• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Easiest Defense of Sola Scriptura

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
QUOTE="samir, post: 70130969, member: 382932"]The RCC has never employed the sword of men.
Of course they did and do.
First they made a legal claim of proprietorship over the earth and the souls thereon, with Unam Sanctum. That defined The Two Swords doctrine that laid the groundwork for genocide with the Doctrine of Discovery.


As long as the church is teaching the truth I'm going to follow it regardless of what other people do. Would you leave your denomination is you found out there was a sinner in your congregation?
I am post - denominational.
If i found out that sinner was the leader and was involved in world conquest, my heart would leave it faster than my feet could.
 
Upvote 0

samir

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2015
2,274
580
us
✟18,067.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Of course they did and do.
First they made a legal claim of proprietorship over the earth and the souls thereon, with Unam Sanctum. That defined The Two Swords doctrine that laid the groundwork for genocide with the Doctrine of Discovery.

Thanks for showing the RCC did not employ the sword of men. That document shows the civil government, not the church, is to employ the sword.



I am post - denominational.
If i found out that sinner was the leader and was involved in world conquest, my heart would leave it faster than my feet could.

Jesus commanded his disciples to make disciples of all nations so there is nothing wrong with the RCC trying to convert everyone to Christ.

Matthew 28:19-20 (NKJV) "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you"
 
  • Like
Reactions: fhansen
Upvote 0

AnticipateHisComing

Newbie
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2013
2,787
574
✟148,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus Christ did leave the apostles with the OT canon. Luke 24.
But the books aren't named, specifically. The question is, why? The Church used the Canon which was read in liturgical celebrations. Because they were used there, they were considered divinely inspired and useful for instruction in holiness.

You need to learn that scripture exists without a church putting a stamp on it and saying this is canon. There may have been multiple canons of the OT during Jesus time. That did not concern Jesus. I wonder why it is so important to the Catholics that they think their church special for creating a table of contents 1700 years ago. Jesus managed somehow to find what was true in scripture and used that to teach his disciples. The NT apostles did the same. We know the important books of OT scriptures because of what? Because Jesus and the apostles quoted them and the message they spoke was congruent to it.

So now we still have multiple canons and various translations based on a variety of source materials. Despite all these differences, the message of salvation still comes through them. If Jesus were here today, I think he would not have a problem with it. If one argues that Jesus still heads the Church/all saints then he has so allowed it as sufficient for his gospel, just as he didn't have a concern with multiple canons in his day.

I'm going to follow scripture and keep the tradition of the church. There is no other alternative since without church tradition there is no bible.
And with slight of hand you equate your Bible created 1700 years ago with scripture and only possible because of your church's traditions. Oh how many things are wrong with such a boast.

Scripture existed the moment it was spoken/written. Most of the NT are letters written by apostles. Others are recorded accounts. Regardless, they were all written down in the 1st century. They were not traditions passed down through word of mouth until the Catholic Church came to power and "Romanized" everything. If the RCC could figure out what was true scripture in the 4th century and the apostles could do the same in the 1st century, then everyone in between and after could do the same. Certainly it does provide some benefit when scriptures are mass produced for there to be an established canon. Before then, the apostles, were taught which texts were true scriptures.

Further look to the OT and Daniel for an example of how scripture is immediately recognized as being the truth. Daniel, a prophet, recognized Jeremiah as a prophet that spoke the word of the Lord. Daniel testifies that Jeremiah's words were recorded and circulated such that he recognized it as scripture. The church of that time was in exile. It did not create a new canon and add Jeremiah's book to it such that Daniel could read it less than seventy years later. So if in the OT times a prophet could recognize true scripture immediately, than the NT apostles and later followers could also recognize true scripture without a canon from some authoritarian institution.

Daniel 9:2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the Lord given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years.
 
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Absolutely not! That is abhorrent. Please retract your slander and false witness against me. I meant exactly what I said, killing heretics. Heretics are not Christians. They are enemies of Christ who made a choice to pervert and corrupt the true gospel and spread their errors, killing other souls with their lying tongue. If serial killers are put to death to save innocent lives, how much more should heretical preachers be put to death to save innocent souls. What's worse - killing bodies or killing souls?

Is it well documented that the heretics you allude to who had been killed by the religious establishment of the day, were in fact Christians. Just because a religious institution labels them as heretics it doesn't mean that they are not Christians, does it?

