Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes that is true God draws us, but we do have the choice, but God already knows what we will do and who is his, but all of us were born dead in the flesh and had to choose life. It is a fair chance for everyone.
I love that verseAll evil comes from God who created all things. Evil is part of God's will.
Isaiah 45:7 KJV
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.
The truth is we do not have control over the good or evil we do, all is part of God's will. If you are lucky you will be chosen for good things or if you are unlucky God will destroy you.
The fatalism implicit in Calvinism and predestination is depressing. This is not the message of Jesus as reflected in the Gospels. When Jesus, Paul or the other apostles mention the Elect, they mean all of mankind who have chosen of their free will to follow Jesus and live the Christian life. God is all powerful and, thus, has the power to grant free will to man. Every book of Scripture is teeming with exhortations by John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul and others to repent and follow Jesus. Jesus tells Peter "Feed my Lambs" He tells all of us to love our neighbor as ourself. He gives us Ten Commandments to guide us toward living a life that is pleasing to Him. God, through his infinite mercy has offered us salvation through his Son. It is our choice, not fate, whether we accept this gift!
Well stated my friend, well stated!You're saying God takes away His own sovereignty to give man a free will? Where can we find this in the Bible? (Please don't reference Joshua 24:15. Calvinists believe in having a will, just not a free will.) So we can put aside Romans 8:28-30, Ephesians 1:4-5, 1 Thessalonians 1:4-5 and say "God ain't sovereign anymore. He gave mankind free will. All that predestined stuff, eh, He's just looking into the future." Well, I'm not sure how God in His "sacrificed sovereignty to give man a free will" is able to foresee this "free" will. This Arminian argument never makes sense to me. How can God foresee a free will? And why is Calvinism depressing? Knowledge between free will or no free will doesn't have to affect your satisfaction in life. Also, yes, God does command all to repent. He also commands all not to lie. Just because He commands something doesn't mean we can do it. Remember our nature is corrupted by the love for sin. Repentance is a gift from God and people can only be repentant if he/she is drawn from God (being of the elect) (John 6:65).
The bottom line is we cannot choose God and we are naturally enemies of God. Our nature is too corrupt (Romans 8:7). Therefore, the only way we can be saved is if God draws us to Him. Not through works or anything, it's simply up to God's will. Nobody can come to Jesus unless he is drawn by the Father (John 6:44). Now what does Jesus say about those whom the Father draws? "All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out" (John 6:37). The Lord will "raise them up at the last day" (John 6:44). Those whom are called end up being glorified (Romans 8:28-30). Not drifiting away. Not losing their salvation. Not being abandoned by God. None of that. The called are never forsaken and are glorified in the end.
Therefore, perseverance of the saints is true.
If we are dead how can we choose? Does not God need to make us alive so that we can choose? And if we are alive to choose, awakened from our stupor that causes in us violence against his Holiness, what response can there possibly be but to repent in ashes. If we do not repent having seen the goodness of God and our own violence against his Holiness I submit to you that we have not yet seen the goodness of God and do not comprehend our violence against his Holiness.
You're saying God takes away His own sovereignty to give man a free will? Where can we find this in the Bible? (Please don't reference Joshua 24:15. Calvinists believe in having a will, just not a free will.) So we can put aside Romans 8:28-30, Ephesians 1:4-5, 1 Thessalonians 1:4-5 and say "God ain't sovereign anymore. He gave mankind free will. All that predestined stuff, eh, He's just looking into the future." Well, I'm not sure how God in His "sacrificed sovereignty to give man a free will" is able to foresee this "free" will. This Arminian argument never makes sense to me. How can God foresee a free will? And why is Calvinism depressing? Knowledge between free will or no free will doesn't have to affect your satisfaction in life. Also, yes, God does command all to repent. He also commands all not to lie. Just because He commands something doesn't mean we can do it. Remember our nature is corrupted by the love for sin. Repentance is a gift from God and people can only be repentant if he/she is drawn from God (being of the elect) (John 6:65).
The bottom line is we cannot choose God and we are naturally enemies of God. Our nature is too corrupt (Romans 8:7). Therefore, the only way we can be saved is if God draws us to Him. Not through works or anything, it's simply up to God's will. Nobody can come to Jesus unless he is drawn by the Father (John 6:44). Now what does Jesus say about those whom the Father draws? "All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out" (John 6:37). The Lord will "raise them up at the last day" (John 6:44). Those whom are called end up being glorified (Romans 8:28-30). Not drifiting away. Not losing their salvation. Not being abandoned by God. None of that. The called are never forsaken and are glorified in the end.
Therefore, perseverance of the saints is true.
