• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

JesusRev

Newbie
Nov 16, 2008
55
1
✟16,860.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Book of Enoch.
Worth studying seriously?


Secrets of the Book of Enoch.

1. Son of Man named and revealed, even before time, sun, moon, star.

2. And it said sinners would be dragged off to Hell.. before time, sun, moon, stars where even created.

3. Orbital paths, equinoxes, six portals revealed. Constellations and workings of Heaven, understanding of seasons, phases of the moon, years, days, hours described.

4. Talks of Heaven, Hell, Paradise, Tree of Life. And Angels and Angelical hosts.

5. Enoch perfectly describes a black hole. And that black holes are the holding cell for fallen stars.

6. Enoch describes fallen angels mating with humans, creating Nephilium. Literal Giants, half-breeds.
He also describes dinosaurs.


Get you to thinking about what all is out there, waiting for Christians to discover. The most powerful Word from God are those that arent preached.
But, you also have to ponder why the occult and the freemasons use this book in their rituals. And the knowledge it provides.

Any thoughts?
 

Christian Commando

Christian Commando
May 20, 2008
6
0
68
USA
✟22,616.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
JesusRev-

I've read most of that "book" already and found several discrepancies that directly contradict God's Word. One of those is- It refers to there being "7 Heavens", where God's Word only refers to there being 3.

I'll have to go back thru my research, but can provide Scripture foundations in God's Word and the other examples I particularly noted and why I rejected "Enoch's "Book' as "God Breathed"-(spoken), as His only true Word was by Him.

Besides the fact there are also major Christian Research Sources out there who have publicly published this same info I picked out, as well as more yet, to claim this is why the Earlier church Leaders who came across this "Book" never accepted it into the "Canon of Scripture."

Also- According to those other sources, they are of the belief that other people in later centuries were actually the author of those writings and not such as "Enoch's Book" , the person its named after.

I'm really quite supprised that people hadn't seen what I mention and the other points I can share if they've actually read the "Book of Enoch" and knows God's True Word well enough to pick out those discrepancies- falsehoods.

How I see this subject-

God Bless!!
 
Upvote 0

shammahbn

Newbie
Aug 17, 2009
3
0
✟22,613.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's not really true to say that "the Earlier church Leaders who came across this "Book" never accepted it into the Canon of Scripture."

The 2nd and 3rd century church didn't have an official canon, but if they had, Enoch would definitely have been in some of them. The Book of Enoch influences almost every Ante-Nicene writing, and it is directly quoted in Jude. Also, Jesus' description of Hades in Luke is very similar to that which is in Enoch.

The idea that books are the completely inspired Word of God or they're just not inspired is really rather new. It was a long time before the Church picked up such an idea. Even as late as A.D. 390, Augustine was talking about books that some churches accepted and others didn't.

Early church leaders clearly had some idea of degrees of inspiration, even as the Jews still do today. Paul's letter to the Corinthians carried more authority than, say, Jude, because Corinthians was accepted by all the churches, but Jude was in question by some.

Enoch on the other hand is used pretty universally in the early church, though no one says, "The Book of Enoch is part of the Bible."

However, that's because there was no official canon, so lists weren't often made. The Muratorian Fragment is the only one that dates before the 4th century.

So, really, it's your idea of the canon that wasn't accepted by the early Church leaders. Enoch was accepted by them and often used.

You might want to do a study some time and see how the writers of Scripture used the term "The Word of God." It was only occasionally a reference to Scripture, and it certainly wasn't simply an interchangeable term for the Scriptures as a whole.
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I've read most of that "book" already and found several discrepancies that directly contradict God's Word. One of those is- It refers to there being "7 Heavens", where God's Word only refers to there being 3.
Where does God ever say there are 3 heavens?

Jesus has this to say:

"In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you." -- Jesus Christ, extraterrestrial, John 14:2
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
lol, of course if you accept the Deuterocanon as God's word, like the early church did in the Councils of Hippo in 393 A.D. and the Council of Carthage in 397 A.D., then it is rather hard to dismiss it as contradicting God's Word..... because the Deuterocanon IS God's word. Anyways.
 
