• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

"Embedded Age" Requires Fake Fossils

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zosimus

Non-Christian non-evolution believer
Oct 3, 2013
1,656
33
Lima, Peru
✟24,500.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Does this mean, you don't "know" anything?
Well, it's always possible that I know things. The point is that we cannot differentiate between what we truly know and what we think we know, but is not actually known. If, for example, I look at grass and I think it's green, it could equally be true that the grass is grue or greena. Maybe the grass really IS green. What do I know?
 
Upvote 0

Zosimus

Non-Christian non-evolution believer
Oct 3, 2013
1,656
33
Lima, Peru
✟24,500.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Common descent of all life is established by a) The common life based chemistry including DNA as the source of heredity, and b) the nested hierarchy of life, AKA the tree of life, that shows living things related in grander and grander groupings, making the grouping of all into the general catagory "life" the logical conclusion.
That's very interesting... the "logical conclusion" you say. Please lay out the premises and line of reasoning that lead to that logical conclusion.
 
Upvote 0

crjmurray

The Bear. Not The Bull.
Dec 17, 2014
4,490
1,146
Lake Ouachita
✟16,029.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
As you are reading this post, look just to the left where you will see my handle (Zosimus) then scan down to the word "Faith" and look slightly to the right where you will read: Agnostic.

Would it surprise you, therefore, to hear that I am agnostic about whether Darwinism is right vs. whether God created everything?

I don't give a crap about your beliefs. I just wondered if you had an alternative explanation.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Well, it's always possible that I know things. The point is that we cannot differentiate between what we truly know and what we think we know, but is not actually known. If, for example, I look at grass and I think it's green, it could equally be true that the grass is grue or greena. Maybe the grass really IS green. What do I know?

I ask because, you don't post like someone who doesn't think they can know anything.
 
Upvote 0

Zosimus

Non-Christian non-evolution believer
Oct 3, 2013
1,656
33
Lima, Peru
✟24,500.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Do you have evidence to back your explanation?
You have, once again, missed the point. I am not arguing that God caused the Big Bang. I am arguing that not being able to field an alternate explanation does not mean that the explanation in question must be true.

Evidence is irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The Big Bang exploded because God did it.

Do you have an alternate explanation?
"The Big Bang exploded because Bob did it."

Doesn't really add to our currently model of BB and cosmology, but definitely begs for more questions.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
You have, once again, missed the point. I am not arguing that God caused the Big Bang. I am arguing that not being able to field an alternate explanation does not mean that the explanation in question must be true.

Not having an explanation means that we don't have an explanation. A bare assertion pulled out of a hat is irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

Zosimus

Non-Christian non-evolution believer
Oct 3, 2013
1,656
33
Lima, Peru
✟24,500.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Not having an explanation means that we don't have an explanation. A bare assertion pulled out of a hat is irrelevant.
Exactly – such as bare assertions that scientific findings support the theory of common descent.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Exactly – such as bare assertions that scientific findings support the theory of common descent.

Those aren't assertions. They have been demonstrated in real populations. We can observe natural selection in real populations. We have observed that isolated lab mouse populations form phylogenies:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1800920/

All of the mechanisms have been demonstrated.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Herman Hedning

Hiking is fun
Mar 2, 2004
503,928
1,577
N 57° 44', E 12° 00'
Visit site
✟791,060.00
Faith
Humanist
I subscribe to epistemological nihilism. That means that I believe that nothing can be known, and that we shouldn't even try until a workable framework for knowing things can be constructed.
But since nothing can be known, we can not know how to construct a framework for knowing things. Ergo, it is impossible to know anything, ever. A bleak world view, no?
 
Upvote 0

Zosimus

Non-Christian non-evolution believer
Oct 3, 2013
1,656
33
Lima, Peru
✟24,500.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
How do you know that?
You didn't catch the reference. What color is grue?

If I said, "I know that the Answer to The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything is 42" would you also say:
"How do you know that?"
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
But since nothing can be known, we can not know how to construct a framework for knowing things. Ergo, it is impossible to know anything, ever. A bleak world view, no?

How can he actually know that nothing can be known?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.