- May 29, 2012
- 41,108
- 24,136
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And what did they offer him?Donald is a businessman. He had business deals with the Russians both before and during his campaign. What did he offer them?
The special prosecutor was appointed - by Donald's own DOJ - to investigate if members of Donald's campaign were colluding with the Russian government or its agents, not necessarily Donald himself (only if evidence pointed to him). One mightI think most people recognize the Russians were messing around in the election. Like I said they've probably been doing it for years! What most of us are questioning is the Trump Russian collusion to affect the election.
Perhaps I misunderstand you. Are you saying that the investigation had nothing to do with a Trump/Russia collusion issue?
Donald is a businessman. He had business deals with the Russians both before and during his campaign. What did he offer them?
Kudos. Some of your fellow travelers think it's fine if foreign powers interfere with our elections because "we do it too".
The Mueller investigation is about Russian interference in the election and the possible involvement of Americans in it, including members of Trump's campaign. Have you never read Mueller's orders?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
It never was specifically about Trump himself.
Yes I have. And even though there isn't a specific "let's get Trump" statement in there it's obvious what they are after.
The Trump campaign is to elect Trump and people are hoping that the investigation will get Trump. You've been reading the posts haven't you? What about the headlines? Man I could post article after article about this. The Trump/Russian collusion is the big hope for everyone. It's everywhere. It"s all over this thread alone. You'd have to be blind or in willful denial not to see it.
No, it's not. If you were paying attention you would have seen on this board alone many "lefties" (including me) express disbelief at the idea of "collusion." The notion that the Mueller investigation is nothing but a "witch hunt" to "get Trump" for "collusion" is pure, unadulterated right-wing misdirection.Yes I have. And even though there isn't a specific "let's get Trump" statement in there it's obvious what they are after. The Trump campaign is to elect Trump and people are hoping that the investigation will get Trump. You've been reading the posts haven't you? What about the headlines? Man I could post article after article about this. The Trump/Russian collusion is the big hope for everyone. It's everywhere. It"s all over this thread alone. You'd have to be blind or in willful denial not to see it.
I think so. The "Trump Right" is all about ideological loyalty and they can't imagine the rest of us being any other way.
Who makes up "they"?
Very well. Since it is so obvious perhaps you would be kind enough to point out a couple of examples from this thread?
Post 37, 49, 51, 61.
Why would you think that? Do you imagine some are so weak willed that uf "one of theirs" is on the screen they'll watch?
Patience, friend, patience.
Hear here!
In fact I think, that Mueller has the goods on 45 (in still sealed indictments pending before the courts). We will never see those indictments as they will be held to ensure that either Trump doesn’t run, my preference, or is convinced to eat a baby* on the campaign trial so that the only people who vote for him are investigated immediately!
*or some other equally horrific thing that will turn off “moderates”.
And what did they offer him?
I think I'm done with this conversation. Like I said if you can't see it, then you are blind.
Here is just one of MANY MANY articles on the Trump/Russia collusion issue.
Mark Warner says there's 'enormous' evidence of Russia-Trump collusion
So, it's no "spin".
You clearly misinterpreted my post. I am saying the investigation is not finished. I have said in other posts that I am not in the “collusion” camp.Post 37, 49, 51, 61.
I think I'm done with this conversation. Like I said if you can't see it, then you are blind.
Here is just one of MANY MANY articles on the Trump/Russia collusion issue.
Mark Warner says there's 'enormous' evidence of Russia-Trump collusion
So, it's no "spin".
Post 37, 49, 51, 61.
Okay then.I think I'm done with this conversation. Like I said if you can't see it, then you are blind.
The article is talking about evidence. It's really not a smear job.Here is just one of MANY MANY articles on the Trump/Russia collusion issue.
Mark Warner says there's 'enormous' evidence of Russia-Trump collusion
“They offer that dirt. There is an acceptance of that offer in writing from the president’s son, Don Jr., and there is overt acts and furtherance of that… That to me is direct evidence," Schiff added.
So, it's no "spin".
I fail to see how any of these are evidence that people are out to get Trump via the Russian investigation. People believing there is evidence is the exact opposite of "Witch Hunt".
Yet again, this does not strike me as evidence people are fabricating evidence in order to "get Trump". Quite frankly it looks to me that you are seeing things that are not there which is why you think everyone else is blind.
Indeed. That would seem to be the case.you guys all crack me up! You want Mueller to get Trump and hope he does. All those things I showed you you were veiled statements by the writers all hinting at Trump Russian collusion. Of course none of you have any power to get Trump. But you sure show your bias in believing there was collusion. The posts here proove it.
And I could spend a lot of time researching the news and TV commentary and posting links, but quite frankly it wouldn't do any good. People are just in blind denial. Oh well. I guess we'll just wait and see.
I either missed or else totally forgot about the first.Secondly
His show is opinion-based. Many similar shows are. He's hardly unique in that respect.Hannity is not a legitimate journalist, he is a talk show host, an entertainer as he acknowledges whenever he is caught lying.
Even if they document their sources?Talk show hosts and entertainers are not reputable sources.
That's a rather common turn of phrase in that business.Did you catch the part where Hannity repeatedly says "breaking news" as if he is a news broadcaster?
Are you suggesting he doesn't have sources?Did you catch the part where he says "according to my sources" as if he is an investigative reporter?
Except he documents the sources he used for his presentation there.He doesn't have any sources
There's more than one meaning for the word "source". I trust you're aware of that and that you're not deliberately obfuscating the point.he first regurgitates quotes from The Daily Caller(another documented disseminator of lies).
Ah, so you did watch the video then?Then Hannity claims to be quoting from the FISA application but proceeds to read from a guest editorial for The Hill.
What did he claim was listed on the FISA application which isn't?Instead Hannity quotes from another opinion piece making the same distorted claim, while Hannity claims to be quoting the FISA application!
You've used quite a lot of name-calling and innuendo in your post here.a dose of name-calling and innuendo
I'm get back to you with more levels of your delusion and I'll leave you with this...
If you have so much inside info on what's really going under the surface, so much esoteric knowledge, such a penetrating intellect not to be duped like the masses, the sheep, then why are all your sources documented serial liars and talk show host jesters?
Is every legitimate journalist and academic on the planet part of the grand conspiracy to conceal and perpetuate the "deep state"... think about it...
If you have so much inside info on what's really going under the surface, so much esoteric knowledge, such a penetrating intellect not to be duped like the masses, the sheep, then why are all your sources documented serial liars and talk show host jesters?
Is every legitimate journalist and academic on the planet part of the grand conspiracy to conceal and perpetuate the "deep state"... think about it...
But discovering that some members of Trump's campaign may have had illicit dealings with Russia doesn't "get Trump."Yes I have. And even though there isn't a specific "let's get Trump" statement in there it's obvious what they are after. The Trump campaign is to elect Trump and people are hoping that the investigation will get Trump. You've been reading the posts haven't you? What about the headlines? Man I could post article after article about this. The Trump/Russian collusion is the big hope for everyone. It's everywhere. It"s all over this thread alone. You'd have to be blind or in willful denial not to see it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?