A significant portion of historians agree that some 100 million plus Christians had been killed due to persecution by the relgious authority in the Middle Ages. The saying no one could buy or sell except he have the mark of the beast, pretty much starved out any opposition to the man beast enterprise and those who didn't succumb to starvation were ended with a sharp instrument or the witches flames.

Here is the excerpt from a reliable university source.....


The crusades�began about 1100, the inquisition�in 1231, and the Protestant Reformation�in 1517.� In between these dates persecutions�were most intense.� The population�growth from 800 to 900 was 9.1%, from 900 to1000 was 10.4%, from 1000 to 1100 was 20.8%, and from 1100 to 1200 was 12.5%.�� The population growth from 1500 to 1600 was 28.2%, but without the 30 million killed in the New World�it would have been 35.3%.� Averaging these numbers gives a population growth of 19.75% during periods of relatively little persecution.� From 1200 to 1300 the population growth was 0%, from 1300 to 1400 it was �2.8%, and from 1400 to 1500 it was 21.4%.� This corresponds to deviations from the average of �19.75%, -22.55%, and 1.65%.� Attributing these to persecutions and the Black Death�gives a total of 146.5 million people that died in excess of what one would expect based on average population growth.� The Black Death is estimated to have killed a quarter of Europe�s population, and about 40 million people total.� Subtracting this from 146.5 million gives over 100 million excess deaths due to persecution during the Middle Ages.� This figure is a mute testimony to numerous persecutions all over the world that were never recorded and soon forgotten, except for their effect on world population figures.� This is a low estimate because there were persecutions from 1100 to 1200 and from 1500 to 1600 as well, which would not only increase the total, but would give a higher average population growth in the absence of persecution.� It may be reasonable to subtract about 55 million from this figure due to the estimated 40 million who died in the Mongol conquests�and the 17 million killed by Timur Lenk.

Beginning the computation of persecutions�at 1100 instead of 1200, the average population�growth would be 22.2% in the absence of persecution.� The deficit in population growth from 1100 to 1200 would be 9.7%, from 1200 to 1300 would be 22.2%, from 1300 to 1400 would be 25%, and from 1400 to 1500 would be 0.8%.� This amounts to 203.7 million persons in all.� Subtracting 40 million for the Black Death�gives over 160 million persons killed by persecutions in the Middle Ages.� Of course there were also persecutions before 1100 and after 1500 that are not being considered, such as the 15 million Indians�that died in the New World�and the estimated 15 million or more killed in war and the inquisition�from 1518 to 1548 and onwards.� Perhaps 55 million should be subtracted from this quantity, as well.

However, the population�growth in Europe�presents a different picture.� In 1000 AD, the population was about 36 million, then grew by 22 percent by 1100 and by 31 percent by 1200 and by 36 percent by 1300, reaching about 79 million.� In 1400 it was about 60 million due to the Black Death�and in 1500 about 81 million and 100 million in 1600.� The population growth from 400 to 800 was significantly slower.� To explain this increasing population growth in the light of persecution, recall that whenever the Papacy extended its dominion, as in South American or the Crusades, there was much bloodshed.� The same would have been true as the Papacy extended its dominion over Europe.� Afterwards the persecutions�within Europe would have decreased and the attention of the Papacy would have been directed more towards extending its domain beyond Europe.� But even a population growth rate of 36 percent is not necessarily high; the entire world population grew by almost 50 percent between 1700 and 1800.

From 1400 to 1500 persecutions�in Europe�had largely died down, and the population�growth rate was nearly 36 percent.� The population growth from 1200 to 1300 was almost identical, suggesting that persecutions had largely died down then as well because most of the �heretics� had been eliminated already and the Inquisition�had not really gotten started.� Therefore the value of 36 percent from 1200 to 1300 can be taken as a base value in the absence of persecution.� Thus the deficits in population growth due to persecution and the Black Death�would have been 14 percent from 1000 to 1100, 5 percent from 1100 to 1200, none from 1200 to 1300, 60 percent from 1300 to 1400, none from 1400 to 1500, and 12 percent from 1500 to 1600.� Adding these up gives a total of 63.6 million people, of whom 20 million can be attributed to the Black Death and 43.6 million to persecution.� Actually, because Europe had less than one fourth of the total world population, it seems doubtful that half of the worldwide deaths from the Black Death would have occurred in Europe.� A figure of 10 million instead of 20 million for this would mean 53.6 million deaths were attributable to persecution.� This is not too far from the common estimate of 50 million killed in Europe.� Adding in 15 million for the New World�almost exactly duplicates Brownlee�s estimate of 68.5 million.� Of course, the total would have been higher because there was also persecution when the population growth was 36 percent.�� In addition, the persecutions before 1000 when the Papacy was extending its domain over Europe are not counted.

