Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because this thread poses a question, and the point of the discussion is to debate our viewpoints on it?
We've been discussing it. The point of discussion is different for each person. I don't discuss to debate, and I don't debate to take sides. I do both for education and perspective. Now, if you are done harassing me about my motivations for contributing in this thread let's keep discussing.
Show that the Bible's morals do not evolve and are not based on logic and informed by real world evidence.
Deciding that a book is the inspired word of God still leaves it open for interpretation.
Words on paper do not change over time, and since they are based on the supernatural, the edicts of the Bible are not constrained by the rules of logic or empirical evidence. There is, for example, no way to test the assertion that eating shellfish angers God.
True; everyone has their own interpretation of the Bible. Here's a question, though: is there anything that would convince you the Bible is wrong?
The interpretation of those words does change.
Non sequitor. Just because it is supernatural does not make it illogical: Only unscientific.
If you have such magical evidence I'd love to see it. As I've been discussing this for several years, I've yet to see anything that refutes the reliability of the Bible. If such evidence existed I'd recognize it, but my faith that it exists dwindles with each passing year.
Of course. But the words themselves do not.
The Bible states both that God is omniscient, and that humans have free will. These are mutually exclusive concepts; they cannot logically exist in the same universe.
If I had figured out how to not only prove a negative, but how to disprove the supernatural, you'd be more likely to see me on the talk show circuit than hanging out on a forum.
That it can be known requires that it is predestined (or deterministic, if you prefer). Omniscience and free will are as mutually exclusive as an irresistible force and an immovable object.
Who did I stereotype with that paragraph? I didn't make any presumptions about you, and I'm simply pointing out the inherent danger in holding an immutable belief. The same warnings and dangers apply to any such belief - I feel that a belief that America is inherently superior to every other country, without qualification, is just as dangerous. I chose to address the danger in religious beliefs because it was topical.
Actually, some of our more basic moral precepts show up in 'lower' animals, as well. In addition to the expected kin selection, many social animals exhibit reciprocal (tit-for-tat) altruism, along with more complex forms up to and including outright self-sacrifice. This leads to an evolutionary advantage at the species level.