Upvote 0

sudzer

Newbie
Jan 18, 2006
7
0
73
Combermere, Ont Canada
✟22,617.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I have read and reread the Book Of Enoch, there is much there to understand and it gives more understanding to the scriptures. The early Jews of Jesus obviously read this book and studied it, so did the the profits, why else would they have quoted it. Do an study of Daniel then read Enoch you will see a very close conection. Ask God to give you revelation when you read, it is He who opens your mind to the scriptures. May God richly Bless His word to our Hearts.
 
Upvote 0

Dionysiou

Junior Member
Feb 2, 2010
927
32
Narnia
✟17,988.00
Country
Bahamas
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Again you are supposed to look to the Holy Spirit for guidance on a book, not your own understanding. The book of Enoch is good, nothing in it is troubling and it was paul who spoke of the third heaven, what they call the different levels of heaven is irrelavant anyway. cmon people.
 
Upvote 0

Clearly

Newbie
Mar 31, 2010
636
7
✟16,223.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
In response to ChristianCommando's claim that "Earlier church Leaders who came across this "Book" never accepted it into the "Canon of Scripture." Shammahbn replied :
shammahbn said:
“It's not really true to say that "the Earlier church Leaders who came across this "Book" never accepted it into the Canon of Scripture."

Shammahbn :

I very much agree with you that early Judao-Christian Enoch WAS viewed as scripture in many religious circles. It REMAINS scripture nowadays by some christians. For example: The Ethiopic orthodox has 45 million Christian members and they continue to revere Enoch in their canon of scripture..

It is obvious that early Christian writers read the book of Enoch. The great apocryphologist R.H. charles reminds us that "nearly all the writers of the New Testament were familiar with it, and were more or less influenced by it in thought and diction," and he reminds us further that "it is quoted as a genuine production of Enoch by St. Jude, and as Scripture by St. Barnabas. . . . With the earlier Fathers and Apologists it had all the weight of a canonical book."

In his initial study of Jewish Enoch, Charles quotes no less than 128 places in the New Testament where it is either quoted or influences a quote. The Enochian influence is so great that Charles declares that "The influence of I Enoch on the New Testament has been greater than that of all the other apocryphal and pseudepigraphical books taken together." He further lists some thirty passages in early orthodox Jewish and Christian writings in which the book of Enoch is mentioned specifically, plus numerous citations from the book that are found in the important Jewish apocalyptic writings of Jubilees, the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, the Assumption of Moses, 2 Baruch, and 4 Ezra, and quotations from Enoch found in more than thirty Christian Patristic writers.

To these we might add the tremendous and obvious wealth of Enoch lore contained in the Zohar. Even the Pistis Sophia, (an important literary link between sectaries in Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and Palestinian Christianity and Judaism, claims to contain important material taken from "the two Books of Jeu which Enoch has written” Another quote from Pistis : “They should find the mysteries which are in the Book of Jeu which I caused Enoch to write in Paradise . . . [which I spake out of the tree of knowledge and the tree of life], and I caused him to place them in the rock of Ararad." MANY of the testament of the Twelve Patriarchs contain the phrase " I read from the Book of Enoch...", (and then the Patriarch would relate what was read - usually it related to immoralities or disobedience the sons of the Patriarch would do that would cause their descendants misery...)

The Christians got their enthusiasm for the book of Enoch as well as the book itself from the Jews. It was the Book of Enoch, Charles hailed as : "the most important pseudepigraph of the first two centuries B.C.". He had ample reason to make this claim: For examples : The Hasidic writings of the time as well as the later Cabalistic works show dependence on Enoch. Large parts of the lost Book of Enoch were included in the Pirke of Rabbi Eliezser and in the Hechalot (both highly respected works for scholars). Some of the oldest and most important fragments of Enoch have turned up among the Dead Sea Scrolls, and, in fact, there were more copies of Enoch discovered in this ancient library than almost any other book outside of the pentateuch and psalms!

I do not believe that a scholar of Early Christianity CAN understand the early Christian doctrines and the evolution of Christian doctrines without a study of Enoch as part of the library of texts which were popularly used among early Judao-Christian literature and “proto-christianity”. Nor do I believe that one can make full correlation of early Christian literature without referring to the various Enochs.