Concerning the Black Death, Robertson�writes


This �Black Death� (as it was called) is said to have carried off at least a fourth of the population�in the countries which it visited.

[footnote] This is Hecker�s estimate, and he puts the whole loss at 25,000,000 (29).� Others say a third, three-fifths, or more. � The �Eulogium Historiarum� makes the loss in England�one-fifth (iii. 213).


-- James C. Robertson, History of the Christian Church, Vol. VII, The Young Churchman Co., 1904, pp. 161-162.


The wide divergence in the figures shows a lack of real data about the magnitude of the loss.� However, the figure for England, dealing with a smaller area, is probably more reliable.

Despite the differences, there are remarkable similarities in the population�growth patterns in Europe�and the world as a whole from 1000 to 1800.� In all centuries except the twelfth through fourteenth, the population growths were very close, except possibly for the fifteenth.� The population growths of the fourteenth century would have been very close but for the Black Death.� This suggests that there was some common driving force for these rates of population growth.� It seems unlikely that this could have been climactic or political or technological in nature because of the considerable diversity all over the world.� However, the global reach and policies of the Papacy provides such a unifying factor.� An increase in persecutions�would affect population trends the world over.� Furthermore, the worldwide decline in the power of the Papacy from the sixteenth century onwards would have had a global effect.

The differences in population�growth in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries may be attributable to the tremendous growth of the Waldenses, who became like the sand of the sea, without number.� By following a Biblical lifestyle, they would have had low infant mortality and disease rates, long lives, and substantial wealth.� The entire world population grew by nearly a factor of four in the twentieth century, and the Waldenses may have been increasing at about the same rate in Europe.� Thus there could have been many millions of Waldenses throughout Europe.� Such a large population group would have posed a tremendous threat to the Papacy and would have motivated the setting up of the Inquisition.� Even in the thirteenth century, millions of them may have been killed in the Inquisition, in addition to the 25 million or more estimated to be killed by persecution in Europein the fourteenth century.

These population�figures may actually underestimate the death toll by a significant factor.� If someone is killed who is past child bearing age, his death will likely have only a temporary effect on the population.� Someone who is killed after having half of their children will have half of the long term effect on the population as someone who is killed before having any of their children, on the average.� Therefore, the total death toll could easily be double that indicated above.� Furthermore, the possessions of those who die will be redistributed among those who remain, which will tend to cause the population to grow somewhat faster than normal.� In addition, the base figure for population growth could easily have been taken as 50 percent or higher instead of the values given above.� This is especially true because of many millions, perhaps 45 million, killed in Europe in the Counter-Reformation�after 1517 and before 1700.� Therefore the population figures permit, and even invite, the conclusion that the death toll due to persecution in the Middle Ages�is astronomical, and many times larger than 50 million.

Here is the link if your interested in reading it completely........

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/estimates.html

Therefore friend it is not a slander but a statement of fact that you can't dismiss, that is, the heretics you claim to be not Christains were in fact Christains. Do you know that this forum has policy to not call a Christian a heretic or Anti-Christian, regardless of whether they are living today or have passed on. It would be sin to even consider those murdered Christains as heretics and not Christians, where these innocent souls had been murdered at the hands of the 2 horned lamb/Christ like beast/man relgious institution that spoke and acted like a dragon as John tells us in Revelation. These so called heretics you speak of are the true martyrs for Christ. Don't fear men, fear Christ who will use those very words against you in his heavenly court, alongside of him those so called heretics that you labeled, who you will be shocked to find out that they are his jury. It is not looking good for you friend and it will not go down well for you.

I plead with you to refrain from calling Christains who had been martyred for Christ as heretics for this is sin. I know that you hate sin, so stop doing it please for the love of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Without tradition there is no bible. I had to rely on tradition to quote from scripture.

So you are now implying that tradition came before the written word. Let me re-emphasises that scripture is the written word, that is the testimony of the Living Word Jesus Christ of Nazereth and is the good news, the gospel that was instructed of the disciples to preach as part and parcel of the great commission.

Now you are saying that the tradition arising from the relgious establishment that you hold dearly to heart, is in fact preeminent over and above the very gospel of Jesus Christ.

Hmmmmm..............

