• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

evolution and the devil

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
davyuk said:
By your own admission, whatever the answer may be you won't accept it if it contradicts your Bible. Do you feel that wave of ignorance wash over you?


A week is a week no matter who/what you are. You'll learn that the Bible was written specifically to be understood by us mere mortals, and a week to us is 7, 24hr days.

Since your moniker indicates that you are an atheist, just what are you doing trying to dictate to Christians how they should interpret the Bible? Do you allow creationists to dictate the definitions of "evoluition", "microevolution", "macroevolution", and "natural selection"? NO. Because they define them for their own benefit.

Here the benefit is that a literal interpretation of the Bible is the only interpretation atheists can falsify. Having you insist that a literal interpretation is the only interpretation is no more valid than creationists telling us what evolution is.

the physical state of planet Earth so that all possible evidence points towards the planet being 11ish billion years

And where do you get your data? The earth is only 4.5 billion years old. The universe is 13.7 billion.

pretty strong evidence that humans were anatomically different over 30,000 years ago,

Bad data again. Cro-Magnon is 30,000 years ago and is fully anatomically modern.

Your book was written by humans who had little understanding of such sciences and made stuff up that's now so painfully wrong that Christians have to now make up lame and laughable excuses for the errors.

The authors of Genesis 1 set their theological message in the best science of the time -- the Babylonian. However, the theological messages are just as valid in today's science as they were then.
 
Upvote 0

Late_Cretaceous

<font color="#880000" ></font&g
Apr 4, 2002
1,965
118
Visit site
✟25,525.00
Faith
Catholic
Wow, that's deep.
Fossil evidence is probably the weakest link in the theory of evolution. More compelling evidence can be found in DNA, developmental biology, ecology, biogeography and mathematics (population studies). Not to mention direct observation of speciation.

Fossils do give us a beautiful, if fragmentary, history of life on earth - but do not give much insight into the mechanisms of evolution
 
Upvote 0

davyuk

You can call me Sir.
Jul 11, 2003
465
20
53
Oxford, UK
Visit site
✟693.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
UK-Labour
lucaspa said:
Since your moniker indicates that you are an atheist, just what are you doing trying to dictate to Christians how they should interpret the Bible?
I did no such thing. And in any case it is as valid that an atheist give interpretation to a Christian, as a Christian to another Christian.

Do you allow creationists to dictate the definitions of "evoluition", "microevolution", "macroevolution", and "natural selection"? NO. Because they define them for their own benefit.
Interpretations ... definitions. Not the same surely?

Here the benefit is that a literal interpretation of the Bible is the only interpretation atheists can falsify. Having you insist that a literal interpretation is the only interpretation is no more valid than creationists telling us what evolution is.
Can you really interpret evolution? I'm learning here ... my mind is open.

And where do you get your data? The earth is only 4.5 billion years old. The universe is 13.7 billion.
My bad. I confused the figures in my head (and I used an 'ish' after a billion figure!) No excuses there.

Bad data again. Cro-Magnon is 30,000 years ago and is fully anatomically modern.
Which is why I used 'over 30,000 ya' - CM is our last point of reference.

The authors of Genesis 1 set their theological message in the best science of the time -- the Babylonian. However, the theological messages are just as valid in today's science as they were then.
The theological message is not the issue here, creation is.
 
Upvote 0