Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They mark territory and scare away invaders with duet screaming from a mated pair.
If you see them at a zoo, they are actually quite cute.
The classic study is the Prairie Vole that is said to mate for life. There seems to be a hormone in some Mammals and some birds that cause them to mate for life.Does the fact of Evolution question the idea of marriage to one partner for life?
A little something to reflect upon:
'....
Some scientists view both social and sexual monogamy in humans as a societal structure rather than a natural state.
"I don't think we are a monogamous animal," said Pepper Schwartz, a professor of sociology at the University of Washington in Seattle. "A really monogamous animal is a goose – which never mates again even if its mate is killed."
She added, "Monogamy is invented for order and investment – but not necessarily because it's 'natural.'"....' ( http://www.livescience.com/32146-are-humans-meant-to-be-monogamous.html )
Nice fantasy.There are some scientists that believe that during the hunter-gather portion of human history, that there was not a lot of monogamy, as it does not appear to be something your average human acts on. And that "monogamy" like "marriage" came about with the agricultural age as a way of making sure that ownership of resources would pass down from one to another, and by bringing in monogamy (of course, females being monogamous) and codified societal relationships would guarantee your particular progeny would inherit those resources since we weren't groups of people running around killing animals and picking berries, where it would be much less important.
Creation Truth Orthodoxy, Abel, may well make that claim. But that in no way means it is true. As far as I am concerned, it has been totally debunked by modern science. The only way you could possibly make it stick is for you to debunk science. Good luck with that one.
Hi my dear! Here are some former evolutionists Scientists:
You do know it's against forum rules to spam links, right?
I looked at your link and it still looks like spam. The first name of anyone claimed to be a scientist I could read (not in Greek) is the name of someone claimed to be a physicist and also Fr. Can't figure out exactly how that has anything to do with the Theory of Evolution as evolution deals with biology, not physics.I add these not for spam but Ok, I'm sorry. I deleted. And I add only one link. We have conversation. I think that I can add one link my friend.
I looked at your link and it still looks like spam. The first name of anyone claimed to be a scientist I could read (not in Greek) is the name of someone claimed to be a physicist and also Fr. Can't figure out exactly how that has anything to do with the Theory of Evolution as evolution deals with biology, not physics.
I'm trying to find any biological research from him indicating that life is less than 10 000 years old. Can't find it anywhere.I'm not here for fight or spams my friend. Just I send you some modern former evolutionists scientists. Some of them are biologists, some physicists etc.
He is biologist:
Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson
Research Biologist, Speaker
I'm trying to find any biological research from him indicating that life is less than 10 000 years old. Can't find it anywhere.
Does the fact of Evolution question the idea of marriage to one partner for life?
A little something to reflect upon:
'....
Some scientists view both social and sexual monogamy in humans as a societal structure rather than a natural state.
"I don't think we are a monogamous animal," said Pepper Schwartz, a professor of sociology at the University of Washington in Seattle. "A really monogamous animal is a goose – which never mates again even if its mate is killed."
She added, "Monogamy is invented for order and investment – but not necessarily because it's 'natural.'"....' ( http://www.livescience.com/32146-are-humans-meant-to-be-monogamous.html )
Actually, evolution of life is a fact. It's a fact that the first forms of life were prokaryotes. Then, after that we find eukaryotes and then after that multicellular life. These are facts. All of them observable, testable and repeatable. Evolution of life is a fact."Does the fact of Evolution" There is the fundamental problem. Evolution is not a "fact". It is a fantasy. It is unobservable, untestable, unrepeatable.
Read those a long, long time ago. Creationist pseudo-science. Those people seem to be crazy. They refuse to get their ideas tested via scientific scrutiny. They just talk nonsense on creationist websites.If you want, you can see these:
EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNG WORLD – DR. RUSSEL HUMPHREY, PHYSICIST
DOES DISTANT STARLIGHT PROVE THE UNIVERSE IS OLD? – BY DR. JASON LISLE ON DECEMBER 13, 2007
WHY MOST SCIENTISTS BELIEVE THE WORLD IS OLD – BELIEFS FOSTER FURTHER BELIEFS ╰⊰ BY RUSSELL HUMPHREYS, PH. D. CREATIONIST PHYSICIST
Actually, evolution of life is a fact. It's a fact that the first forms of life were prokaryotes. Then, after that we find eukaryotes and then after that multicellular life. These are facts. All of them observable, testable and repeatable. Evolution of life is a fact.
The theory of evolution deals with how life changed. Genetic variation and natural selection. That's the theory.
The Flood was magic, was it?Show that magic floodies deposited those and that it works.
There are some scientists that believe that during the hunter-gather portion of human history, that there was not a lot of monogamy, as it does not appear to be something your average human acts on. And that "monogamy" like "marriage" came about with the agricultural age as a way of making sure that ownership of resources would pass down from one to another, and by bringing in monogamy (of course, females being monogamous) and codified societal relationships would guarantee your particular progeny would inherit those resources since we weren't groups of people running around killing animals and picking berries, where it would be much less important.
So, I take it that you can't find any evidence in the biological PhD thesis written by Dr Nathaniel T. Jeanson for a young earth? Do you even know what his PhD thesis involved?If you want, you can see these:
EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNG WORLD – DR. RUSSEL HUMPHREY, PHYSICIST
DOES DISTANT STARLIGHT PROVE THE UNIVERSE IS OLD? – BY DR. JASON LISLE ON DECEMBER 13, 2007
WHY MOST SCIENTISTS BELIEVE THE WORLD IS OLD – BELIEFS FOSTER FURTHER BELIEFS ╰⊰ BY RUSSELL HUMPHREYS, PH. D. CREATIONIST PHYSICIST
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?