I have no words that can explain how wrong you are. In fact if tradition arising from a relgious institution did come before the testimony of Jesus Christ, that is the very gospel that he commanded his disciples to preach from, then you have just unwittingly categorised that relgious establishment as an entity separate to Christ. If the tradition you speak of is the I Am before the testimony of Jesus Christ who is the I Am, then the conclusion that one can make from your statement is that we have a different relgious entity which is separate to Christianity and which came before Christianity. I have just dissected and reinterpreted the consequences of your position arising from your statement that.....

without tradition there is no bible.
 
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
False. The commandment prohibits murder, not killing.



Interesting opinion but other than Protestant denominations I don't know any religious establishments that has done that.

Is it not declared by the Lord himself......

Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.

Protestants in their defence of being targeted and killed by the religious establishment who wielded the sword would ensure that the Lord' statement above held true, that is those who were drawing the sword will also be opposed with the sword. This by no means is a defence of the acts that Protestants did to defend themselves, rather it shows the works of the relgious establishment that is far from the fruits of the Spirit. Once an alleged relgious establishment claims infallibility and is capable of such horrendous crimes against humanity, then it ceases to be a part of the body of Christ.

The relgious establishment has used their many so called bad popes/Chief Priest princes as scapegoats, so that they can still claim infallibility and sinlessness of the relgious institution itself. It almost begs belief that a head of a relgious enterprise can from a historical point of fact act according to the works of Satan, yet the establishment who made that office possible for him is immune to any blame what so ever. It is almost conceivable that they have made a relgious institution and likened it to God, that is sinless, that is without blame and having no accountability to anything that anyone does within its establishment. This is idolatry at its best.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Of course they did and do.
First they made a legal claim of proprietorship over the earth and the souls thereon, with Unam Sanctum. That defined The Two Swords doctrine that laid the groundwork for genocide with the Doctrine of Discovery.



I am post - denominational.
If i found out that sinner was the leader and was involved in world conquest, my heart would leave it faster than my feet could.

You see here is my point, that is they liken their religious establishment to God, that is sinless, that is without blame and infallible, having no accountability of anything that anyone does within it, including their pope/chief priest prince. It is almost the relgious entity exists without the need for people, that is they have made a god onto themselves to worship and it can do no wrong, so this is the idol of worship that they have setup, the abomination that maketh desolate for all to worship and to revere, more so than the testimony of the Son Jesus Christ as if it is in itself God himself. From a historical point of view, only mad and delusional men could have schemed up such a monumental lie that now many generations have been brainwashed into. Snap out of it people, a relgious institution is not God, it is not sinless, it is not infallible, it is not living, it is not the way the truth and the life, for you are to come to Jesus and be married to him and not your institution that you call mother. This sad story is the raising of Jezebel who takes the spot light away from the Son.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rick Otto
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks for showing the RCC did not employ the sword of men. That document shows the civil government, not the church, is to employ the sword.





Jesus commanded his disciples to make disciples of all nations so there is nothing wrong with the RCC trying to convert everyone to Christ.

Matthew 28:19-20 (NKJV) "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you"

In the same way Jezebel set the ground work and nudged King Ahab a little to do her dirty work. What makes this relgious institution so likened to a women who uses her external influences to execute her will.

Why did you take @Rick Otto out of context?

Of course they did and do.
First they made a legal claim of proprietorship over the earth and the souls thereon, with Unam Sanctum. That defined The Two Swords doctrine that laid the groundwork for genocide with the Doctrine of Discovery.

Don't you get it, the so called infallible and murderous mother relgious institution setup the policy for its members of its own establishment who served in the government and its high places to do unspeakable crimes. Therefore to lay the groundwork means to open the door for what it intended to do with her opposition.

Offcourse Jezebel couldn't arm wrestle her opposition in order to establish her barbaric dreams, so she setup the framework in Ahab's mind to use his governmental forces to carry out the massacres. God not only charged Ahab for his crimes as an accomplice with Jezebel, but he left Jezebel until last. When God laid hands on Jezebel he ensured that no part of her was left and that all were fed to the dogs of war.

Thus sayeth the Lord of hosts..........

As for Jezebel, dogs will devour her on the plot of ground at Jezreel, and no one will bury her.'" Then he opened the door and ran. (2 Kings 9:10)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rick Otto
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
We have all been born into this mother of all lies and were brainwashed to serve Jezebel, the murderous mother who kills her children.

2Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt. 3Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever. 4But you, Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end. Many will go here and there to increase knowledge.”

From the time that the daily sacrifice is abolished and the abomination that causes desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days. 12Blessed is the one who waits for and reaches the end of the 1,335 days.