So you are saying is Jesus's death is only a potential propitiation to reconcile the lost back to God, and not a particular propitiation. How can sins be paid for twice? If Jesus paid for the sins of all and some reject Him do they pay a second payment to God for what Jesus has already paid for? Therefore Jesus either only paid for some sins of all or did he paid for all sins of some? To say that people in are in hell for sins that have been paid for is making man more sovereign than God and trampling under foot the redemptive work of Christ. Either Jesus death was purposeful (if it rests in God's hands) or useless (if it rests in man's hands and they go to hell for sins already paid for).We are naturally enemies of God? Says who? We are tainted by original sin because of Adam's fall but saying we are therefore naturally enemies of God is a leap beyond Christian doctine. We are all sinners but most Christians among us strive to follow God, as feeble as our efforts can sometimes be.
God is good and created us. Why would he create a world consisting of enemies? He planted a seed of goodness in all of us. If we respond to and act on this grace we become closer to Him.
Why would Jesus command the crowds to repent, drop everything and follow him, if the Elect had already been predetermined? Calvinist misconstrue what Elect really means. Christians who have freely chosen to listen to God, repent of their sins and follow Christ are the Elect. Assuming they persevere until the hour of their death, they will be in heaven. It is all up to them to respond to God's gift.
God is not giving up his "sovereignty" by giving man free will. God is the absolute sovereign of everything and always will be. He created man to populate his world and wants us to follow his commands. The Old Testament Jews couldn't so he sent Jesus and offered man a new covenant. If man accepts his gift of grace, repents and follows the teachings of Jesus in the Gospel, he will join the other saved in heaven. Again, the burden is on man to exercise his free will, avoid sin and follow Christ.
I'm not going to address each Bible verse cited in your post because I would be writing all night. Needless to say, I think Calvinists are missing the forest for the trees. A reading of Jesus' words, Paul's teachings and the entirety of the New Testament, presupposes the idea that man has free will and the ability to accept or reject God's ultimately gracious gift of his Son for our salvation.
So you are saying is Jesus's death is only a potential propitiation to reconcile the lost back to God, and not a particular propitiation. How can sins be paid for twice? If Jesus paid for the sins of all and some reject Him do they pay a second payment to God for what Jesus has already paid for? Therefore Jesus either only paid for some sins of all or did he paid for all sins of some? To say that people in are in hell for sins that have been paid for is making man more sovereign than God and trampling under foot the redemptive work of Christ. Either Jesus death was purposeful (if it rests in God's hands) or useless (if it rests in man's hands and they go to hell for sins already paid for).
I do know this, my question is about the ability of a dead man to do anything?
not unless the spirit first leads him he can't, that's clear in scripturewell he can pick up the phone when God is ringing.
At least St. Paul said it (Rom 5)We are naturally enemies of God? Says who?
Maybe you should take this up with the Majesterium,We are tainted by original sin because of Adam's fall but saying we are therefore naturally enemies of God is a leap beyond Christian doctrine.
Well you've obviously met and accept the claims of people who claim to be Christians but are not. All Christians strive to follow God.We are all sinners but most Christians among us strive to follow God, as feeble as our efforts can sometimes be.
He subjected creation to futility in hope.God is good and created us. Why would he create a world consisting of enemies? He planted a seed of goodness in all of us. If we respond to and act on this grace we become closer to Him.
Why would Jesus command the crowds to repent, drop everything and follow him, if the Elect had already been predetermined?
In effect we have the same group of people as the Elect, we're just debating on what is the cause of them being Elect, the Calvinist will say that it is God's causing apart from any work of man, those with a synergistic gospel will say something along the spectrum from God working with/in the person down to the pelagian position that man acheives his own salvation apart from the work of God.Calvinist misconstrue what Elect really means. Christians who have freely chosen to listen to God, repent of their sins and follow Christ are the Elect. Assuming they persevere until the hour of their death, they will be in heaven. It is all up to them to respond to God's gift.
That's a very dispensational view of the covenants, I didn't think that romanists bought into that whole thing.God is not giving up his "sovereignty" by giving man free will. God is the absolute sovereign of everything and always will be. He created man to populate his world and wants us to follow his commands. The Old Testament Jews couldn't so he sent Jesus and offered man a new covenant. If man accepts his gift of grace, repents and follows the teachings of Jesus in the Gospel, he will join the other saved in heaven. Again, the burden is on man to exercise his free will, avoid sin and follow Christ.
I'm going to have to disagree with you here, an honest reading of the NT has God at the center of everything, his plan is to redeem in the person and work of Christ, presupposing that what God proposes will not be disposed of, and that this is the work that he planned from eternity past brings us to a discussion of predestination and election in eternity past.I'm not going to address each Bible verse cited in your post because I would be writing all night. Needless to say, I think Calvinists are missing the forest for the trees. A reading of Jesus' words, Paul's teachings and the entirety of the New Testament, presupposes the idea that man has free will and the ability to accept or reject God's ultimately gracious gift of his Son for our salvation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?