Given her history and actions as supervisor, the label fits. Regardless of her motivation or belief in invalid legal theories, she broke the law. A a law that you had the audacity to compare to Jim Crow laws.
With that, I'm done responding to you.
As the judge opined:
"...an impassioned argument to order the board to act that afternoon came from its lone Democratic member, Ann English. She had dissented from Monday’s vote to delay the ministerial move.
She warned the judge that Crosby intended to use Friday’s meeting as “sort of a smackdown between the secretary of state and the election deniers that he has on the agenda.” Crosby has indicated that he has concerns about equipment used in the election.
The judge, in ordering the board to convene Thursday, said such concerns were “not a reason to delay a canvass.” He found that state law “unambiguously requires” counties to certify the results by Nov. 28, unless vote tabulation is incomplete.
btw, if the supervisor had concerns regarding the equipment, he should have raised them before the election. After all, he, as a county supervisor, is accountable for the equipment.