Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are making the same mistake the Pharisees made. They invented the Millennium and Jesus proved them wrong throughout the gospels.This is a flat out denial of about a fourth of the Old Testament.
Yep.You are making the same mistake the Pharisees made. They invented the Millennium and Jesus proved them wrong throughout the gospels.
“Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures,” Luke 24:45 (NASB95)This is a flat out denial of about a fourth of the Old Testament.
the Pharisees believed in a coming messianic world king, were they (completely) wrong about that too? The notion of a millennium age of the Church is obviously part of revelation“Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures,” Luke 24:45 (NASB95)
Did this result in embracing the Pharisee's doctrine of the Millennium? Most would think so. But then the Pharisees would have taught Jesus a few things.
The Millennium is temporal. Jesus' kingdom is without end and began with his first advent.the Pharisees believed in a coming messianic world king, were they (completely) wrong about that too? The notion of a millennium age of the Church is obviously part of revelation
The notion of a millennium age of the Church is obviously part of revelation
It was only in the Revelation that we were told that this coming kingdom would last 1000 years. But many chapters of the Old Testament are devoted to descriptions of a coming kingdom on this earth. Those who deny that this kingdom is indeed coming on this earth are denying a very large amount of explicitly stated scripture.the Pharisees believed in a coming messianic world king, were they (completely) wrong about that too? The notion of a millennium age of the Church is obviously part of revelation
Rather than argue with you, I will simply quote explicitly stated scripture.How many mortals are left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46?
How will mortals survive the "flaming fire" at the return of Christ in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10?
When does the fire come in Revelation chapter 20?
Did Peter say the fire comes on "the day of the Lord" when He "comes as a thief" in 2 Peter 3:10-13?
.
I don't understand what you're getting atHow many mortals are left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46?
How will mortals survive the "flaming fire" at the return of Christ in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10?
When does the fire come in Revelation chapter 20?
Did Peter say the fire comes on "the day of the Lord" when He "comes as a thief" in 2 Peter 3:10-13?
.
Kingdom & Millennium are two different words in Greek, for two different conceptsIt was only in the Revelation that we were told that this coming kingdom would last 1000 years. But many chapters of the Old Testament are devoted to descriptions of a coming kingdom on this earth. Those who deny that this kingdom is indeed coming on this earth are denying a very large amount of explicitly stated scripture.
You cannot Scripturally deny that there are two (2) resurrections, separated by (more than) a thousand yearsHow many mortals are left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46?
How will mortals survive the "flaming fire" at the return of Christ in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10?
When does the fire come in Revelation chapter 20?
Did Peter say the fire comes on "the day of the Lord" when He "comes as a thief" in 2 Peter 3:10-13?
.
yes, exactly, the one is but one phase / age / era / epoch / timespan of the otherThe Millennium is temporal. Jesus' kingdom is without end and began with his first advent.
“And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.” Luke 1:31–33 (KJV 1900)
“But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.” Luke 11:20 (KJV 1900)
But Jesus refutes millennialism throughout the gospels.yes, exactly, the one is but one phase / age / era / epoch / timespan of the other
Dave - do you mean He refuted a literal physical kingdom on earth? Is that what you mean by "millennialism"? ISTM there has to be some explanation of the phrase/term used in Rev 20:4 - 6.But Jesus refutes millennialism throughout the gospels.
Yes, Jesus taught the kingdom is spiritual and only the born again can see it.Dave - do you mean He refuted a literal physical kingdom on earth? Is that what you mean by "millennialism"? ISTM there has to be some explanation of the phrase/term used in Rev 20:4 - 6.
Jesus does not contradict Revelation 20, correct ?But Jesus refutes millennialism throughout the gospels.
The 1000 years represent Satan's binding, not the kingdom. He attacks the kingdom when loosed.Jesus does not contradict Revelation 20, correct ?
In His own 1st century AD, the "Kingdom" was spiritual and only the born again were aware of it
Centuries later, in the "Millennium", the whole world knew of the "Kingdom" because the Church had "surfaced" and gained societal primacy, having overcome the pagan Roman empire
again, "Millennium" and "Kingdom" are two different words, Chiloi etos (G5507 G2904) vs. Basilea (G932)
Kingdom is a social group on earth, 1000 years is a time span
I believe the question was focused on the teachings of Jesus and how they line up with Rev 20. There has to be consistency between the two. ***I may be wrong, but that is how I read Erik's post.The 1000 years represent Satan's binding, not the kingdom. He attacks the kingdom when loosed.
They are consistent.I believe the question was focused on the teachings of Jesus and how they line up with Rev 20. There has to be consistency between the two.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?