Ebola

[AV1611VET]

I guess AV is more interesting than Ebola.

ouch

 

[HitchSlap]

I won't be here.

Neither will I.

 

[AV1611VET]

Neither will I.

I know where I'll be -- do you know where you'll be?

 

[digitalgoth]

I know where I'll be -- do you know where you'll be?

Cremated?

 

[AV1611VET]

Cremated?

That's a verb, not a noun.

 

[HitchSlap]

I know where I'll be -- do you know where you'll be?

Aw, that's cute.

 

[sfs]

Sorry SFS.

Are you with KHS?

I'm not sure -- what's KHS?

 

[bhsmte]

I'm not sure -- what's KHS?

The science group mentioned in the article you posted.

 

[sfs]

I see that Liberia has now reported 11 Ebola cases among health care workers, 10 of them fatal.

 

[Aureus]

I see that Liberia has now reported 11 Ebola cases among health care workers, 10 of them fatal.

, that is what is so damn scary about Ebola. Lethal and so damn easy to transmit even among those people taking all the precautions.

 

[Gottservant]

As much as I like the sentiment that you are "doing something", the idea that this is somehow "original" or "patented" by Evolution is a delusion.

Perhaps when you find that the parameters of Evolution are open to question, moreso than proponents are willing to share, you will revise your hate speech against anything under the more generic banner of intelligent design.

Hiding behind works does you no good, if you are a lewd exhibitionist personality.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Prior to the time of Isaac Newton, scientists were more in tune with the Scriptures.

After Isaac Newton, scientists began going downhill.

That's hilarious. Considering that generally, Newton marks the start of modern science, with Galileo being an early bird.

So, once science started to be really good at making progress and explaining natural phenomena... that's when you feel the process went downhill...

This is amazing.

How detached from reality can you be, I wonder...

Mindboggling, really.

So, is it safe to say that you feel that the "scientists" of old, who treated desease with an exorcism or by drilling holes in your skull to let the "evil spirits" out, were more "in tune with god", as opposed to modern scientists who develop meds to target and attack specific germs - who you feel are a product of "evil"?




In the words of that comic store guy from The Simpsons: "There is no emoticon, for what I'm feeling..."

 

[DogmaHunter]

As much as I like the sentiment that you are "doing something", the idea that this is somehow "original" or "patented" by Evolution is a delusion.

Perhaps when you find that the parameters of Evolution are open to question, moreso than proponents are willing to share, you will revise your hate speech against anything under the more generic banner of intelligent design.

Hiding behind works does you no good, if you are a lewd exhibitionist personality.

Are you saying that the "intelligent designer" is the one mutating the virus to make sure that it stays a step ahead of potential cures?

What a douchebag!!

 

[AV1611VET]

Mindboggling, really.

I'm sure everything we think, do, or say is "mindboggling" with you guys.

Fake surprise, fake indignation ... you guys are just ... well ... fakes.

Wolves in sheeps' clothing, actually.

 

[Gottservant]

Are you saying that the "intelligent designer" is the one mutating the virus to make sure that it stays a step ahead of potential cures?

What a douchebag!!

Are you saying that if we didn't have Evolution's nonsense, scientists would just not attempt to discover a cure for ebola?

Give me a break.

 

[DogmaHunter]

I'm sure everything we think, do, or say is "mindboggling" with you guys.

Fake surprise, fake indignation ... you guys are just ... well ... fakes.

Wolves in sheeps' clothing, actually.

Funny how you simple ignored the points made in the post and instead replied to my irrelevant opinion of the actual point.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Are you saying that if we didn't have Evolution's nonsense, scientists would just not attempt to discover a cure for ebola?

Give me a break.

If there was no evolution, science could discover one cure and stick with it. But there is evolution. So, to stick to a cliche, theyneed to develop a new flu shot every year.

If you develop a cure for a virus, one of two things can happen:
1. you successfully eradicate it, meaning the virus goes extinct
2. it works for a while, after which the virus evolves and becomes immune to the cure. Now, you can go back to drawing board to tinker with your no-longer-working medicine to make it work again.

 

[AV1611VET]

Funny how you simple ignored the points made in the post and instead replied to my irrelevant opinion of the actual point.

Ain't that weird?

Funny why I do that, isn't it?

Maybe I've concluded you're all a bunch of fake actors?

 

[Gottservant]

If there was no evolution, science could discover one cure and stick with it. But there is evolution. So, to stick to a cliche, theyneed to develop a new flu shot every year.

If you develop a cure for a virus, one of two things can happen:
1. you successfully eradicate it, meaning the virus goes extinct
2. it works for a while, after which the virus evolves and becomes immune to the cure. Now, you can go back to drawing board to tinker with your no-longer-working medicine to make it work again.

As intelligent as that sounds, all you are doing is mashing up a bunch of terms in a completely arbitrary paradigm.

I say again, do you honestly think that science would somehow fail to come up with a cure for ebola, if evolution wasn't around?

Do you really expect us to believe that the only way for God to matter to Science, is if he can improve on trial and error, as if He did not in fact invent the process of trial and error itself to create Peace?

How about a perfect trial and a perfect error? Ever thought of that?

 

[DogmaHunter]

Ain't that weird?

Funny why I do that, isn't it?

Maybe I've concluded you're all a bunch of fake actors?

paranoid much?
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean... A well... It can probably take a hike