I think there were many reasons that western Christianity abandoned Enoch as the early Christian doctrines evolved and changed into some of the more modern forms of Christian doctrines. For example, western developing Christianities came under greater roman influence than the various eastern Christianities.

For examples :

Western Christianities under increasing roman and other influences, became less comfortable with Judao-Christian literature that referenced the Christian “Godhead” as three separate individuals.

Western Christian doctrines evolved in ways that increasingly allegorized and spiritualized angels. Western Christianity became, I think, increasingly uncomfortable with the early doctrines of angels as material beings having similarities to men on earth, possessing (and abusing) their free will.

Western Christian doctrines evolved away from and became increasingly uncomfortable with the early material descriptions of heaven, it’s inhabitants, and their activities.

I think that for these and other reasons, Enoch became less popular among the various western Christianities.

Clearly
drsisekk
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clearly

Newbie
Mar 31, 2010
636
7
✟16,223.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
POST ONE OF TWO

Lauralynn in post #13 said:
“I think Enoch is interesting.”

1) I agree with you that Enoch is interesting.

The Enochian literature is beyond "interesting". It is an immensely profound group of writings to the student of Early Judao-Christianity that I do not think a student of the Proto-Christian period will understand early Christian doctrines in their earliest form nor the historical evolution of Christian doctrines without the Enochian literature.

In the Enochian literature we find so many doctrines so typical to the earliest forms of Christianity. Often in clearer form than the later literature.

For examples :

the early versions of material Creation so typical of the early Jewish and Christian beliefs are found in clearer form in Enoch (as opposed to the ex-nihilo creation “out of nothing” many "modern" christianities adopted later). Such early Christian doctrines were not subject to the same criticisms from later scientific data regarding laws of conservation as are later (i.e. modern) Christian theories.

Many Creation council descriptions, so typical of early Christian literature exist in Enoch in clearer forms than the later Christian Literature. This is not true of EVERY theme, but it is true of many. For example : Themes concerning the controversies in heaven which resulted in Lucifers “fall” and expulsion from heaven with those loyal to him are more extensively treated in other early sacred texts, (i.e. in more extensive and clearer form than Enoch), yet Enoch adds to the earliest doctrines regarding Lucifers Fall and as to why the fall of man was both necessary and expected (e.g. Sedrach’s complaint) long before man was created in ways others texts do not treat these themes. These are themes which are so very controversial to later Christianities, were much simpler in early Christian theologies.

In Enoch are found clear descriptions of the pre-creation relationship between God and Jesus, and the choosing of the Son of God; the role of the son of God in pre-creation administration and the Father’s delegation of specific authority to the Son, and similar themes, are treated in enoch AND such themes are often clearer in Enoch than in other pseudoepigrapha (whether OT, OR NT, or DSS, or “apocryphal” eras literature). Regarding the pre-creation Choosing of the pre-mortal Jesus as the savior, enoch says
“ At that hour, that Son of Man was given a name, in the presence of the Lord of the Spirits, the Before-Time (Lit “before the beginning [or “head”] of days,”), 3 even before the creation of the sun and the moon, before the creation of the stars, he was given a name in the presence of the Lord of the Spirits. 4 He will become a staff for the righteous ones in order that they may lean on him and not fall. He is the light of the gentiles and he will become the hope of those who are sick in their hearts. 5 All those who dwell upon the earth shall fall and worship before him: they shall glorify, bless, and sing the name of the Lord of the Spirits. 6 For this purpose he became the Chosen One; he was concealed in the presence of (the Lord of the Spirits) prior to the creation of the world, and for eternity...” 1st Enoch 48:1-7
In Enoch are found clear representations of the Promise of a Savior made to Adam such as is found in much of the early christian literature (Adam and Eve - Vitae, etc) For example, upon Adam’s fall, the Lord promises Adam the resurrection :
“You are earth, and into the earth once again you will go, out of which I took you. And I will not destroy you, but I will send you away to what I took you from. Then I can take you once again at my second coming.” 2nd Enoch 31:2-8, 32:1
Such quotes, once they are corroborated by multiple early Judao-Christian texts take on the mantle of early orthodoxy. Such quotes from Judao-Christian Enoch mirror similar quotes from purely Christian Texts such as Testament of Adam. For example :

