Does the locality of physical uniqueness allow death and decay?

[pittsburghjoe]

What do you think it means that sin will not be possible in Heaven?

 

[sjastro]

To bring some science into this thread an acquaintance of mine, a physicist who operated out of the ANU (Australian National University) and an expert on radiocarbon dating testing was recruited by one of the test laboratories (I think it was at Oxford University) to aid in testing of a sample of the Shroud of Turin.

At the time of testing a blinded experiment was performed and the identity of the sample was revealed to the testers months after the experiment to avoid possible bias.

 

[pittsburghjoe]

Yeah, a piece that was singed from a fire and touched by human hands for centuries. Watch the video.

 

[sjastro]

Yeah, a piece that was singed from a fire and touched by human hands for centuries. Watch the video.

First of all it is good etiquette of using the quote function when responding to my posts.
Secondly my post was about an individuals first hand account on testing, not a commentary on the Shroud's authenticity which makes your response irrelevant.

 

[pittsburghjoe]

I'm not doubting he tested something, WATCH THE VIDEO.

 

[sjastro]

I'm not doubting he tested something, WATCH THE VIDEO.

TRY...READING....MY....POST.

 

[Hans Blaster]

What do you think it means that sin will not be possible in Heaven?

I assume your talking to me based on context though perhaps you're just talking into the ether...

Since I don't think Heaven exists and that sin is a human construct, I find this question to be non-sensical and irrelevant.

 

[pittsburghjoe]

Whoever wants to respond is fine. Sin is disorder in coherence. God wants us to entangle with him when this is over ..you can't be decoherent and do that.

 

[sjastro]

To bring some science into this thread an acquaintance of mine, a physicist who operated out of the ANU (Australian National University) and an expert on radiocarbon dating testing was recruited by one of the test laboratories (I think it was at Oxford University) to aid in testing of a sample of the Shroud of Turin.

At the time of testing a blinded experiment was performed and the identity of the sample was revealed to the testers months after the experiment to avoid possible bias.

I should also mention he raised the issue about sample integrity.
The Shroud has undergone repair work over the centuries and there was concern the sample tested was not representative of the original material.
I'm almost certain this was an original piece of information before it evolved into a fringe theory.

Studies on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin
Rogers, Raymond N.

In 1988, radiocarbon laboratories at Arizona, Cambridge, and Zurich determined the age of a sample from the Shroud of Turin. They reported that the date of the cloth's production lay between a.d. 1260 and 1390 with 95% confidence. This came as a surprise in view of the technology used to produce the cloth, its chemical composition, and the lack of vanillin in its lignin. The results prompted questions about the validity of the sample.Preliminary estimates of the kinetics constants for the loss of vanillin from lignin indicate a much older age for the cloth than the radiocarbon analyses. The radiocarbon sampling area is uniquely coated with a yellow–brown plant gum containing dye lakes. Pyrolysis-mass-spectrometry results from the sample area coupled with microscopic and microchemical observations prove that the radiocarbon sample was not part of the original cloth of the Shroud of Turin. The radiocarbon date was thus not valid for determining the true age of the shroud.

Studies on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin

 

[tampasteve]

ADMIN HAT ON

This thread is now closed permanently due to multiple violation posts.​

ADMIN HAT OFF​