Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If we are more than conquerors .. then why is the christian walk treated as if we are mere soldiers?
Stephanie, I cannot even convey well in words what a delight it is to read what you shared.I think it's easier to see if you change the question. Does the Father require Christ to be obedient? No, He doesn't.
He knows that Christ IS obedient because it is His nature to be obedient.
Does Christ have to struggle with temptation to sin? No. Because it is against His nature to sin. Temptation has no effect on Him. He already overcame sin.
Through faith in God's promise, I can access that exact same nature which is in Christ as MY OWN, and become just as obedient as Christ is, and just as immune to sin's temptation. As long as I remain in faith of God's promise.
What is being missed is that when we DO fail and give in to temptation, the resulting sinful action isn't where we failed. We failed in not staying in faith. Once we step outside faith in God's promise, temptation then has a foothold. The failure is in the lack of faith. The sinful action is merely the consequences of the real problem.
Obedience isn't something that we must add to our faith to remain saved. Obedience is the evidence that we ARE saved. Just as the apple is the evidence that the tree is an apple tree.
Stephanie, I cannot even convey well in words what a delight it is to read what you shared.
You are exactly right. I have said what you shared countless times, but to hear it from another, and for it to be spot on is amazing. May God continue to bless you with wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him.
Many blessings,
Gideon
There's certainly a lot (in fact a very lot) of truth with your statement; but there are those times when some verses are so pointed and unequivocal that they stand out on their own:NASB 1 Corinthians 15:2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain.along with...NASB 1 Timothy 4:16 Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you.
I think it's easier to see if you change the question. Does the Father require Christ to be obedient? No, He doesn't.
He knows that Christ IS obedient because it is His nature to be obedient.
Does Christ have to struggle with temptation to sin? No. Because it is against His nature to sin. Temptation has no effect on Him. He already overcame sin.
Through faith in God's promise, I can access that exact same nature which is in Christ as MY OWN, and become just as obedient as Christ is, and just as immune to sin's temptation. As long as I remain in faith of God's promise.
What is being missed is that when we DO fail and give in to temptation, the resulting sinful action isn't where we failed. We failed in not staying in faith. Once we step outside faith in God's promise, temptation then has a foothold. The failure is in the lack of faith. The sinful action is merely the consequences of the real problem.
Obedience isn't something that we must add to our faith to remain saved. Obedience is the evidence that we ARE saved. Just as the apple is the evidence that the tree is an apple tree.
If that be the case, then we are just left to fashion mud pies as we see fit with the infallible word of God. I just listed more than a half dozen places that God said the exact same thing. Why would we doubt Him?It is my belief that the analogies which Paul used to explain salvation in the first 8 chapters of Romans made a great deal of sense to his readers. The problem is that languages change over time. And add to that translations and interpretations and the originally easily understood principles get covered up in mud. Different languages require different analogies to make the principles as easily understood. I hope this one has helped.
I pray this clears things up a bit.
Blessings,
Gideon [/SIZE][/FONT]
Though this grace is available to all, it isn't embraced by all who have encountered God....
And what is the bottom line of this glorious obedience of faith? It is the glory of seeing the very nature of Christ begin to be imprinted.... no,no..... revealedin us. To our delight and amazement, we see ourselves able to obey in all things Is obedience required? Glory, no! It is assured!
Blessings,
Gideon
IF we are more than conquerors?. Is it debatable what God told us?
And why could not a soldier be a considered, a conquorer?
, Are we not called to be an overcomer of the world, the flesh and the devil?
Have we not been delivered from the power of darkness?
Are we not promised that sin shall not have dominion over us?
Has Jesus not promised that if we would continue in His words, we will walk free indeed?
Have we not been given armor and a sword and shield that promises to quench ALL the fiery arrows of the enemy?
Has our amazing God not promised us that He will not allow us to be tempted more than we can bear?
Do we not serve the God who promises to keep us from falling?
That is not just a conquorer, dear brother. That is MORE than a conquorer!
Blessings,
Gideon
It is my belief that the analogies which Paul used to explain salvation in the first 8 chapters of Romans made a great deal of sense to his readers. The problem is that languages change over time. And add to that translations and interpretations and the originally easily understood principles get covered up in mud. Different languages require different analogies to make the principles as easily understood. I hope this one has helped.
Romans actually speaks repeatedly of the obedience of faith.
My puppy is obedient. What does that make him be?
An obedient dog, who follows rules, to get a treat, or not be punished!
Gee, what a low level to live on as far as one's center of existence, and goal, that same level of a puppy!
There is a higher plane than elementalism, good puppy, bad puppy, good Christian, bad Christian.
Froggy, with the part that I have placed in bold, all I can say is that this type of thinking would be as foreign to the Scriptures as one could possibly hope to get; you could probably start a new religion.Now again, no one is saying to be disobedient, but if obedience is one's primary concern, or fixation, it is symptomatic of a law centered life, and elementalism, where punishment is paramount, and that would come in the form of condemnation, under a constant obedience training school, as per the verse below.
There is much discussion, much of it heated, as to whether obedience is needed after we are saved.
On the one side we have the thought that once saved, nothing can cause us to lose it.
On the other side the thought that we must be holy and fully obedient to stay saved or we can lose it.
Is that a fair assessment of both sides?
and then tell me .. im in a supermarket ,i'm about to buy some beers because i have always had that liberty to drink .(but avoid being drunken) and the holy Spirit speaks to my heart (he is my Sheppards voice -he only speaks that which he hears from the father ) And he says to me ..do not buy that ...
Do i go ahead and buy it ?-if so why?
Do i listen and obey ? - if so , why ?
That would probably be, you, me and quite a few others as well! Though I think that it would be more prudent to start with a home-church or maybe rent a shop front where undoubtedly there would be a few of like mind. They would probably want to wait to see how the book sells before a denomination is considered.Nope you don't then you go write a book about the experience then start a denomination that is anti-drinking beer (probably US beer) then travel about how you're life has changed because you stopped drinking beer, then pick up a habit of drinking hard alcohol under the table then start a TV ministry while owning stocks in a beer company.
Could just be me who thinks this though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?