“Adam said to Seth, his son, “You have heard my son, that God is going to come into the world after a long time, (he will be) conceived of a virgin and put on a body, be born like a human being, and grow up as a child. He will perform signs and wonders on the earth, will walk on the waves of the seaa. ...2 He spoke to me about this in Paradise after I picked some of the fruit in which death was hiding: ‘Adam, Adam do not fear ... I am consigning you to death, and the maggot and the worm will eat your body.’3...But after a short time there will be mercy on you because you were created in my image, and I will not leave you to waste away in Sheol. ... For your sake I will taste death and enter the house of the dead....4'And after three days, while I am in the tomb, I will raise up the body I received from you. And I will set you at the right hand of my divinity, ... and I will restore to you and to your posterity that which is the justice of heaven.” Testament of Adam 3:1-4
Even the descriptions of Sheol (the place between death and resurrection) and the conditions there while spirits await resurrection is often clearer in enochian literature than in other Judao-Christian texts. For example : In enoch’s ascencion and descension vision, the angel explains this place (which Enoch sees) to enoch :
“Rufael, one of the holy angels, who was with me, responded to me; and he said to me,”These beautiful corners (are here) in order that the spirits of the souls of the dead should assemble into them–they are created so that the souls of the children of the people should gather here. 4 They prepared these places in order to put them (i.e. the souls of the people) there until the day of their judgment and the appointed time of the great judgment upon them. 5 I saw the spirits of the children of the people who were dead, and their voices were reaching unto heaven until this very moment.... 1st Enoch 22:1-5
It is the Enochian literature that goes into greater detail regarding this spirit world between death and resurrection :
“8 At that moment I raised a question regarding him and regarding the judgment of all, For what reason is one separated from the other? 9 And he replied and said unto me, “These three have been made in order that the spirits of the dead might be separated. And in the manner in which the souls of the righteous are separated (by) this spring of water with light upon it, 10 in like manner the sinners are set apart when they die and are buried in the earth and judgment has not been executed upon them in their lifetime, 11 upon this great pain, until the great day of judgment. – and to those who curse (there will be) plague and pain forever, and the retribution of their spirits. They will bind them there forever–even from the beginning of the world. 12 And in this manner is a separation made for the souls of those who make the suit (and) those who disclose concerning destruction, as they were killed in the days of the sinners. 13 Such has been made for the souls of the people who are not righteous, but sinners and perfect criminals; they shall be together with (other) criminals who are like them, (whose) souls will not be killed on the day of judgment but will not rise from there.” 1st Enoch 22:9-13

POST TWO OF TWO FOLLOWS
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clearly

Newbie
Mar 31, 2010
636
7
✟16,223.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
POST TWO OF TWO
One can continue with Enoch in greater depth and clarity, or build upon the ancient Christian doctrine by using correlating Christian themes from Enoch with other ancient Christian literature dealing with the same subject.

For example ; If one continues to discuss Sheol where souls go during the time period between death and resurrection : (Remember, in this ancient Christian theology, all souls, including the Patriarchs, upon dying, have their spirits placed into this spirit world.)
“do you not know that all those who (spring) from Adam and Eve die? And not one of the prophets escaped death and not one of those who reign has been immortal. Not one of the forefathers has escaped the mystery of death. All have died, all have departed into Hades, all have been gathered by the sickle of Death.” (TESTAMENT OF ABRAHAM (recension A) 8:9; 7)
“ And Death said, “Hear, righteous Abraham, for seven ages I ravage the world and I lead everyone down into Hades – kings and rulers, rich and poor, slaves and free I send into the depth of Hades (T of Abr (rec A) 19:7) .
Historically, (as Enoch clarifies), none of these references refer to the modern "Hell" that individuals may be sent to after the Judgment, but Hades was also a name for this "spirit world"; the "place in the middle". Another point of confusion (which Enoch easily clarifies) regarding Hades is that the experience there is NOT the same for all individuals since individuals are divided according to their degree of righteousness. Thus the ancient texts describe the experience and place differently according to who is sent there (i.e the righteous vs the unrighteous).

