• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Emil Brunner

dms1972

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 26, 2013
5,337
1,447
✟772,021.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
So I have a couple of books by Emil Brunner, but have not studied his thought in any great depth.

He was a friend of Karl Barth but they disagreed over natural theology.

Alister McGrath did a biography of him a few years ago.

Here's picture of Brunner (on the left) and Barth.

5d28439822548_1.png


Any thoughts on the man and his writings.
 
Last edited:

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,870
21,061
Orlando, Florida
✟1,577,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Barth's sticking point was on Natural Theology indeed, and it seemed to come from a particularly sharp take on the Reformed religion, as far as Neo-Orthodox Protestant theologians go.

Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran, was also critical of natural theology, especially of the Liberal Protestant kind, but his more Lutheran-shaped Christology leaves more ambiguity, with Lutheranism's slightly more cosmic or mystical penumbra or shadow compared to some other strands of Protestantism. For Bonhoeffer, revelation is thoroughly dialectical and relational, involving our relationship to the world as much as it does to theological propositions or dogmas.

From what little I read about Brunner, it seems like the disagreement with Barth was similar. Barth focuses on divine transcendence almost exclusively, likely owing to his sharp take on the Reformed tradition, the idea that the "finite is not capable of the infinite" something that's very Zwinglian.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0