• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Dwarves and Leviticus 21:16-21: Are the Handicapped Kept From Offering to the Lord?

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Saw a powerful documentary recently on the issue of dwarves in Auschwitz - entitled Perspectives - Warwick Davis - The Seven Dwarfs of Auschwitz (2013)

Warwick Davis & the Seven Dwarves of Auschwitz Trailer - YouTube



For reference, one can go to the following:


It was fascinating learning of the history of dwarves in Auschwitz - paticularly those who were Jewish dwarves - and all that they went through.

As intensive as it was to deal with life as a dwarf (just as it is with many today - for you really don't see many synagogues or churches seeming to be full of them) - it really hit home with me on how difficult it may have been in Biblical times in light of what scripture notes:
Leviticus 21:16-21
16 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 17 “Speak to Aaron, saying: ‘No man of your descendants in succeeding generations, who has any defect, may approach to offer the bread of his God. 18 For any man who has a defect shall not approach: a man blind or lame, who has a marred face or any limb too long, 19 a man who has a broken foot or broken hand, 20 or is a hunchback or a dwarf, or a man who has a defect in his eye, or eczema or scab, or is a eunuch.


In these verses God is telling Moses to tell Aaron that any one with a defect may not offer the food of his God. And I've heard of others thinking that he is basically saying anyone with a deformity is not worthy of being in God's presence right. Essentially, the passage seemed to restrict those in Aaron’s line from functioning as priests if they have any kind of defect physically. The reason that might have made sense to the Israelites was that like the sacrifices they offered that had to be perfect, so the priests who offered them had to be “perfect” in order to please God.

Of course, we know that God was also preparing His people to receive the real/ultimate sacrifice for our sins and high priest to offer the sacrifice – Yeshua. And as one who often healed those with disabilities (Matthew 15:29-31 ) and even brought them into the temple to be healed when he cleansed it (Matthew 21:13 ), connecting others with the Lord that may not have felt able to be close to Him was a big deal. But it does seem perplexing as to why the Lord would not allow others to come into the temple who were born with deformities when others having all kinds of issues of sin would also have been deformed as well..

Had our father Adam not sinned before us, no one would have a blemish, a mutilated face, blind eyes, or an itching disease - and in many ways, those traits are physical markers that we are a sinful people who are not worthy of approaching Him. Of course it is true that those with handicaps or physical blemishes are not worthy of approaching God, but that's because none of us are - and one has to wonder: why did God allow priests without physical blemishes to approach Him if they were just as sinful?

It does seem that God had a high concern for the disabled - Moses declares in Deuteronomy 27:18, “Cursed is the man who leads the blind astray on the road.”

And yet while in Leviticus 19:14 we are commanded “not to curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind,” two chapters later we read Leviticus 21: 16-21, which outlines physical requirements for the priests who will lead public worship. The priests who lift their hands in worship and participate in the sacrifices must be physically perfect. Apparently, Maimonides explains this rule by writing “most people do not estimate a person by his true form, but by his limbs and his clothing, and the Temple should be held in the highest regard” (Guide to the Perplexed, 3:45.) Essentially, people are ableist, and this requirement is in place because of our shortcomings, not because there’s anything wrong with the person with a disability.

Working with people who have had disabilities (including a dear sister whose son passed away with one), the issue has been something I've wrestled with and I am processing on what to make of it fully.

For reference:

Representations of Disability in Leviticus 21:16-23 - Dissertations
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CherubRam

HannibalFlavius

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2013
4,206
200
Houston
✟5,329.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Very interesting Thread G.


It makes me remember something I need to look up about the lame and the blind, doesn't God hate them?



^_^


O well, I remember something like that and I will get back with it when I look it up.


But I do see the lame as people who cannot walk righteously in good works, and the blind as people who will not see the truth, and love to love a lie, and or just people who are indifferent, luke warm.

But great thread, I feel like I am born again with all these new good threads I want to get into.
 
Upvote 0

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
5,128
1,155
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟180,058.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Very interesting Thread G.


It makes me remember something I need to look up about the lame and the blind, doesn't God hate them?



^_^


O well, I remember something like that and I will get back with it when I look it up.


But I do see the lame as people who cannot walk righteously in good works, and the blind as people who will not see the truth, and love to love a lie, and or just people who are indifferent, luke warm.

But great thread, I feel like I am born again with all these new good threads I want to get into.

Look up the word translated "dwarf" while you all are at it, (and the difference between toldot-generations and dorot-generations is critical because everyone has his unseen blemished ones which are not allowed when we go up). :)
 
Upvote 0

HannibalFlavius

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2013
4,206
200
Houston
✟5,329.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Look up the word translated "dwarf" while you all are at it, (and the difference between toldot-generations and dorot-generations is critical because everyone has his unseen blemished ones which are not allowed when we go up). :)

Thanks Daq, I'll do that.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I have been wondering about the same thing myself.
Glad to know I wasn't the only one wrestling with it. How long have you been thinking on it?
 
Upvote 0

Norbert L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 1, 2009
2,856
1,065
✟582,890.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I'm wondering if there were logistical and practical reasons for the instruction. Like it wasn't too long ago the police force where I live had a height restriction for male applicants. If a man was shorter they were considered not having the stature for confronting crimes that were life threatening. It was NOT because they were viewed as being a lesser class citizen of the country.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I'm wondering if there were logistical and practical reasons for the instruction. Like it wasn't too long ago the police force where I live had a height restriction for male applicants. If a man was shorter they were considered not having the stature for confronting crimes that were life threatening. It was NOT because they were viewed as being a lesser class citizen of the country.
That is definitely something I've not considered before - as height restrictions could have made a difference in the temple when seeing the ways that being tall enough for certain tasks was crucial so as to not make mistakes....

Good points...
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Gxg (G²);65094804 said:
Glad to know I wasn't the only one wrestling with it. How long have you been thinking on it?

I have been think about it for the past decade, but have not taken the time to think things through.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟209,750.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I have been think about it for the past decade, but have not taken the time to think things through.
Good while to process....

Talked with someone awhile back who had a disability (specifically, a hunchback) and it made me pause to consider how those in Ancient Israel would have felt if born into such positions - being in line to be priests and yet having the disability disqualify them from ministry with the other sons of Aaron.
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Gxg (G²);65105024 said:
Good while to process....

Talked with someone awhile back who had a disability (specifically, a hunchback) and it made me pause to consider how those in Ancient Israel would have felt if born into such positions - being in line to be priests and yet having the disability disqualify them from ministry with the other sons of Aaron.
Busy with more important things.
I wonder why damaged JUNK is a problem? Thoughts
 
Upvote 0