- Mar 9, 2006
- 11,279
- 1,082
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
thanks for the reply.
I think that the "all the men of the city" part reinforces the amount wickedness that was prevalent there. Hence why the angels were there in the first place, and also with Abraham's pleading to God if a prerequisite amount of righteous were to be found there.
This has nothing to do with sodom and gomorrah, unless you contend that they wished to wage war with the angels of God (and had defeated them already).
I'm not sure why you keep referring to same sex monogamous relationships, im speaking of same-sex sex in general.Nothing needs to be defended. I don't see this as a blanket condemnation of same sex, monogamous relationships.
Since Lot offered up his daughters as a 'substitute', it does help clarify their intentions.There is also a lot of debate over what they really wanted to do with the angels, but the word "yada" is used (Bring them out to us so that we may "know" them), which has been interpreted as "violent rape".
As it says, "all the men surrounded the house, both young and old". To assume that ALL the men from the city are homosexual, is quite unbelievable. Homosexuals have always accounted for a minority of the population.
I think that the "all the men of the city" part reinforces the amount wickedness that was prevalent there. Hence why the angels were there in the first place, and also with Abraham's pleading to God if a prerequisite amount of righteous were to be found there.
It was relatively common back then for the victorious army to rape high-ranking leaders of the defeated foe.
This has nothing to do with sodom and gomorrah, unless you contend that they wished to wage war with the angels of God (and had defeated them already).
Upvote
0