In describing Sheol, Enoch is shown that it has separate “areas” for individuals to be “assigned to”. In his vision, Enoch asks the angel :
”For what reason is one separated from the other? And he replied and said unto me, “These three have been made in order that the spirits of the dead might be separated. And in the manner in which the souls of the righteous are separated (by) this spring of water with light upon it, in like manner the sinners are set apart when they die and are buried in the earth and judgment has not been executed upon them in their lifetime,... until the great day of judgment...They will bind them there forever–even from the beginning of the world. ....Such has been made for the souls of the people who are not righteous, but sinners and perfect criminals; they shall be together with (other) criminals who are like them. (1Enoch 22:9-13)
Since the righteous are with the righteous, the righteous seem to adapt to a calm existence. However, the unrighteous, being grouped with others of their type and having increased awareness of the result of their moral choices become unhappy in their regrets and distress. And, Sheol itself also had a “middle place” according to this ancient Christian description.

In Abraham’s description of Hades, he asks the angel : “Is one who is unable to enter through the strait gate unable to enter into life?...4 And Michael answered...you will enter through it unhindered, as will all those who are like you.”...8And when they went, they found an angel holding in his hand one soul of a woman from among the six myriads, because he found (her) sins evenly balanced with all her works, and they were neither in distress nor at rest, but in an intermediate place.. ( TESTAMENT OF ABRAHAM (recension B) 9:1-10)

In this early doctrine, Hades was not simply a place where souls “sleep”, but they are cognizant and communicate and still have free will. Those spirits who had no idea nor concept of God’s plan for them are still allowed to learn and make moral choices just as those who had the gospel given to them while in mortality. They may make the same moral progress as any other individuals. For example : It is Enoch who describes his vision of Hades/Sheol, teaching that there are those there who teach moral law to those in Sheol :
“Come and I will show you where the souls of the wicked stand, and where the souls of the intermediate stand;... He said to me: The souls of the wicked are brought down to sheol....Samki’el is in charge of the souls of the intermediate, to support them and purify them from sin, through the abundant mercies of the Omnipresent One. “ (3en 44:1-3)
It is not merely Samki’el who teaches, but the spirit of men communicate and teach one another as the Christian texts describing Christ’s descension into Sheol (hades, hell, paradise, etc, etc) taught.

