Eucharist In different denominations

[MarkRohfrietsch]

It's not Receptionism. Receptionism means that it is the body and blood of Christ only upon being received by the communicant. Note that, in the wording you asked about and quoted, it said "and that the benefits of that real presence are received by faith.

If then, by default, the Anglican Church teaches that the real presence is received, but the benefits are not, I will concede to your argument that it is not receptionism.

Thanks for the clarification and I apologies for my density.

 

[Paidiske]

No apologies necessary; this topic is enough to make most anybody's head hurt!

 

[MarkRohfrietsch]

No apologies necessary; this topic is enough to make most anybody's head hurt!

You are most kind. Yes, it can be cause cranial pain; but this truly is important stuff. I am blessed to have good people to discuss this with.

This is off topic to this thread, but as a theologian, you may enjoy the discussions here; it originates in Austrailia as well!: Just and Sinner Podcast

Also, a rather civil and at times humerus theological discussion; my Pastor Matt Fenn participated in this one: Augsburg Panel - March 2020

What a blessing it would be if all discussions on here could take this tone regardless of disagreements: Augsburg Panel - March 2020

 

[Paidiske]

Thanks!

Today being Easter day, I'm unlikely to look at them immediately, but in a couple of days when I've recovered a bit I'll enjoy having a browse.

 

[MarkRohfrietsch]

Easter now!! He is risen indeed!

 

[bbbbbbb]

Easter now!! He is risen indeed!

Yes, Christ is risen! Hallelujah!