Mostly blind post.
It seems to me that every time a guy feels like he's been humbled for whatever reason, he feels as though he has been castrated. And I just don't get it.
I don't seem to fit this.
A girl thinks you're stupid: You feel like she cut off your penis. Why is that? That's not where you keep your brain. An insult to your intelligence shouldn't have any relation at all to the state of your, er... 'manhood' (as the romance novelists put it).
Nor this. If I ever have a problem with someone 'being smarter than I am' - I could care less about the gender of the person who is 'smarter'. Clearly, I'm not the smartest thing around - nor should it be expected.
A woman doesn't let you pay for her meal: You feel emasculated. Why? Were you planning on paying for the meal with sexual favors?
Nope, wouldn't feel emasculated.
Was I planning on paying for the meal with sexual favors? <-- that's a potentially inflammatory statement. Oh, and no. No I was not.
A woman shows you up in front of the boss: You feel inferior and then emasculated. Why is that? Your skills at your job (unless you're a porn star) don't have anything to do with the phallus.
Nope, not emasculated BECAUSE said person who potentially 'showed me up' is a female. Not emasculated at all. If there are issues, they are related - on my behalf - to a constant drive to be the best (gender excluded).
And you are right, job skills are irrelevant to the phallus.
Isn't it interesting that there isn't any similar word for women? (At least that I can now think of - if someone has some insight on this, please share). When a woman is degraded, humiliated, shown-up, or treated as inferior she doesn't complain about feeling hysterectomied.
Strictly speaking, emasculate may be used for females as well - as weakening somebody or something: to deprive somebody or something of effectiveness, spirit, or force.
Further, to 'feel emasculated' is not to 'feel castrated' - unless one has actually been castrated. It is to feel weakened, deprived, etc <-- and emasculation in the sense you have used in the original post, has nothing to do with the phallus directly.
Maybe this is just something I, as a woman, will never understand. The relationship between men and their penises is incomprehensible to women?
I do not think this is relevant really in the way originally sought to be.
[/QUOTE]
The few times I've 'felt' emasculated or 'felt there was an attempt to make me feel emasculated' - are often simple, ridiculously immature situations.
Primary and most frequent example (I'm quite serious with this type of example) -
Say one is hanging out in a third grade classroom, interacting with the other students as a student one's self. Suddenly, without initiating, asking for, 'having it coming', and/or degrading any females in action what so ever - "Girls rule, boys drool."
Call me an idiot - things like this (as well as the opposing view that "Boys rule, girls drool" said to me that people around me were not doing much thinking... and clearly, what interest have 'you', however you are in saying such things?
I was a normal weird kid, or a weird normal kid, or whatever.
Meanwhile, the same concept of "Girls rule, boys drool" and the accompanying reversal of the nouns seems to have made it to adulthood.
It's like "I must now attempt to attack you using something that has no bearing on your person, your skills, who you are... except what God has created you to be. You're a girl so you must be inferior to me at X, Y and Z...or in everything" or "Actually not attacking you at all, just making place for myself above you... see... now don't I feel better?"
I never found this relevant to life.
None should feel nor be approached about being better or inferior due to gender.
Respect is necessary.
Respect is a genderless quality to be acquired....
and how interesting that to be a complete Christian,
so much of life is applied to the male and the female,
the men and the women.
Is it ALTOGETHER DIFFERENT for Men to 'love their wives'
and women to 'respect their husbands' (This applies of course
in non-marital contexts as well)?
Does it not seem...that the context for 'love' and 'respect' here
are words weighted with 'connotation' rather than simple definition...
hence different aspects of agape?
If we agape, the 'love and respect' is included.
Clearly it isn't about men loving and women respecting,
rather connotatively exploring mandated solutions to
aspects of Godly love that each gender for various
underlying heart issue reasons have a tendency
to forgo.
My idea has not been explained fully as I have some doubt
as to whether I'm actually capable of explaining it thoroughly
in a way that does not further complicate or confuse understanding...
though I feel the dull and semi-aching pain of incompleteness of
what might be an uplifting and encouraging idea.
