Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD.: computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes (Michigan

[CitizenD]

Dr. Shiva to President Trump, via Twitter...

Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21

MIT is a place where that SCIENCE stuff happens, right?

I'm sure the guy running a write-in campaign has 100% of his marbles.

 

[apogee]

wonder if this is still online somewhere....(from 2017)

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Live on War Room on Infowars

 

[Tanj]

Rebuttal the first:
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai & The Danger Of Data Charlatans

 

[apogee]

Just to clarify....although he didn't actually invent email, or have any involvement in its development, i think he might actually own the copyright on a computer program called 'EMAIL'

 

[Arcangl86]

Rebuttal the first:
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai & The Danger Of Data Charlatans

I'm glad he summarized the argument, which seems to be unaware of the existence of split ticket voting.

 

[bekkilyn]

Did you click the link?

Yes, because if this guy could claim *scien*tology too, he would!

 

[BobRyan]

Dr. Shiva to President Trump, via Twitter...

Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21

MIT is a place where that SCIENCE stuff happens, right?

Wow!

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Dr. Shiva to President Trump, via Twitter...

Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716?s=21

MIT is a place where that SCIENCE stuff happens, right?

When did twitter become a news station? I looked up Shiva Ayyaduri, As far as I can tell. He spreads lies. People like this is why America so screwed up.

 

[Occams Barber]

Wow!

I'd read a few more posts before you get too excited about this.

OB

 

[Liam Hayden]

I don't care about his credentials or his past. What is the actual evidence?

 

[Hans Blaster]

I believe there would have to be actual science involved before it could be trusted or not trusted.

A Ph.D. in what? If it's art history, it is irrelevant.

 

[keith99]

I want to claim I invented Email! In the Early 1970s I was able to communicate with students at other colleges by using PIP on a DEC PDP-10. We woiuld not have had to do that except for them disabling the .TA ability which to be fair was meant to allow techs to communicate when fixing problems. not for college students to use as a private chat room.

Of course I really did not do anything that was not inherent in PIP so Harrison "Dit" Morse deserves teh credit for creating EMAIL.

 

[Erik Nelson]

This guy makes an offer of his analysis on his twitter feed to be "transparent" but doesn't even present that analysis.

• Math shows no anomalies in Democratic precincts
• Whereas, in Republican precincts, progressively more Republican precincts had progressively more votes shifted from Trump to Biden
• The shifts could be explained as the operation of a well-known "vote weighting" feature of Voting Machines

When you get claims like this, especially from Twitter, it pays to do a little basic investigation into the background of the person involved. Anybody can claim anything on Twitter

Same same with CF also?

 

[GoldenBoy89]

This guy’s a quack and a fraud that has been encouraging people to go against basic public health recommendations throughout the pandemic. I wouldn’t trust him to give me the time of day.

 

[Hans Blaster]

• Math shows no anomalies in Democratic precincts
• Whereas, in Republican precincts, progressively more Republican precincts had progressively more votes shifted from Trump to Biden
• The shifts could be explained as the operation of a well-known "vote weighting" feature of Voting Machines

View attachment 288599
View attachment 288600

Same same with CF also?

His whole "analysis" is being too stupid to realize that some people split tickets and that some conservatives & Republicans *HATE* Trump and didn't vote for him. That's all it is. Not evidence of moved votes, but a trend in voting that shows that a non-negligible number of Republican voters voted for Republicans at all positions *except* President.

 

[Erik Nelson]

A Ph.D. in what? If it's art history, it is irrelevant.

As stated in the very beginning of the video:

Ayyadurai holds four degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), including a Ph.D. in biological engineering, and is a Fulbright grant recipient (Wikipedia)​

 

[Erik Nelson]

trend in voting that shows that a non-negligible number of Republican voters voted for Republicans at all positions *except* President.

... in a suspiciously regular pattern (as if affected by a well-known Voting Machine algorithm)

 

[Hans Blaster]

As stated in the very beginning of the video:

Ayyadurai holds four degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), including a Ph.D. in biological engineering, and is a Fulbright grant recipient (Wikipedia)​

Engineering, so not a scientist. Also, not a statistician. (Why would I watch video on this?)

 

[Erik Nelson]

• Michigan precincts were ranked according to (otherwise) "straight ticket" Republican voting percentage (x-axis)

• Trump's percentage then compared relative to "straight ticket" percentage (Trump % - straight ticket % = y-axis)

• actual total Trump percentage (secondary y-axis in red on the right side of edited graph below) versus (otherwise) "straight ticket" percentage shows the (overall statewide average) expected one-to-one trend (Trump % = straight ticket %) up to about 20% Republican ticket votes in the precinct

• After that, half of all additional votes for Trump (above the ~20% threshold) were switched to Biden

• First 20% of a precinct's total allowed votes, if for Trump, were "allowed through" (hence, Trump's early election night leads?)

• Subsequent Trump votes were switched to Biden with 50-50 probability (hence Biden's late night increasing comeback?)

• e.g. if 80-100% of a precinct had voted for Trump, algorithm would have reported 50-60% vote for Trump -- about 3/5ths
• no precincts reported zero votes for Trump, who even received a respectable 40-45-50% in a few polling places, but (as it were) "surplus votes" profiting Trump were skimmed for Biden's cause

 

[Hans Blaster]

... in a suspiciously regular pattern (as if affected by a well-known Voting Machine algorithm)

A pattern as simple as X% of republican voters voted for Biden instead of Trump, but otherwise for other Republicans. The gap is bigger for more Republican precincts *BECAUSE THE HAVE MORE REPUBLICANS*.

[I didn't write the "quote" you had for me, that was inside quote box from me quoting you. Don't do that.]