Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life
1. There is no such thing as an evolutionist. There are evolutionary biologists who study evolution, and the layman who accepts evolution for the reality that it is.
2. Evolution has NOTHING to do with the origin of life. It only explains the DIVERSITY of life.
3. YOu're looking for abiogenesis.
matter resulted from nothing
1. Evolution says nothing about the origin of the universe/matter
2. The Big Bang theory doesn't say that
3. No scientist ever said that.
and humans resulted from animals
Humans are animals, and there is enourmous amounts of evidence to support the theory that humans evolved.
each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world.
Only the second one is.
Life is far too complex to have resulted from any chance happening.
Evolution and abiogenesis are not chance, they have specific mechanisms, which are NOT random.
Even the simplest form of life consists of billions of parts working together and needed for the basic functioning of the organism.
NO, the simplest form of life is self-replicating molecules, and are made of very few parts.
These could not have sprung into being at the same time and interrelating together by chance.
The self-replicating molecules could. OH wait, it wasn't by chance.
Life coming from matter would violate the law of biogenesis and the cell principle which state that life must come only from life.
Those laws ONLY have to do with life once it's here.
Secondly, we find that the first matter could not simply have come into existence from nothing.
Evolution, BIg Bang, abiogenesis, and any scientist never said that.
This is a logical absurdity.
It is, which is why no one ever said that.
Finally, we find that morality in humanity as well as our mental capacity and utter dominance of the physical world make humanity set apart by any reasonable means from the rest of the living world.
THat's not proof against evolution.