justlookinla
Regular Member
Your guesses and suppositions of how bacterial flagellum and tactile sensory units were formed.
How are designed elements products of naturalistic processes?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What guesses and suppositions?
Already shown to be produced by natural processes.
Your guesses and suppositions of how bacterial flagellum and tactile sensory units were formed.
How are designed elements products of naturalistic processes?
Position envy? That really did make me laugh. You seem to be forgetting that your belief is based on very general evidence and rhetoric. You accept stories about theories that try to explain what is observed.I understand your need to project. You have position "envy," as I'm able to adjust my beliefs to the evidence, and you're stuck with the bible. This should be simple enough for you to understand; I accept the theories that best explain what we're able to observe.
I, make three basic assumptions:
1. Realty exists.
2. We can learn something about reality.
3. Models with predictive capabilities work better than those without.
Position envy? That really did make me laugh. You seem to be forgetting that your belief is based on very general evidence and rhetoric. You accept stories about theories that try to explain what is observed.
You do realize that my four year old grandson does this same thing all the time. It clearly indicates that you are at a loss and must revert to the equivalent, "my dog is better than yours", "no my dog is better than yours".So you are saying that ID is guesses and suppositions?
You do realize that my four year old grandson does this same thing all the time. It clearly indicates that you are at a loss and must revert to the equivalent, "my dog is better than yours", "no my dog is better than yours".
I have no problem with evolution as biological defined. It becomes a problem things are claimed about it that are not in evidence. I have a problem more with materialists/atheists using science and evolution as a explanation of all life forms and systems therein when there is no physical evidence to show that and what evidence there is supports these life forms and systems appear to be designed with a purpose.Then what exactly is your problem with the theory of evolution?
The evidence is for design, it is not for a blind, purposeless process with no goals or plans.If all we have left are guesses and suppositions, then wouldn't that make ID a guess and/or supposition?
I have no problem with evolution as biological defined. It becomes a problem things are claimed about it that are not in evidence.
The evidence is for design, it is not for a blind, purposeless process with no goals or plans.
The evidence is that it appears designed with a purpose. That is the evidence, when are you all going to get that?Yet you have no problem with the claim that bacterial flagella are designed when you have zero evidence to back it.
The evidence that shows that life forms and systems appear to be designed for a purpose.What evidence?
To more accurately reflect what you're trying to say here; "I believe what I see in life forms and systems appears to be designed for a purpose, and I will consider what I see as evidence because I believe in a god I think is intelligent."The evidence that shows that life forms and systems appear to be designed for a purpose.
The evidence that shows that life forms and systems appear to be designed for a purpose.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?