We are living in those very symbolic years within the abomination that causes desolation/destruction that was setup through legislative councils, to make the relgious institution the way, the truth and the life, as if it is Jesus Christ and therefore by doing this, the daily sacrifice who is the lamb of God Jesus Christ was removed and in his place was established Jezebel the alleged infallible mother.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Berean777

Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
Feb 12, 2014
3,283
586
✟29,509.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
They remain Protestants.

It is not a football game friend. We are not playing and barracking for colours of jerseys.

If it was truly an infallible enterprise as your leaders harp on about, then it would have stayed complete, but no, it was fractured, it fell apart at the seem and all the bells and whistles that proclaimed its glory, was dispersed amongst the nations of the world, who would then carry on the works of Christ.

Wisdom comes by ways of historical evidence and history shows that the relgious enterprise has been emptied of its once pious glory, much like a husbandless widow, she has sought to join herself to the hoards of the world and to cleave onto them on her last dying breath, as she yells and screams come to me world come to my salvation, for I have been abandoned, I once had children, but my children abandoned me and now I must adopt others who are not mine.

Let me prophesy onto you, that even the most zealous who defended her will abandon her and leave her to those hoards who will eat away at her slowly until she looses all the purity and glory that she once lavished in, in those tumultuous days.

1Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on my holy hill. Let all who live in the land tremble, for the day of the Lord is coming. It is close at hand

To my brothers and sisters in Christ where they be Catholic or others, the Lord will deliver you, he will not allow you to go off into captivity.
 
Upvote 0

AnticipateHisComing

Newbie
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2013
2,787
574
✟148,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How so? Jesus said to obey them despite their hypocrisy so how were any of the verses quoted relevant?
If you read all of scripture or at least all of Matthew you would understand. Your Matthew 23:3 teaches to obey the religious leaders. But you are wrong to think one should blindly follow everything a religious leader says; for Jesus had previously taught when to not follow the traditions of the religious leaders. In Matthew 15:2-3 Jesus' disciples clearly DID NOT follow everything the religious leaders said. The Pharisees questioned Jesus on this. Jesus said their traditions broke God's command; and so Jesus presented a way to test and determine if the what the religious leaders said was to be followed. Jesus said to test traditions against God's word in scripture.

Clearly here is yet another example where scripture is held above traditions and religious leaders.
 
Upvote 0

AnticipateHisComing

Newbie
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2013
2,787
574
✟148,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Although I don't think there is anything wrong with killing heretics,
You sound like a radical Muslim; now I understand the source of your dislike of Protestants.
Even so, it still wouldn't prove the RCC wasn't the church Jesus founded because killing heretics was a practice, not a tradition. The most it would prove is that there were sinners in the RCC.
Practice or tradition; oh how you vacillate between words as if it made a difference in what the leadership of a church did. It does not matter what word you call it. The RCC was in error. Just as the chief priest condemned Jesus to death to protect their authority/power, so the RCC did the same.

To profess that such evil atrocities have no reflection of the heart/spirit of the one orchestrating them is absurd. While claiming to maintaining truth in the church, their actions belied their understanding of truth.

John 8:39 “Abraham is our father,” they answered.
“If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would[c] do what Abraham did. 40 As it is,
you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41 You are doing the works of your own father.”
“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
 
Upvote 0

AnticipateHisComing

Newbie
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2013
2,787
574
✟148,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Without tradition there is no bible. I had to rely on tradition to quote from scripture.
Keep on repeating that falsehood, maybe some will believe it. Do you know what a tradition is? A tradition is something passed down. You maintain that the RCC does it perfectly. Understand that if it was by perfect tradition that the canon was determined, than the RCC would not have had to have multiple councils with debate and testimony to determine what books should have been in the NT. It would have been maintained true and passed down without error. There never would have been 300 years of questioning which books should have been included in the NT.

Now the RCC was certainly involved in the setting of the canon. You may say that the Holy Spirit guided the process. You may even say that the church consulted the teachings/traditions of various bishops, but in the end the canon was determined by council and was not a singular true tradition passed down from the original apostles and writers of the books in the NT.

Lastly, the books of the NT were letters/records written in the 1st century and not traditions.
 
Upvote 0

AnticipateHisComing

Newbie
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2013
2,787
574
✟148,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You're the ones who can't agree as to the Canon of Scripture. It was there for nearly 1200 years, and you 'reformers' decided to take out several books.
No disagreement in the NT. Disagreement in OT which was as it was in Jesus' day. Somehow Jesus did not think it important to set it straight. I guess the RCC knows better. And in all those books taken out by the reformers, is the path to salvation lost; anything necessary there, any critical doctrines there?

