• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Don't Fall for this Liberal Trickery

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,357
10,783
US
✟1,583,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
NEW YORK — Former Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon of Missouri is joining No Labels ‘ increasingly contentious effort to lay the groundwork for a moderate third-party presidential ticket in the 2024 election.

Nixon, a 67-year-old lawyer, is stepping back into national politics for the first time since leaving office in 2017 and will serve as No Labels’ director of ballot integrity. He said in an interview that he was drawn to the role after learning that well-funded groups aligned with Democrats were working to stop No Labels from securing ballot access in key states.

He said that those seeking to block the group’s right to appear on the presidential ballot are attacking a pillar of American democracy.

While No Labels has yet to nominate candidates for president and vice president, its leadership insists there is a path to victory for a centrist third-party ticket “if the two parties select unreasonably divisive presidential nominees.”

No Labels’ leadership has promised a series of checks and balances that would allow the organization to withdraw its presidential ticket if it appears the group’s participation would help Trump win. No Labels has not outlined a detailed plan about that, and leaders acknowledge privately there is some urgency to come out with their specific safeguards, which would vary state by state. They intend to do so by “early fall.”

 

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You could try a different browser; but here is a novel idea: Try reading the OP first.
Interesting implication that there's something wrong with me personally because the OP failed to explain how the thread title was in any way related to the quoted article. Sounds a bit like a personal attack rather than using facts and reasonable inferences from them to explain why my post was in error.
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,718
16,828
Fort Smith
✟1,439,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
A recent Monmouth poll showed Biden soundly beating Trump even if a third party joins in.
47-40 in a two man race. 40-34 in a three-person race.
Manchin won't appeal to mostly young progressive climate-conscious voters. While they think Biden is too old and Trump too crooked they don't want a dream-quashing coal king as a sub.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,357
10,783
US
✟1,583,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Interesting implication that there's something wrong with me personally because the OP failed to explain how the thread title was in any way related to the quoted article. Sounds a bit like a personal attack rather than using facts and reasonable inferences from them to explain why my post was in error.
Don't confuse your inferences with my implications. Now can we stop making this personal; and discuss the OP?
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Don't confuse your inferences with my implications. Now can we stop making this personal; and discuss the OP?
Hmm, asserting that I'm personally confused about the thread and then asking to stop making this personal.

And all the while still no explanation for how the thread title is related to the right wing propaganda source quoted in the op.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,357
10,783
US
✟1,583,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Hmm, asserting that I'm personally confused about the thread and then asking to stop making this personal.

And all the while still no explanation for how the thread title is related to the right wing propaganda source quoted in the op.
No Labels’ leadership has promised a series of checks and balances that would allow the organization to withdraw its presidential ticket if it appears the group’s participation would help Trump win.
Clearly No Labels isn't putting forth a candidate in good faith to the Democratic process. These Democrats are simply trying to split the Republican vote, to further the Liberal agendas of the Democrats.

The title of this thread serves to alert Conservatives to this trickery.
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,458
5,855
52
Florida
✟310,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
LOL, this is funny. Trying to pull an old switcharoo. My sources are telling me that No Labels is more closely aligned with Republican/MAGA platforms and attempting to trick moderates to vote for more conservative candidates.

I'll also note that ghost candidates to siphon votes (FL) and elected persons switching parties after winning (NC, GA, WV, LA, NY) have many more examples from the right.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,357
10,783
US
✟1,583,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
LOL, this is funny. Trying to pull an old switcharoo. My sources are telling me that No Labels is more closely aligned with Republican/MAGA platforms and attempting to trick moderates to vote for more conservative candidates.

I'll also note that ghost candidates to siphon votes (FL) and elected persons switching parties after winning (NC, GA, WV, LA, NY) have many more examples from the right.
LOL! That is funny. Paraphrasing: "If we No Labels Democrats can't beat Trump on our own; we'll throw our votes to Biden."

Oh yeah! This wreaks of a Republican conspiracy. Are your sources passing out foil hats with their flyers, to lock in the freshness?
 
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,951
4,513
Colorado
✟1,130,295.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Are third and fourth parties still outlawed in the States?
Not outlawed but if they can draw a large enough percentage of votes their way will effectively only split the votes from the big two. They will likely never overtake either of the two.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,671
18,627
✟1,477,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Are third and fourth parties still outlawed in the States?
No. However every third party in the US is fixated on shooting for the top offices they have no hope of winning and ignoring the boring work of building a base and showing their ability to govern at a state or local level.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is hilarious. Every liberal I'm familiar with views No Labels as a subterfuge to assist Donald. See also - Robert Kennedy Jr's vanity run and his close ties to the Conservisphere and Donald Operatives.
1690746446790.png
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
How does the Democrat Director of No Labels fit into the "Conservisphere" (whatever that is)?
Your question makes no sense.

The Conservisphere is the term I've coined for the interconnected conservative hive mind including Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Brietbart, Daily Caller, Daily Signal, Daily Wire, PraegerU, Redstate, NY Post, Washington Times, conservative talk radio, think tanks, PACs, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustOneWay
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,357
10,783
US
✟1,583,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Your question makes no sense.

The Conservisphere is the term I've coined for the interconnected conservative hive mind including Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Brietbart, Daily Caller, Daily Signal, Daily Wire, PraegerU, Redstate, NY Post, Washington Times, conservative talk radio, think tanks, PACs, etc.
Well there is the problem. You're looking at the wrong hive. The WT only repeated what the No Labels leadership promised.
 
Upvote 0