Election fraud

[LostMarbels]

What someone is “willing to do” is rather irrelevant in a court of law. It is what someone “did do” that is relevant. You’ll have to prove Democrats did something illegal. Good luck.

Really? In the era of Kavanaugh amongst other incidents you think we cannot find sentiment within the courts? There are people in those courtrooms. What makes you so sure they will side with you?

Keep forgetting that. The Democrats have slighted, and marginalized a lot of people. How you think things like that do not affect judgments is beyond me... Go into a court with exonerating evidence but jeer at the judge. Call him names and flip him off. See what happens.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Really? In the era of Kavanaugh amongst other incidents you think we cannot find sentiment within the courts? There are people in those courtrooms. What makes you so sure they will side with you?

Keep forgetting that. The Democrats have slighted, and marginalized a lot of people. How you think things like that do not affect judgments is beyond me... Go into a court with exonerating evidence but jeer at the judge. Call him names and flip him off. See what happens.

Maybe Trump should have appointed fewer drunk teen sex offenders to the court.

 

[LostMarbels]

Maybe Trump should have appointed fewer drunk teen sex offenders to the court.

You know what it means when someone has to resort to insults?

Thank you....

 

[Gene2memE]

I see the professional reality deniers are still going strong. Keep up the sterling work, lads and lasses.

 

[Hans Blaster]

You know what it means when someone has to resort to insults?

Thank you....

Those were facts. I don't have any evidence the future Justice engaged in drunken sexual assaults after his teen years. During them, well that's a different story. You may not believe the claims, but I do.

 

[SimplyMe]

That means nothing to the case/s at hand.

It means every bit as much as your claim that the Democrats have been trying to remove Trump. The point remains, courts require evidence -- the cases of the Trump campaign so far have merely offered conjecture, not evidence, which is why they've consistently lost these cases.

 

[VirOptimus]

Really? In the era of Kavanaugh amongst other incidents you think we cannot find sentiment within the courts? There are people in those courtrooms. What makes you so sure they will side with you?

Keep forgetting that. The Democrats have slighted, and marginalized a lot of people. How you think things like that do not affect judgments is beyond me... Go into a court with exonerating evidence but jeer at the judge. Call him names and flip him off. See what happens.

I think you know nothing about how court cases work.

 

[LostMarbels]

Those were facts. I don't have any evidence the future Justice engaged in drunken sexual assaults after his teen years. During them, well that's a different story. You may not believe the claims, but I do.

The Biden camp cheated and was caught. That is what we are dealing with right now.

 

[LostMarbels]

It means every bit as much as your claim that the Democrats have been trying to remove Trump. The point remains, courts require evidence -- the cases of the Trump campaign so far have merely offered conjecture, not evidence, which is why they've consistently lost these cases.

There is evidence. The argument... or rather belief is that the courts will refute it with as much conviction as others supporting Biden has.

 

[SimplyMe]

There is evidence. The argument... or rather belief is that the courts will refute it with as much conviction as others supporting Biden has.

There hasn't been so far. Hearsay and "evidence" based on "statistical improbabilities" don't stand up in court, where judges require hard facts. Worse, much of the evidence even turns out to be false, as I've pointed out with the list of Nevada "illegal voters" -- which has a large number of military and their family who voted legally.

 

[essentialsaltes]

The isotopes are yet unfounded

While I'm glad you seem to have dropped this shiny toy (but not yet thrown it out), aren't you concerned that you are chasing after countless other shiny toys being dangled into your vision?

Here's the proof Biden cheated!

No, here's the proof Biden cheated!

Can't we just chill? The lawsuits are ongoing and we'll see whether any have any merit. But going around talking about proof that Biden cheated is putting the cart before the horse.

 

[7thKeeper]

The Biden camp cheated and was caught. That is what we are dealing with right now.

Except that you are lying here. I mean, just blatantly lying. Or can you offer any evidence that they cheated? Should be really easy for you since you claim they were caught.

 

[LostMarbels]

While I'm glad you seem to have dropped this shiny toy (but not yet thrown it out), aren't you concerned that you are chasing after countless other shiny toys being dangled into your vision?

With constant calls concerning science and evidence, people are amazed I find something that has neither been proven nor disproven as possible.

But going around talking about proof that Biden cheated is putting the cart before the horse.

There is proof all over the place. In data trends, algorithms, software that monitors for fraud, affidavits, testimonies, video footage.... Plenty.... plenty, plenty, plenty.

 

[essentialsaltes]

With constant calls concerning science and evidence, people are amazed I find something that has neither been proven nor disproven as possible.

You, apparently approvingly, quoted a fact check that called it bogus.

 

[LostMarbels]

You, apparently approvingly, quoted a fact check that called it bogus.

No kidding. There is a point where people become so combative they aren't even listening to the person they are confronting.

 

[LostMarbels]

Going to look into this:

 

[essentialsaltes]

No kidding. There is a point where people become so combative they aren't even listening to the person they are confronting.

Things that are bogus are not possible.

 

[LostMarbels]

Things that are bogus are not possible.

Why do we have to keep doing this? It is almost as if you can convince me of something everything stops in its tracks. What hasn't been debunked in this administration? I absolutely agree it is unfounded.

 

[essentialsaltes]

I absolutely agree it is unfounded.

Well, when I told you as much, you said that I flippantly "blew something off that concerns Trump. We are going to find a lot of that in the coming days.... where individuals will be blindsided by information they 'debunked' 'refuted' so on...."

What did the coming days bring? It was not I who was blindsided by information.

We'll see what transpires in the coming days. Certification. Electoral College. Inauguration Day.

 

[cow451]

No it is not a mathematical impossibility. Math has nothing to do with it. Every ballot in existence could only have one box checked and it would be possible.

You mean a ballot can have non-zero boxes checked?