The canon of the Bible refers to the definitive list of the books which are considered to be divine revelation and included therein. A canon distinguishes what is revealed and divine from what is not revealed and human. "Canon" (Greek kanon) means a reed; a straight rod or bar; a measuring stick; something serving to determine, rule, or measure.
And how is this different than what I quoted from Wikipedia?

A biblical canon or canon of scripture[1] is a list of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture.​

There was no canon of scripture in the early Church; there was no Bible. The Bible is the book of the Church; she is not the Church of the Bible. It was the Church--her leadership, faithful people--guided by the authority of the Spirit of Truth which discovered the books inspired by God in their writing. The Church did not create the canon; she discerned the canon. Fixed canons of the Old and New Testaments, hence the Bible, were not known much before the end of the 2nd and early 3rd century.
And so you now profess, the canon not a tradition, but something discerned.

So much for your previous answer to my question for a tradition necessary for salvation that is not in scripture.

I guess we are back to square one. Do you have another answer to my question?
 
Upvote 0

sculleywr

Orthodox Colitis Survivor
Jul 23, 2011
7,789
683
Starke, FL
✟30,069.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Others
You need to read scripture to see what it says. If you did you would understand that both the apostles and Jesus had and quoted it as unquestioned truth. Are you a Christian; I have no idea what kind of mindset you have with the Christ didn't teach it[scripture] comment.

Matthew 22:29 Jesus replied, “You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.
Luke 24:27 And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.
2 Timothy 3:15 and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.

So you admit the answers to my question as asinine, I guess that includes yours. For your defense you declare the question asinine. You started this discussion with your post that scripture is incomplete. I asked a very simple question. Show me one "tradition" that completes scripture. You make a bold assertion that scripture is incomplete. I ask for evidence of it being insufficient for salvation. You can't and no Catholic has; so you now say the question is asinine/invalid. But, you did attempt an answer. Only when it is apparent that the answer, as you called it, is asinine do you now say the question is also asinine. What a winning defense of your belief; Not.

Do you know what year it is? Are you living in the 3rd century before the Bible was declared canon? When you made an assertion that scripture is incomplete, you were talking about the present day. You did not say scripture 1600 years ago was incomplete. You use this as some kind of defense for traditions today and why we can't follow SS. Can you even understand that your one "tradition" of 1600 years ago has been converted to written form and is no longer a tradition passed down. In fact it is in the Bible, which we now call Scripture.
So, Sculley, you now follow Sola Scriptura.


God's word recorded in the Bible is a blessing to the world. We have had this for 1600 years. It is what we now call scripture. Stop living in the past and thinking that you deserve inerrancy forever because of one good deed. And, the canon wasn't even a tradition passed down from Jesus through the apostles. This is the question; you fail to answer, as others have.
Your logic could use some more logic. Without the Canon, there is no Scripture. The Canon defines Scripture. It is a manmade Tradition that has authority to fundamentally change Scripture itself. That is the exact OPPOSITE of the stance of Sola Scriptura.

According to you, the Bible includes the Canon, which wasn't given by the Apostles, the Prophets, or Christ. And since we're using that stance, it means that Athanasius, the person who wrote the Canon of the New Testament, is equal in authority to the Apostles. Since he used Tradition, and also directly stated, in the same letter as the Canon, that the Wisdom of Solomon is also Scripture.

Your entire statement is based on false premises. Scripture claims it is not complete. It says that in the book of John. It's right there in the text. You claim that Scripture is lying when it says that it isn't able to hold everything that Christ taught.

The fact is that your question is a logical fallacy called a loaded question. You may as well ask me why I hate the Scripture. It's more subtle, but it is a loaded question nonetheless. It is asinine because it ASSUMES the end that YOU want. It ASSUMES that Scripture is separate from Tradition, and it isn't.

Here are things you need to know to worship God that aren't in Scripture:

1. How often do you offer Eucharist?
2. What should accompany the Eucharist?
3. How does one perform a Baptism?
4. How does one perform a Wedding?

You must be able to answer these questions with the same amount of detail that the Old Testament answered questions about the worship of God that you find in the Torah. You can't. Are you telling me that they were necessary in the past and God just didn't care about it for the rest of us?

The fact is that Scripture leaves a lot of things out because it was not intended to be complete and comprehensive. If it were, we would have no need of catechisms, systematic theologies, or creeds.
 
Upvote 0