Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
While your opposites may match up logically, your opinion of the Pre-millenial wrath is in err. You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude. Revelation is a mystery and to lay it out like a road map or timeline is only satisfying your desire to know what will happen, but Revelation wasn't meant to be a timeline of certain events signifying the end of man. I think it is more of a promise to those who believe of what will come.Telrunya said:Satan is not the opposite of God. He is the opposite of Michael, and is a created being. He is not the adversary of God but rather the adversary of man. I believe when you reduce Satan and God as figurative and opposite representations you are stepping way across the lines of apostasy. If you take the bible to mean exactly what it says, then the pre-millennial pre wrath rapture is the only view that makes sense IMO
Rather, you must interprate Revelation the way you interprate Genesis through Jude. Revelation must not be interprated in a vacuum, as you suggest.SLStrohkirch said:You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude.
Rather, it is a Revelation, literally a Revealing.Revelation is a mystery
True, Jesus didn't know 'when' while on earth, but scripture records that sometime after the ascention, The Father told Him when, and He sent this information to John, charging Him to record it for us.Jesus told his disciples that not even he knew when the end would come because the Father in Heaven had not revealed it to him. So if Jesus doesn't know, how can you know?
So are you saying you believe in a "literal" millenium?vinsight4u said:All of the saints will sit, then John just notes that among them are the ones that were beheaded. He goes on to tell us that .......this is
the first resurrection
So all from Adam to even the two witnesses from the trib time must be in this group that sits on thrones.
the first resurrection crowd
It is here, after Satan has been bound, that all from the first resurrection crowd will take their seats.
Satan bound for 1000 years
while the saved people rule with Jesus for 1000 years
hath part in the first resurrection
they shall be the priests of God and
reign with Him a thousand years
When the thousand years are up
Satan is loosed out of his prison.
Satan sets out to deceive the nations again.
Why?
Those born during the time Jesus and the saved people reign must eventually be tested by the devil.
Ah yes, another reason not to take the book of Revelation too literally.vinsight4u said:I believe that Jesus will return at the 7th trumpet. The great tribulation against the church and Israel will be over then. It will be announced that the kingdoms of this world have become His. Thus to say........that the place of the kingdom throne for the earth is taken forever back and it will be done by Jesus Christ. He will free Israel and take the all changed at the last trumpet crowd home to heaven.
Rev. 19:6
Rev. 11:15
Ok, here is a Lutheran point of view on this scripture. I got it from Pastor Will Weedon in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.sweetsarge said:I have a question about Revelation 20. I will quote the specific verse from two different versions and then post my question.
Revelation 20:4-5
King James Version:
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them and judgment was given unto them; and I saw the souls of them that were behead for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their forheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
NIV Version:
I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
Question:
Does this imply that only those who were faithful with Christ during the tribulation and died for Him will return with Christ to reign for 1 thousand years and the rest of the saints (the ones who died before the tribulation began) will not return until the 1 thousand years are ended?
If anyone can help me with this, will appreciate it alot.
Sweet
In understanding this passage, one needs to look at how those who are at the second resurrection are judged, and then also look at eveything else in scriture about judgment. We, who are in Christ, are not under condemnation (Romans 8:1), and while we face the judgement seat of Christ (Romans 14:10), are not judged on our works to determine our salvation, but are rewarded or not rewarded for our acts. But we are still saved. Those in the second resurrection are judged by their works and face the fire of condemnation (the second death).sweetsarge said:I have a question about Revelation 20. I will quote the specific verse from two different versions and then post my question.
Revelation 20:4-5
King James Version:
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them and judgment was given unto them; and I saw the souls of them that were behead for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their forheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
NIV Version:
I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
Question:
Does this imply that only those who were faithful with Christ during the tribulation and died for Him will return with Christ to reign for 1 thousand years and the rest of the saints (the ones who died before the tribulation began) will not return until the 1 thousand years are ended?
If anyone can help me with this, will appreciate it alot.
Sweet
I beleive you are in error, here. Revelation is to be interpreted similar to other prophecy, and one needs to interpret it in light of scripture. Daniel, Ezekiel, Joel, Zechariah, Zephaniah, Hosea, and even Genesis (and more) shed light on Revelation, for there is yet unfulfilled prophecy in the OT.SLStrohkirch said:While your opposites may match up logically, your opinion of the Pre-millenial wrath is in err. You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude. Revelation is a mystery and to lay it out like a road map or timeline is only satisfying your desire to know what will happen, but Revelation wasn't meant to be a timeline of certain events signifying the end of man. I think it is more of a promise to those who believe of what will come.
Jesus told his disciples that not even he knew when the end would come because the Father in Heaven had not revealed it to him. So if Jesus doesn't know, how can you know?
Scott Strohkirch
Lutheran at Large
While I don't disagree that we should heed that which is written in it you mention the OT prophets which, with the exception of Daniel, either give prophecy concerning Christ's first coming or events that were to come in their time. The 1000 years is mentioned only as a completion of time not a literal 1000 years.FreeinChrist said:I beleive you are in error, here. Revelation is to be interpreted similar to other prophecy, and one needs to interpret it in light of scripture. Daniel, Ezekiel, Joel, Zechariah, Zephaniah, Hosea, and even Genesis (and more) shed light on Revelation, for there is yet unfulfilled prophecy in the OT.
Look at who it is from:
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated {it} by His angel to His bond-servant John,Rev 1:2 who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, {even} to all that he saw.
