Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not as if anyone here had no clue about what the OP meant.'Easy to be an atheist if you agnore science'
"agnore"????
You've bought into the classic god of the gaps argument, which is a fallacy. Can you at least understand why some may think it's dishonest to insert their own personal god as an explanation, when we don't have a natural answer?
Actually, my understanding of science is what made it easy to be an atheist.
"Nothing" You don't seem to have a grasp on what that word means and does not mean.
We have a profound understanding of how life we see now and in the fossil record came to be. It evolved from a primordial life form. How that life form came into existence doesn't even effect our understanding of evolution, much less determine if we know "something" or "nothing" about life.
What science demonstrates that a deity exists? Even the author of the article states in the first sentence that scientists don't know for sure.That's because you ignore it -- just as the OP says.
Thanks for the QED.
You have nothing profound, I've seen it, it falls apart pretty much immediately.
If the beginning of life has no effect, then you don't have the whole story, hence you don't have the origin of life, and again, what you do have is junk, not even logical fallacy. Remember, we already went over that, then when I showed were it broke down, y'all went into this thing about me not understanding simple English, just as you are trying to do here....one excuse after another. It was actually pretty funny, took me forever to get you to put something on the table and for some strange reason no one would, then when you finally did, you got just what I think you expected...the very reason you were reluctant to put it out there to begin with. Are you here now to add to your embarrassment?
Real science is testable, you don't need millions of years.
Please explain...
You live in a fantasy world. You have addressed nothing. You have debunked nothing. You have contributed nothing. You have embarrassed no one... other than yourself. This entire paragraph is vacuous rhetoric and empty boasting.
Not true, I got the jokes completely...
..the ones that were based on assumption each time I looked into your ridiculous evidence..
Details please? If you have a comment to make on my post, make it, otherwise I'll assume that a baseless accusation.
It's hilarious when people complain about logical fallacies being pointed out and then go on to post a logical fallacy.
(Hint - abiogenesis is not "something coming out of nowhere". That's a straw man.)
Just as we know gravity exists by seeing its effects, we should know God exists by seeing His effects:What science demonstrates that a deity exists? Even the author of the article states in the first sentence that scientists don't know for sure.
Just as we know gravity exists by seeing its effects, we should know God exists by seeing His effects:
Churches, holidays, iconography, songs, hymns, carols, organizations, bumper stickers, debates, Jesus time (BC/AD), martyrs, testimonies, witnesses, missionaries, Bibles, books, stores, clubs, etc. should all serve as evidence of God's existence.
Wow, you are tremendously dishonest. Here's my post without your dishonest excision where I did just that.
I'll take that to mean: "I don't wish to continue talking to you, beca/use it hurts my case..."
If they are going to pretend something happened that did not, they do need the millions of years for the lies to get lost in. IOW, they would prove their lies but it just so happens they have a universal excuse not to.
Right, you embarrassed yourself. You were there when it happened. Denial? I guess so.
The entire paragraph? Did I not try for a long time to get you all to put something on the table? were you not reluctant to do that? Let's start there, are either of those 2 questions not factual?
Or, tell you what, put it back up here, and we can do a replay.
Nope, still no details. Where then does it start if it doesn't come from nowhere?
Dishonest? You all show your insecurities each time you throw that around.
Discredit you opponent with good solid argument , not made up things that have nothing to do with the subject.
Yes, gravity exists. Yes, we can describe it's effects using mathematics. But it's origin or how it actually functions.....no one can explain.
There is not a single experiment that can.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?