Yes and no. Gradyll started a side branch of the thread which drifted from the topic. My posts to him had resulted in the termination of that OT branch, until you decided to revive it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then you are off topic, aren't you?
But look who I used that reasoning with.....
When in Rome, learn to speak Italian.
Besides, I am one Christian talking to another about an area of theology. I use quite different arguments concerning science.
obviosly not complete but that the ALL major phyla showed up from no where, and have not gone away since.
its' a problem because of this:
Dr. Paul Chien is chairman of the biology department at the University of San Francisco. He has extensively explored the mysteries of the marvelous Cambrian fossils in Chengjiang, China. Moreover, Chien possesses the largest collection of Chinese Cambrian fossils in North America. In an interview with Real Issue he remarked, A simple way of putting it is that currently we have about 38 phyla of different groups of animals, but the total number of phyla discovered during that period of time (including those in China, Canada, and elsewhere) adds up to over 50 phyla. That means [there are] more phyla in the very, very beginning, where we found the first fossils [of animal life], than exist now. Stephen J. Gould, [a Harvard University evolutionary biologist], has referred to this as the reverse cone of diversity. The theory of evolution implies that things get more and more complex and get more and more diverse from one single origin. But the whole thing turns out to be reversed. We have more diverse groups in the very beginning, and in fact more and more of them die off over time, and we have less and less now.- from genesispark.com
Darwin's Dilemma - YouTube
it is difficult for athiests to reconcile science and faith as being mutually exclusive and yet still be adhered to.
something like that.
(not that the Bible isn't scientific, it definately has some science in it)
I disagree. Atheists typically claim that scientific findings have nothing to do with whether their is a God or not and science is not concerned with this question.
Certainly, a guy like Francis Collins, who is a devout christian, has no problem stating science does not interfere with faith and can still state he is convinced the evidence to support evolution is staggering.
Scientist Francis Collins on evolution science faith religion genome gene language of God - Beliefnet.com
There's a very easy way to stop Atheists thinking that, tell them how religions are scientific.what I meant was that athiests think religious are unscientific.
There's a very easy way to stop Atheists thinking that, tell them how religions are scientific.
Ray Comfort??? you just lost any credibility you had.I've tried, it doesn't work that good.
but there is a book by ray comfort about science and the Bible.
I've tried, it doesn't work that good.
but there is a book by ray comfort about science and the Bible.
Ray Comfort??!
Ray "Banana Man" Comfort???!!
Seriously?
Ray Comfort??? you just lost any credibility you had.
This is the last you will hear from me.
Yep....you're beyond help Grady.....
I've tried, it doesn't work that good.
but there is a book by ray comfort about science and the Bible.
Dude, you're in danger of going full crocoduck.
You never go full crocoduck.
The point is that the crocoduck, as well as the argument from bananas - and Comfort having admitted several times during interviews that he doesn't understand evolution - show quite clearly that Comfort has no useful opinions regarding any scientific matter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?