The Enoch references regarding the descent of Christ into “the place in between” (sheol, hades, hell, etc.) after his death is mirrored multiple ancient Christian accounts. For example : The Gospel of Bartholomew (which was in the early New Testament). In this account, the Apostle Bartholomew asks he risen Jesus :
“Lord, when you went to be hanged on the cross, I followed you at a distance and saw how you were hanged on the cross and how the angels descended from heaven and worshiped you. And when darkness came, I looked and saw that you had vanished from the cross; only I heard your voice in the underworld,.....Tell me, Lord, where you went from the cross.”
In this christian account, Jesus summarizes his descent into Hades saying :
"I went to the underworld to bring up Adam and all the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.... When I descended with my angels to the underworld ,in order to dash in pieces the iron bars and shatter the portals of the underworld”... “ I shattered the iron bars....And I brought out all the patriarchs and came again to the cross.... “I was hanged upon the cross for your sake and for the sake of your children.” (The Gospel of Bartholomew chapt one)
The early Christian Gospel of Nicodemus, text contains multiple parallel testimonies of the living Jesus after his resurrection AND descriptions of Jesus actions in Hades when he visited the “spirits imprisoned” there. Joseph (of Arimathea) observes to those discussing Jesus resurrection
“Why then do you marvel at the resurrection of Jesus? It is not this that is marvelous, but rather that he was not raised alone, but raised up many other dead men who appeared to many in Jerusalem. And if you do not know the others, yet Symeon, who took Jesus in his arms, [Luke 2:34] and his two sons, whom he raised up, you do know. For we buried them a little while ago. And now their sepulchers are to be seen opened and empty, but they themselves are alive and dwelling in Arimathaea”...Joseph said: “Let us go to Arimathaea and find them.” Then arose the chief priests Annas and Caiaphas, and Joseph and Nicodemus and Gamaliel and others with them, and went to Arimathaea and found the men of whom Joseph spoke.” (Gospel of Nicodemus Ch one)
These men then speak with the resurrected sons of Symeon (who were NOT Christians while they were alive). These two had died, and gone to the world of Spirits (i.e. sheol), converted to Christianity while in the spirit world, and had then been resurrected with many others at the resurrection of Christ and who were walking among and teaching others regarding Jesus. The brothers described what happened in this Spirit world (sheol, hades, etc).
“We, then were in Hades with all who have died since the beginning of the world. And at the hour of midnight there rose upon the darkness there something like the light of the sun and shone, and light fell upon us all, and we saw one another, and immediately our father, Abraham, along with the patriarchs and the prophets, was filled the joy, and they said to one another: “This shining comes from a great light.” The prophet Isaiah, who was present there, said : “This shining comes from the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. This I prophesied when I was still living: The land of Zabulon and the land of Nephthalim, the people that sit in darkness saw a great light.” Then there came into the midst another, an anchorite from the wilderness. The patriarchs asked him: “Who are you?” He replied: “I am John, the last of the prophets, who made straight the ways of the Son of God, and preached repentance to the people for the forgiveness of sins.....And for this reason he sent me to you, to preach that the only begotten Son of God comes here, in order that whoever believes in him should be saved,....Therefore I say to you all: When you see him, all of you worship him. For now only have you opportunity for repentance because you worshiped idols in the vain world above and sinned. At another time it is impossible” (Gospel of Nicodemus Ch two)
I might make the point here that it is not only John the Baptist’s spirit who is teaching the gospel in these early versions, but the spirits of the other Patriarchs among the spirits of men are teaching the gospel and many other spirits are also “called to testify” and teach gospel truths to the others in the spirit world. The story continues : “Now when John was thus teaching those who were in Hades, the first-created, the first father Adam heard, and said to his son Seth: My son, I wish you to tell the forefathers of the race of men and the prophets where I sent you when I fell into mortal sickness.”

Seth then teaches the others regarding the "oil of mercy" that Adam requested and that Seth was told
“go and tell your father than after the completion of fifty-five hundred years from the creation of the world, the only-begotten son of God shall become man and shall descend below the earth. And he shall anoint him with that oil. And he shall arise and wash him and his descendants with water and the Holy spirit. And then he shall be healed of every disease....When the patriarchs and prophets heard this, they rejoiced greatly.”
This same message was NOT merely for Patriarchs and Prophets, but for all souls there who would listen.

In chapter four, Satan adjure Hades to prevent Jesus from coming if it is possible,
“For I believe that he comes here to raise all the dead”....” and while Satan and Hades were speaking thus to one another, a loud voice like thunder sounded: “Lift up your gates, O rulers, and be lifted up, O everlasting doors, and the King of glory shall come in”...David said: “Do you not know, blind one, that when I lived in the world, I prophesied that word: ‘Lift up your gates, O rulers?’” (Ps 23:7). Isaiah said: “I foresaw this by the Holy Spirit and wrote: ‘The dead shall arise, and those who are in the tombs shall be raised up, and those who are under the earth shall rejoice (ps 26:19) O death, where is your sting? O Hades, where is your victory.’” .....the gates of brass were broken in pieces and the bars of iron were crushed and all the dead who were bound were loosed from their chains, and we with them. And the King of glory entered in like a man, and all the dark places of Hades were illumined.”
The sons of Symeon continue to relate that :
Ch VIII ...the King of glory stretched out his right hand, and took hold of our forefather Adam and raised him up. Then he turned also to the rest and said: “Come with me, all you who have suffered death through the tree which this man touched. For behold, I raise you all up again through the tree of the cross. With that he put them all out. “
Thus the promise made to Adam and recorded in Enochian Literature is fulfilled. AND, importantly, it is consistent with and supported by many literary Christian witnesses from the earliest centuries. Reading the later texts, without reference to the earlier texts leaves us with minimal context as to what the ancients (including the ancient Christians) believed. Enoch, is one of those singular Judao-Christian Texts that helps us in trying to determine what the earliest Christian doctrines were and how these doctrines evolved and changed over the centuries.

