Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't feel empathy for Charlie cause he's dead.The left goes on and on about empathy and how much empathy they have, and yet displayed a complete and total lack of empathy and compassion over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We got a good look at who they really are.
What is the evidence that you rhink he's talking about it in that manner?From what I gather, Charlie was talking about empathy being used as a political tool. Selective empathy. Only having empathy for those on your side of the political spectrum, but no empathy for those on the other side.
I also see it being used as a weapon. Show empathy or face the consequences. You can't demand empathy.
I think the idea of "hate the sin love the sinner" gets a lot more complex if you think empathy if a sin.I don't know for sure what Mr. Kirk intended, but there have been some recent books by conservative Evangelicals on the topic of empathy: "The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits", by Joe Rigney, and "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion", by Allie Beth Stuckey. I suspect Kirk may have had one or both of them in mind. I'm not going to be able to summarize their viewpoint fairly (I know I will end up caricaturing them, so I will refrain), but here are two relevant articles.
1) Albert Mohler interviews Joe Rigney. Note that both are favorable to the anti-empathy point of view.
The Sin of Empathy — A Conversation with Joe Rigney - AlbertMohler.com
Cultural commentary from a Biblical perspectivealbertmohler.com
2) An article from the AP, posted on PBS's website. This author is more impartial, but I think the writer is trying to be fair.
Is empathy a sin? Some conservative Christians argue it can be
Those Christians claim empathy can manipulate people into accepting what they see as sins, like abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights.www.pbs.org
The concern raised by some conservative Christians is that "empathy" can be misconstrued to mean validating or celebrating sinful actions. Empathy should not be confused with condoning sin or excusing unrighteous behavior.A quote from Chuck Kirk.
Now I look at this quote and I get seriously confused. I cannot understand why a person would have a problem with empathy.
How would the Good Samaritan Help someone that thinks their terrible without it?
How can Jesus heal someone without it?
In my view, empathy connects us and allow people sympathy to flow more greatly. It creates stronger bonds between strangers.
So help me understand how and WHY empathy is bad.
That's you. What about the rest?I don't feel empathy for Charlie cause he's dead.
I did clearly expressed empathy for his family because that was awful for them to be there.
But frankly I don't idol worship our political figures like the right so I can't really be the kind of empathetic you may need.
I'm sorry i let you down like that.
YES! Thank you. I agree 100%.The concern raised by some conservative Christians is that "empathy" can be misconstrued to mean validating or celebrating sinful actions. Empathy should not be confused with condoning sin or excusing unrighteous behavior.
We continuously point people to Jesus .... He is the only way.YES! Thank you. I agree 100%.
Also, the idea of feeling empathy for "Being repressed"....Christians could ACTUALLY feel empathy for gay folks on this front.
A true Christian call is antithetical to antithetical to quite a few American cultural constructs; and gay people get repressed.
We can find way to be empathetic with people; even people we disagree with, without condoning sin.
I agree. We can never know the sin of another as sin is in the will, subjective. We can judge objectively the act as good or evil.I think it is important to separate between the person and the actions.
When we're told to have empathy, it's way of trying to get us to stop speaking out against a culture of sin. It's just the latest tactic.The concern raised by some conservative Christians is that "empathy" can be misconstrued to mean validating or celebrating sinful actions. Empathy should not be confused with condoning sin or excusing unrighteous behavior.
That's you. What about the rest?
No it's not. The last several posts cleared that up.When we're told to have empathy, it's way of trying to get us to stop speaking out against a culture of sin. It's just the latest tactic.
On its own the feeling of empathy is neither good nor evil as it un-willed. However, if the feeling moves us to commit an evil act the then act and the feeling that preceded the act are both evil.The concern raised by some conservative Christians is that "empathy" can be misconstrued to mean validating or celebrating sinful actions. Empathy should not be confused with condoning sin or excusing unrighteous behavior.
Thank you for your in-depth response.
empathy(n.)
1908, modeled on German Einfühlung (from ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), which was coined 1858 by German philosopher Rudolf Lotze (1817-1881) as a translation of Greek empatheia "passion, state of emotion," from assimilated form of en "in" (see en- (2)) + pathos "feeling" (from PIE root *kwent(h)- "to suffer").So, is empathy a passion? Yes, it is.Empathy - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in 1908 from German Einfühlung (ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), derived from Greek empatheia meaning "passion, state of emotion," it denotes art apprec...www.etymonline.com
That does not seem to be a constructive way of looking at things. If there are issues of disagreement these are most likely to be solved by seeking to consider the matter from the other side, not by adopting a wholly dismissive attitude and position. Surely attempts to solve differences are more valuable than endless, entrenched bickering.When we're told to have empathy, it's way of trying to get us to stop speaking out against a culture of sin. It's just the latest tactic.
In some contexts, particularly that of “woke” subculture rhetoric, empathy is just a fancy code word for narcissistic behavior and demanding that other people cater to your personal feelings at the expense of logic and truth.A quote from Chuck Kirk.I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage.
Now I look at this quote and I get seriously confused. I cannot understand why a person would have a problem with empathy.
Therefore, empathy is a demand that I worship your emotions as God. It is idolatry. I will have none of it.
I spent some too-long posts processing my overpriced rage at empathetic narcissists already, so I don't see the need to repeat myself. Basically, a somewhat legitimate human attribute is being weaponized by narcs, which then reflects badly on the word. Political rhetoric is typically concise and doesn't really go into nuance.You could also go with “Some female parents and LGTBQ individuals don’t properly understand what empathy is and confuse empathy with narcissistic demands. This has led some pastors to distance themselves from the term “empathy” in order to avoid enabling these groups’ sin and supporting LGTBQ positions.” Now we have an objective thesis that can be argued in academic circles and justify paying theologians overpriced salaries for at least another year.
The other problem with empathy is that it's passive. You didn't choose to feel what the other person felt and respond with kindness or compassion. You just did, and it's the other person taking advantage of your subconscious/unconscious mind. That's why empathy is bad, because it's out of your control, and it either indicates that you are being manipulated or you have a disorder. You have to push back against the mirror-neuron-downloaded emotion in order to think clearly and act from your own beliefs again.So help me understand how and WHY empathy is bad.
Empathy is passive; compassion is active. Empathy is something that you experience; compassion is something that you DO, and it requires thought because you need to think about what the best course of action is.That's a good point. Let's ask: What is the difference between Empathy and Compassion? I'll let everyone else here work on finding out what they think the answer is.
The word empathy is just simply a replacement for the word tolerance.That does not seem to be a constructive way of looking at things. If there are issues of disagreement these are most likely to be solved by seeking to consider the matter from the other side, not by adopting a wholly dismissive attitude and position. Surely attempts to solve differences are more valuable than endless, entrenched bickering.
Thus I am seeking to understand the concerns that led you to make the above post. It seems you fear that demands of empathy are an invidious trick, a subterfuge, to enable the sinners to continue sinning. If my understanding is accurate, it does not solve the differences of our position, but at least it clarifies the problem. The alternative would have been a reactive attack on your position, which would have only deepened the rift.
So, I vote for empathy. I'd like to think you would give it serious consideration.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?