Don't like the implications?

[Speedwell]

No I don't. That is the whole point. In doing what you said, we call it: speculation.

You may see that kind of thing at a scale of cell or sub-cell. But, that is all you have. The rests are speculations.

But in any case, speciation has been observed both in the lab and in the field.

 

[juvenissun]

But in any case, speciation has been observed both in the lab and in the field.

If evolution were true, why do you have to boast about that? What kind of achievement is that?

 

[Speedwell]

It is not a "boast"--it was an answer to this post

Evolution is a myth.
How many life species we know? How many case on the evolution of life species have we observed?
A dumb can see what a myth it is.

 

[PsychoSarah]

You did not say "why".

I did say why; the differences arose from evolving within different environments. The cause is the why, no more, no less.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Evolution is a myth.
How many life species we know? How many case on the evolution of life species have we observed?
A dumb can see what a myth it is.

-_- evolution is a continuous process. Humans are evolving with each successive generation, as is every other species on this planet.

 

[sfs]

No I don't.

Then, as I previously suggested, you should learn something about the topic, instead of lecturing me on things you don't understand.

 

[juvenissun]

I did say why; the differences arose from evolving within different environments. The cause is the why, no more, no less.

Too many exceptions in both way (same environment, different race and same race, different environment). So, it is a very unsatisfactory explanation.

 

[juvenissun]

-_- evolution is a continuous process. Humans are evolving with each successive generation, as is every other species on this planet.

Because it takes too much time to be observed, so it is a myth.

 

[juvenissun]

Then, as I previously suggested, you should learn something about the topic, instead of lecturing me on things you don't understand.

I did not, can not and will not lecture you. I am not that stupid yet. Neither do I have the mind to go back to study biology. All I am doing here is to ask you question and hope you can teach me a little bit with a language I can understand.

You failed to do that. I bet I can do a much better job if you were in my shoes.

 

[Speedwell]

I did not, can not and will not lecture you. I am not that stupid yet. Neither do I have the mind to go back to study biology. All I am doing here is to ask you question and hope you can teach me a little bit with a language I can understand.

You failed to do that. I bet I can do a much better job if you were in my shoes.

Perhaps we don't understand the kind of information you are looking for. I thought the race question was answered reasonably satifactorily (for a chatroom). What do you feel the answer lacked?

 

[juvenissun]

Perhaps we don't understand the kind of information you are looking for. I thought the race question was answered reasonably satifactorily (for a chatroom). What do you feel the answer lacked?

Those answers do not have a rigorous scientific quality. They are just chats.

Are there black Africans originated outside Africa? Why not?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Too many exceptions in both way (same environment, different race and same race, different environment). So, it is a very unsatisfactory explanation.

Please give a specific example.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Because it takes too much time to be observed, so it is a myth.

Nobody has ever observed Pluto completing a full orbit.
Its orbit actually takes LONGER then we have known about the dwarf's existence, so how could we even observe it?
Not to mention that even if we would have known about it for long enough, it takes longer then a human lifetime. So no single human could ever observe it completing an orbit.

So therefor, it is a myth that Pluto can complete an orbit.

~juve logic.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Are there black Africans originated outside Africa?

No.

Why not?

Because black africans originated in africa.

Why would or should black africans evolve anywhere but in africa?
In fact, if you WOULD find black africans that originated OUTSIDE of africa, that would pose a real problem for evolution theory.

Or an asian tribe that evolved in southern france. Same thing.

Do you have such an example? Off course you don't.
Evolution, after all, predicts that you won't find such examples.

 

[juvenissun]

No.



Because black africans originated in africa.

Why would or should black africans evolve anywhere but in africa?
In fact, if you WOULD find black africans that originated OUTSIDE of africa, that would pose a real problem for evolution theory.

Or an asian tribe that evolved in southern france. Same thing.

Do you have such an example? Off course you don't.
Evolution, after all, predicts that you won't find such examples.

Not I want to ignore you. 1. Your scientific argument is simply too poor in quality. 2. You will reply my good-will scientific explanation with political talk. So, sorry. When I see a sincere scientific argument from you, I will reply.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Not I want to ignore you. 1. Your scientific argument is simply too poor in quality.

I didn't give you any argument, so I wonder what you are gabbering about...

2. You will reply my good-will scientific explanation with political talk.

What "political talk"? When have I ever responded to a scientific subject with "political talk"?

So, sorry. When I see a sincere scientific argument from you, I will reply.

How about when I ask you a question?

Like, for example:
Why would or should black africans evolve outside of africa?


Or like in post 172, where I asked you to give specific examples of these "exceptions" you keep talking about? I asked you about such examples before and I am still waiting.

 

[Speedwell]

In fact, the current theory is that we all originated in Africa, so very likely it is lighter skin which evolved later outside of Africa, higher levels of melanin being retained where it provided some advantage--as in the aboriginal population of Australia.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Not I want to ignore you. 1. Your scientific argument is simply too poor in quality. 2. You will reply my good-will scientific explanation with political talk. So, sorry. When I see a sincere scientific argument from you, I will reply.

Translation from juvenissun speak: "I don't understand any of this so I shall hand-wave it away and ignore it."

Bottom line: you WERE given a scientific explanation. Just because you don't like it, or understand it, does not mean that they are wrong.

 

[sfs]

Not I want to ignore you. 1. Your scientific argument is simply too poor in quality. 2. You will reply my good-will scientific explanation with political talk. So, sorry. When I see a sincere scientific argument from you, I will reply.

The answers you were given in this thread were summaries based on a wealth of published scientific results. If you think they are unscientific, then the problem lies in you, not in the arguments.

 

[juvenissun]

Why would or should black africans evolve outside of africa?

Black African is a tag of a race.
Why should that race only be evolved in Africa?