I hope this makes some sense as to why it is important to determine what the earliest Christian doctrines were and how the earliest texts can illuminate our understanding as to what such doctrines were. I do not, for myself, believe that the modern Christian doctrines have ANY advantage over the earliest Christian doctrines.



Lauralynn in post #13 said:
“It's not part of the Bible.”

2) This statement is incorrect as it stands. There is no light, no illumination in this statement. It offers no increase in understanding to a Christian trying to educate themselves about any other christianity than Lauralynn’s christianity.

Enoch may not be in "Lauralynn’s bible", but it IS in other christian bibles. For example, if you are an eastern Christian from say, the Ethiopian Orthodox Christian Church, then it IS considered scripture and IS retained in your bible today.

The statement is historically naive and it is provincial as well. This statement also offers no historical light; no historical understanding regarding the early Christians who read and used Enochian literature.
REMEMBER : This is a HISTORICAL thread dealing with HISTORICAL themes. Enochian literature WAS scripture to the early Jews and Christians who read it as such; who used it for belief and for doctrinal understanding and for inspiration. Much of the most profound Christian history and earliest doctrines involve the time BEFORE any roman church edicts created a somewhat arbitrary canon for the Roman Church (which, I assume, represents the “bible” you are referring to).

Remember, Enoch is part of a vast sacred Christian library that existed; was read and believed and quoted by early Christians (and Jews) BEFORE any arbitrary christian canon existed.; certainly before your personal and modern canon existed.



Clearly
vifusehk
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Remember, Enoch is part of a vast sacred Christian library that existed; was read and believed and quoted by early Christians (and Jews) BEFORE any arbitrary christian canon existed.; certainly before your personal and modern canon existed.



Clearly
vifusehk

Fact: The book of Enoch is not included in any Protestant version of the bible.

Fact: Baptists since 1742 in America have said that the book in question, is "no authority to the church of God, nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of than other human writings."

Fact: only two archangels are recorded in the Bible Michael, and Gabriel. Now I admit that the Catholic Bible includes Raphiel, but in the 66 books we use, it is not mentioned.

Fact: The Apocrypha was included in the 1611 KJV, but the apocryphal books are only valuable as ancient documents illustrative of the manners, language, opinions and history of the East.

Fact: Not one of the apocryphal books is written in the Hebrew language, which was alone used by the inspired historians and poets of the Old Testament. All Apocryphal books are in Greek, except one which is extant only in Latin.

Fact: The apocryphal books were never acknowledged as sacred scriptures by the Jews, custodians of the Hebrew scriptures (the apocrypha was written prior to the New Testament). In fact, the Jewish people rejected and destroyed the apocrypha after the overthow of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

Fact: The very definition of pseudopigrapha means "falsely attributed". Enoch is included in the pseudopigrapha.

Fact: If Enoch was so widely accepted, as you and your friend say, when the Septuagint was written, (circa 300 BCE-AD 100) it was notoriously left out. Not even Jerome's Latin Vulgate written about AD 382 includes it.

"From the blood of Abel [cf. Gen. 4:8] to the blood of Zechariah [cf. 2 Chron. 24:20], who was killed between the altar and the house of God; yes, I tell you, it shall be charged against this generation (Lk. 11:51; cf. Mt. 23:35)."

Abel was the first martyr in the Old Testament from the book of Genesis, while Zecharias was the last martyr in the book of Chronicles. In the Hebrew Canon, the first book was Genesis and the last book was Chronicles. They contained all of the same books as the standard 39 books accepted by Protestants today, but they were just arranged differently. For example, all of the 12 minor prophets (Hosea through Malachi) were contained in one book. This is why there are only 24 books in the Hebrew Bible today. By Jesus referring to Abel and Zacharias, He was canvassing the entire Canon of the Hebrew Scriptures which included the same 39 books as Protestants accept today. Therefore, Jesus implicitly rejected the Apocrypha as Scripture.

