JimfromOhio
Life of Trials :)
- Feb 7, 2004
- 27,738
- 3,738
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Marissa said:Had I been asked this 2 days ago I would have said OSNAS. Without a doubt in my mind. I've never armenist (sp?), but rather somewhere between calvinist and armenian. I consider both to be contradictory to the bible and rather was somewhere down the middle.
Yesterday however I read something by a staunch calvinist. Whenver this has come up before, I've never seen anything that made me consider OSAS to be true. He gave pretty good back up for it. Dozens upon dozens of verses. I'm in the middle of exam week atm for uni so I can't look into it right now, but when exams are done on Wednesday I plan on going through what he said.
Right now, I still accept OSNAS to the greater extent but until I look at it again I will say "I don't know".
I have been studying about salvation being taught by various denominations. I did some researching and found there are basically 3 kinds of salvation that are being taught in the Christian world.
Free Grace Theology
This doctrine states believers can fall into sins for a prolonged period of time and that it is possible for true believers to fall away without losing salvation. This is predominantly a dispensationalist doctrine. Those who hold to this view state that salvation is always in the aorist tense, so that once a person is converted he/she cannot be unconverted regardless of the circumstances. I have heard that theologians who hold to this view are Charles Stanley, Zane Hodges, Charles Ryrie, Erwin Lutzer, Robert Thieme, Michael Cocoris, John Hart, Chuck Swindoll, Earl Radmacher, and all free grace believers.
Calvinism (Perseverance of the Saints) or (Lordship Salvation)
This doctrine states that those who are elected unto salvation will persevere till the end. Holiness and faithfullness will be a general mark for the believer and that true believers will never backslide or fall away from the faith. Those who hold to this position acknowledge that temporary sins will come into a believer's life, but holiness and righteousness will be the consistent lifestyle for the believer. This view denies the view that Christians can lose their salvation. This view is predominant in many Covenant based denominations like presbyterian and reformed baptist. I have heard that this view is held by theologians like John MacArthur (baptist/non-denominational), R. C. Sproul (presbyterian), J. I. Packer (presbyterian), John Gerstner, J. M. Boice (presbyterian), Kenneth Gentry, and James Kennedy (presbyterian).
Arminianism
This doctrine declares that you can lose your salvation. It teaches that you obtain salvation through faith in Christ, but then you must maintain your salvation status or lose it. There's some variation in the Arminian community as to whether one loses salvation by sinning (in which case to maintain your salvation status, you would be required to maintain a certain outward performance or behavior or you lose it by simply not believing anymore, or a combination of these. Aminianism tends to be dominant in those churches that are derived from a Wesleyan tradition such churches as Methodist and Pentecostal (including Assembly of God).
I hope I got this right. Let me know if I didn't.
Upvote
0