You are asking him to give up most of his weapons, he won't do it.You are free to take part in any discussion you like but it makes sense to use the correct terminology.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are asking him to give up most of his weapons, he won't do it.You are free to take part in any discussion you like but it makes sense to use the correct terminology.
We have some experts proposing an alternative explanation for what we observe:
New Theory: The Universe Isn't Expanding, It's Just Gaining Mass
“One cosmologist is proposing that the universe isn't actually expanding, as the standard theory goes. Instead, the redshift effects astronomers see could mean that everything is just gaining more mass …”
Ref.: http://www.popsci.com/science/artic...universe-isnt-expanding-its-just-gaining-mass
Fair enough.
We also know that empty space cannot stretch or expand, so all they did was exchange one absurdity for another. They then had to create a new absurdity called dark-energy in order to make sense of the absurdities they already created, and the absurdities just keep piling on.
It is similar to creating a new lie in order to cover up a former lie.
Argumentum ad populum. Yawn.
I continue to point out your error.
Will you respond with a yawn when Jesus Christ returns to this planet with ten thousands angels?
New International Version
For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. [1 Thessalonians 4:16]
You gave him a title that many historians and scholars will disagree with. There probably was a Jesus, though there are more and more serious historians that are beginning to doubt even this claim.
We know there was no Noah's Ark, that story was refuted even before the theory of evolution came along.
Will you still believe your sources when fire from heaven follows the Second Coming of Jesus Christ?
New International Version
People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all. It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed.[Luke 17:30]
New International Version
They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God's people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them. [Revelation 20:9]
Assuming there was such a person as Jesus Christ.
So you are saying that actually instead of trying to see more, when your views are challenged in the slightest way you just become more entrenched.
Maybe your confusion of evolution with abiogenesis is your fault and not ours?
I am not confusing anything. Your pet theory leads me to a cul-de-sac which forces me to make a u-turn. I am willing to bet that science will never provide a plausible explanation for the origin of life, the fine tuning of the universe, or the intricate DNA design.
Will you respond with a yawn when Yikataa returns to gather his flock?Will you respond with a yawn when Jesus Christ returns to this planet with ten thousands angels?
We will all lose the one and only thing we have, life, because there is nothing else.I have chosen my historians with great care. Nevertheless, suppose I am wrong. What is the most I can loose when my life is over? How about you?
So, when Christians in the Middle East are being killed or driven from their homes by the Islamic State, and praying to God for help, he ignores them. When your wife prays to God to make your Oldsmobile start, he grants her prayer. Is that what you are saying?What I am saying is that my evidence is stronger every time I compare with yours.
Let me relate an experience we had some years ago.
One day we were coming back from Mexico, but our old Oldsmobile would not start. After half an hour of failed attempts the car started, and I told my wife that we would not stop until we got home, but when we were close to Temecula, I noticed that the gas gauge was almost at empty. We stopped for gas, but the car refused to start.
We kept trying on and off for four hours. The tow truck mechanic inspected the engine and his verdict was that the timing was broken and the car would never start. We were ready to call a taxi and find a motel to spend the night. My wife said: “Let me try one more time.” She said, “In the name of the Lord” and turned the ignition. The car started.
We got home and, and the next morning I tried to start the car to no avail. I had the car towed to the mechanic, who after looking at the engine reported to me that the timing was broken and that there was no way to get it started.
Explain this to me with words I can understand! I can cite additional experiences that I had in the past. My dad had similar guidance from above.
What evidence?What "they" have done is accommodate the evidence.
The current understanding will stand because it's an ideology, not science.Until you have a better accommodation of the evidence that stands up to mathematical and observational consistency with the evidence, the current understanding will stand.
You expect me to take that seriously?