[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]We all ask three questions: [/FONT]
[FONT="]'why does anything exist at all?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]'is God mad at himself that evil exists?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]'how do we know that we know?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]These are not questions that specialized academics have, but rather everyoneas a matter of ordinary curiosity; all people chisel their way through these. Actually, because there are such solid answers about these things in Christianity, intellectuals have generally left them behind for modern questions about womens or sexual or gender or racial issues, which are neither historic nor truly philosophical questions. [/FONT]
[FONT="]For most of the 20th century they were known as the being problem, the moral problem, and epistemology (access to knowledge).[/FONT]
[FONT="]In each case, the Biblical truth is that each one is answered in the historic reality of the Biblical message before we even know it is a question. The only reason it does not come up as such in the Biblical narrative is not ignorance nor to mock the importance of it. Rather it is already answered in the basis or presuppositions of the Biblical view of things. Modern man suffers greatly by thinking that the Biblical message is some form of 'religious' or mythological or irrational conception.[/FONT]
[FONT="]When one modern philosopher (Sartre) concluded that nothing (of us, of this universe) should be there it was because he excluded the basis found on each page of the Bible. There was nothing illogical about his ability to make conclusions, but he made a deliberate mistake by not testing a system of thought that started where the Bible does, with Gods being there (with details to follow). Had he done that, his logical skills would have accepted the Biblical details. It is not very professional to make that kind of error. [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]'why does anything exist at all?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]'is God mad at himself that evil exists?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]'how do we know that we know?'[/FONT]
[FONT="]These are not questions that specialized academics have, but rather everyoneas a matter of ordinary curiosity; all people chisel their way through these. Actually, because there are such solid answers about these things in Christianity, intellectuals have generally left them behind for modern questions about womens or sexual or gender or racial issues, which are neither historic nor truly philosophical questions. [/FONT]
[FONT="]For most of the 20th century they were known as the being problem, the moral problem, and epistemology (access to knowledge).[/FONT]
[FONT="]In each case, the Biblical truth is that each one is answered in the historic reality of the Biblical message before we even know it is a question. The only reason it does not come up as such in the Biblical narrative is not ignorance nor to mock the importance of it. Rather it is already answered in the basis or presuppositions of the Biblical view of things. Modern man suffers greatly by thinking that the Biblical message is some form of 'religious' or mythological or irrational conception.[/FONT]
[FONT="]When one modern philosopher (Sartre) concluded that nothing (of us, of this universe) should be there it was because he excluded the basis found on each page of the Bible. There was nothing illogical about his ability to make conclusions, but he made a deliberate mistake by not testing a system of thought that started where the Bible does, with Gods being there (with details to follow). Had he done that, his logical skills would have accepted the Biblical details. It is not very professional to make that kind of error. [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]