The end will come when God decrees it, but there is this:
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.
His obvious lack of knowledge of dispenationism is showing here, for those who have been martyred prior to the Tribulation period are raised/raptured and then return WITH Christ at the Second Coming , which brings in the millennial reign. Those that are beheaded by the AC ( the beast) are rasied AFTER the Second Coming.SLStrohkirch said:Ok, here is a Lutheran point of view on this scripture. I got it from Pastor Will Weedon in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.
They often accuse us of not taking the Scripture literally, specifically in regard to this passage. But what this passage literally says is that only those who are *beheaded* (like St. Paul, whose martyrdom the Church celebrated yesterday) come alive and reign with Christ for the "1000 years." Good news for the Christians who suffer martyrdom in Iraq, I suppose. But I have NEVER heard a dispensationalist say that this refers only to those who are martyred by beheading.
More error on his part about the Dispensationist view. Those that go Against Christ at the Second Coming are dead and do not ienter the millennial reign. It is only thosewho belonged to the nations that went against Christ who survive...but then they are subject to 'the sheep and goat judgment.'Franzmann: 4. The futility of Satan's still-impending last attack (the great tribulation of which Jesus had spoken, Matt 24:21) is already foretokened by the succinct description of the fate of the persecuted church in vv. 4-6. During those "thousand years" the existence of the church has before it the key signature of dying, and behold we live (2 Cor. 6:9; cf. Romans 8:37 *In all these things* we are more than conquerors through him who loved us). Those faithful ones who have been judged and condemned in human courts, beheaded for their testimony to Jesus (because they have confessed Him as the acquitting Word of God, 19:13, which silences the voice of the accuser and makes void the claim of Antichrist to their worship and fealty) they are in reality not judged and condemned men but the judges; they are enthroned as judges over all the hostile powers which have apparently triumphed over them. In the court of God the verdict of the world is reversed; there the Spirit pleads their cause and convinces the world concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged (John 16:8,11). John's language recalls the description in Daniel of the judgment executed through the Son of Man upon the four beasts arising from the sea who symbolized the powers hostile to God and His people (Dan. 7:9-14). Those who have lost their lives for Christ's sake find their life (Matt 10:39); they come to life and reign with Christ (cf. John 12:26).
And this agrees with dispensationism, and the view that the 'first resurrection' is a resurrection to life.5. Christ promise, I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live. (John 11:25) and He holds to His word. For those who believe in Him there is a first resurrection, a being-raised to a life not canceled out by mens dying, a life like that of the risen Christs, no longer exposed to death (cf. Roman 6:9). Those who have refused to find resurrection and life in Christ will not share in this first resurrection during the 1,000 years.
I don't think your friend understands premillennialism in the least.Millennial Hope:
The three verses of Rev. 20:4-6 are actually the only basis for what has come to be known as millennialism (a term derived from the Latin for thousand years) or chiliasm (from the Greek word for thousand), namely the expectation (in a variety of forms) Òthat before the resurrection of the dead, saints and godly men will possess and worldly kingdom and annihilate all the godless (AC XVII).
The earthly reign is referred to in the OT, the apostles expected that Christ would start an earthly reign in Acts 1, and the amount of time of the reign was not given UNTIL 95-96 AD, to John.The words of our Lord, in all other respects in strong agreement with the witness of the Revelation to John, say nothing of a triumphant interregnum of Christ and His own before His final return to judge the quick and the dead and to gather His elect into glory. With this the rest of the NT witnesses agree. The whole NT witness is not only silent as regards a millennium; rather, it excludes the idea of a millennium: according to it, the church will remain the church hidden under the cross to the very end, and he who endure to the end will be saved (Matt 10:22)
Those who deny the prophecy of the millennial reign need to ask themselves why they question God. Why don't they listen to the following:Those who cherish and foster the millennial hope (and these have from of old included great and good men) need to ask themselves whether the desire to have and enjoy a visible victory before the final victory of the Crucified is not a subtle and unconscious form of objection to the Crucified who unseals the scroll taken from the hand of God; He in His wisdom and power keeps the church hidden under the cross, and He has promised to be with His church, under the cross, to the close of the age. (Matt 28:20)
God gave many prophecies that gave a literal time - to Abraham about the enslavement of Israel, about the wandeing in the wilderness for 40 years, about the 70 year captivity in Babylon....why is this prophecy, given by God, not literal? Because Augustine, after 400 AD, decided it was?SLStrohkirch said:While I don't disagree that we should heed that which is written in it you mention the OT prophets which, with the exception of Daniel, either give prophecy concerning Christ's first coming or events that were to come in their time. The 1000 years is mentioned only as a completion of time not a literal 1000 years.
Revelation is not altogether a literal prophesy to lay out as a road to show that such and such will happen at this time or that time. I never said I didn't believe that Satan was not a created being, but he has been in effect. We are all sinners and tempted to sin each and every day. Just because we are saved by our confession of Christ does not mean that we are not still sinners.FreeinChrist said:God gave many prophecies that gave a literal time - to Abraham about the enslavement of Israel, about the wandeing in the wilderness for 40 years, about the 70 year captivity in Babylon....why is this prophecy, given by God, not literal? Because Augustine, after 400 AD, decided it was?
Satan is bound and shut in the abyss during the 1000 years....so he has been not in effect on the earth all these years?
Why did Peter refer to Satan as the "prince of the power of the air? And refer to being hindered by Satan if Satan is in the abyss? Satan is a created being, a fallen angel, and is not omnipresent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?