And other than the Ethiopian Orthodox, no other denomination accepts Enoch.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clearly

Newbie
Mar 31, 2010
636
7
✟16,223.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Hi Deacon Dean;

I had forgotten that this thread existed and only remembered it when the email popped up that someone had posted here.


Do you mind if we examine your “facts”, one at a time for both accuracy and historical relevance?

For example, in your “fact” number one, you remind us that “The book of Enoch is not included in any Protestant version of the bible.”

I’m not sure what point you are trying to make by saying an early common era judao-christian text is not found in a protestant bible created fifteen centuries later. You seem to be trying to mix values and text from two entirely differing eras to try to make a point. We are speaking HISTORICALLY, and thus of a time before any popular version of any of the several christian canons had been suggested.

For example; NONE of the non synoptic books were included in marcion’s canon (and even that text was severely curtailed). One can use this fact to conclude that NO biblical text outside the synoptic book has sacred value and all who included them in subsequent canons were wrong in doing so.

Barnabas and hermas are not in “modern” western bibles though they are obviously included in 4-5th century sinaiticus, (one of the 4-5 most important uncials ever discovered). Barnabas and Hermas may not be in your bible, nor sacred to you, but they were in their bible and such text were sacred to the early christians who read the bibles that included them.


The early Judao-Christians had their own traditions and beliefs regarding the awaited messiah and the early texts they read form an important periscope into their understanding of the promised atonement of the Christ. To understand how such traditions and teachings were understood by the earliest judao-christians tells us much about what early christianity was like and how they understood so many of the doctrines the later christianities in their various forms started squabbling over ad nauseum.


The New Testament text makes use of and quotes from enochian literature such Quotes from enoch found in New Testament Jude (thus the protestants are reading from enoch when they read from new testament literature). The great apochyphologist Charles found over 128 quotes from Enoch in the New Testament (Thus when you are reading New Testament text, you ARE reading from enochian literature as well, you simply are unaware of where the quotes come from...).

So, if the protestants, 1500 years later no longer included enoch in their literature of belief , What is the relevance of this first point you are making to the literature of belief of the earliest Judao-Christians?


Clear
eivitzsiis
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jpark

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2008
5,019
181
✟21,382.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Book of Enoch.
Worth studying seriously?


Secrets of the Book of Enoch.

1. Son of Man named and revealed, even before time, sun, moon, star.

2. And it said sinners would be dragged off to Hell.. before time, sun, moon, stars where even created.

3. Orbital paths, equinoxes, six portals revealed. Constellations and workings of Heaven, understanding of seasons, phases of the moon, years, days, hours described.

4. Talks of Heaven, Hell, Paradise, Tree of Life. And Angels and Angelical hosts.

5. Enoch perfectly describes a black hole. And that black holes are the holding cell for fallen stars.

6. Enoch describes fallen angels mating with humans, creating Nephilium. Literal Giants, half-breeds.
He also describes dinosaurs.


Get you to thinking about what all is out there, waiting for Christians to discover. The most powerful Word from God are those that arent preached.
But, you also have to ponder why the occult and the freemasons use this book in their rituals. And the knowledge it provides.

Any thoughts?
#6 is the reason why I think the author of the book should be shot.
 
Upvote 0

SummaScriptura

Forever Newbie
May 30, 2007
6,986
1,051
Scam Francisco
Visit site
✟56,955.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
JesusRev-

I've read most of that "book" already and found several discrepancies that directly contradict God's Word. One of those is- It refers to there being "7 Heavens", where God's Word only refers to there being 3.<snip>
You got the wrong book, dude. Your reading the Secrets of Enoch. That book was not quoted in the New Testament. It was not found in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SummaScriptura

Forever Newbie
May 30, 2007
6,986
1,051
Scam Francisco
Visit site
✟56,955.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
<snip>6. Enoch describes fallen angels mating with humans, creating Nephilium. Literal Giants, half-breeds.<snip>
#6 is the reason why I think the author of the book should be shot.
So JPark, would you have St. Jude shot too? He wrote that angels in times past had commited fornication here:
Jude :6-7 (NASB) said:
And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day, just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh.
 
Upvote 0