I have deep faith that the principle of the universe will be beautiful and simple.It would indeed be fallacious to claim that if it is beautiful, simple, or elegant, then it must be true. Fortunately, "evolutionists" (i.e., scientists) don't claim that. We know it to be true because the evidence supports it, not because it is beautiful, simple, or elegant.
Oh sure anyone can answer a question they have asked. The real challenge is to answer the question before they ask itYou're wanting someone to answer a question you asked? How about that!!
Oh sure anyone can answer a question they have asked. The real challenge is to answer the question before they ask it
Could be a weakness in the software. When I click on "alerts" the system does not keep track of what responses I have clicked on. So it is possible that people could miss one every now and then.I had asked the questioner a question in another thread and he immediately went into evasion mode and still hasn't answered it, yet he wishes for his questions to be answered.
Kinda a double standard.
Could be a weakness in the software. When I click on "alerts" the system does not keep track of what responses I have clicked on. So it is possible that people could miss one every now and then.
Exactly. Someone who believe in naturalism will naturally believe in macro-evolution no matter how much evidence stand against it.The dominating factor in whether one agrees that macro evolution takes place, has nothing to do with understanding the science and or evidence and everything to do with their personal faith belief.
Exactly evolutionists can present no evidence. So their belief in Macro Evolution is based on their personal faith and belief. Esp when the whole theory hinges on a mutations theory. It takes a LOT of faith to believe that something good comes out of mistakes and errors. In fact the whole bio diverse biosphere is said to be a product of mutations.The dominating factor in whether one agrees that macro evolution takes place, has nothing to do with understanding the science and or evidence and everything to do with their personal faith belief.
Exactly evolutionists can present no evidence. So their belief in Macro Evolution is based on their personal faith and belief. Esp when the whole theory hinges on a mutations theory. It takes a LOT of faith to believe that something good comes out of mistakes and errors. In fact the whole bio diverse biosphere is said to be a product of mutations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?