Does man have a freewill ?

bling said:

Everyone agrees that we do not have the free will to fly around the room by our own power, so we are limited in our choices. We can be extremely limited by our physical and environmental condition, but could every mature adult mentally make just one free will choice outside of these limitations and thus be a choice of his own discretion?

Click to expand...

bling said:

You define “free will” as: the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.

I would add “to act” this “or think”, since thinking can be a mental action, since we are focusing on “one’s own discretion”.

Click to expand...

Thanks for giving a definition. It's always important in a discussion, to have a clear understanding of what is under discussion.

bling said:

A slave is extremely limited to what he wills to do, with a slave of satan always acting with a selfish motive and not being able to keep from the action of sinning, although like Paul in Ro. 7 might personally desire not to sin. Even though most of the time the sinner selfishly personally desires to sin, can He/she for a moment be like Paul in Ro. 7 and not want to sin, even though they go on and sin?

You are the slave of who you are following (which is a choice), so can you just stop following satan for a moment?



Does God have the power and Love to allow mature adult humans to truly make very limited (maybe just one) autonomous free will choices to accept or reject God’s pure charity, which will enable the human to become like God himself in that the human obtains the free unconditional gift of Godly type Love (Luke 7)?

Did God granted a very limited autonomous free will choice to Adam and Eve and if so why could God not do the same for all mature adults?

God can still be autonomous by autonomously choosing to allow humans one autonomous free will choice within the Limits His choosing?

Just as the prodigal son on his own did nothing worthy of anything, yet was brought to his senses by his own actions and made the free will choice return to the Father, can we (and really will we) be brought to our senses at least once, while in our mature adult situation, to decide to be macho and stay in the pigsty of life where we deserve to be or humbly turn to the Father we have hurt and ask for just some kind of undeserving existence, out of our selfish motivation?

A mature adult sinful nonbeliever cannot “do” anything righteous, worthy, spiritual or even unselfish, but does that also mean the sinful person, in this dead state, could not humbly accept pure charity for selfish reasons?

Click to expand...

All good questions... and yes.

CoreyD said:

Hi Clare.
Can you explain 'voluntary' yo me please?

Click to expand...

"Voluntary" is used in reference to choosing what one prefers.

The context here is the Biblical notion of moral "free will."
"Free will" is a philosophical notion, not a Biblical notion, the philosophical meaning of which is the ability to make all moral choices.
The Biblical notion of personal freedom is simply the ability to voluntarily choose what one prefers.
Fallen man cannot make all moral choices, he cannot choose to never sin, therefore, he does not have philosophical "free will."
The Biblical notion of the human will is simply the power to choose what one prefers.

CoreyD said:

Also, have you defined free will as "complete free will to make all moral choices; e.g."
I don't understand freewill to be "complete free will"?

Click to expand...

Free will is not a Biblical notion, it is a philosophical notion.

CoreyD said:

Free will is not free will, by quantity.
Nor is it a case of free will being ultimate, or unlimited, as my post explained.

So, you don't seem to be tackling freewill. Right now, it seems you are tackling something greater than free will. Perhaps sovereignty, or absolute authority.
No. Man was not given either of these, as can be seen from the explanation in my post.
You aren't trying to adjust free will to not be free will, are you?

Click to expand...

I am pointing out that "free will" is not a Biblical notion, it is a philosophical notion.
The Bible presents man's "freedom" as acting voluntarily, the power to choose what he prefers.
It does not present man's freedom as the power to make all moral choices, which is what is meant by "free will,"
and which "free will" is not found in Scripture.

Hentenza said:

It was clear.

Click to expand...

Not to me it wasn't. Do you care whether or not the person you're talking to can understand what you're saying? That should matter to you. Can you please answer my question? What do you mean they (predestination and free will) are the same?

Hentenza said:

Let me ask you a question.

Click to expand...

So, you expect me to answer your question when you don't answer mine. How nice.

Hentenza said:

What is God’s mechanism to predestine?

Why does he predestine some and not others?

Click to expand...

He does not predestine certain individuals to believe, He predestines those who believe to be conformed to the image of His Son and to be "holy and blameless" (Ephesians 1:4). God does not choose for us whether we believe or not. He holds us responsible to choose. Those who do believe are predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son and to be holy and blameless.

What can't be true is that God predestines some to believe and be saved entirely by His own choice while the rest are left in unbelief and are condemned with no opportunity to be saved. God is love (1 John 4:8). God graciously offers salvation to all people (Titus 2:11), so it's not possible that the choice in salvation is entirely up to Him. He wants people to submit to Him and His Son willingly.

Clare73 said:

See posts #15, #108 and #278.

Click to expand...

I already have seen them and responded to them. This is just ridiculous that this is all you can say at this point. If you have nothing to add to what you said in those posts then you clearly have nothing to refute what I've sad. See all of my previous posts where I refuted what you said in those posts.

Clare73 said:

The issue here is not inability to understand, but inability to believe.

Click to expand...

No one has an inability to believe. If that was the case, it wouldn't be true that no one has an excuse to not glorify God as God and to be thankful to Him, but that is what Paul indicated in Romans 1:21. If all people have the ability and are expected to glorify God and be thankful to Him without any excuse for not doing so, then it makes no sense to claim that all people have that responsibility, but at the same time are somehow unable to repent and believe in Christ.

Spiritual Jew said:

I already have seen them and responded to them. This is just ridiculous that this is all you can say at this point. If you have nothing to add to what you said in those posts then you clearly have nothing to refute what I've sad. See all of my previous posts where I refuted what you said in those posts.
No one has an inability to believe. If that was the case, it wouldn't be true that no one has an excuse to not glorify God as God and to be thankful to Him, but that is what Paul indicated in Romans 1:21. If all people have the ability and are expected to glorify God and be thankful to Him without any excuse for not doing so, then it makes no sense to claim that all people have that responsibility, but at the same time are somehow unable to repent and believe in Christ.

Click to expand...

Previously addressed. . .(see post #295).

Clare73 said:

The word in the Greek there is "voluntary."
Keeping in mind that man is a slave to sin (Jn 8:34). Slaves are not free.

Unregenerate man can make some moral choices, but he cannot make all moral choices.
He cannot choose to be sinless, he is only "free" to choose what he prefers, which preference is determined by his fallen nature.

Click to expand...

According to Paul, he can choose whether or not to glorify God and be thankful to Him, but in your false doctrine he somehow can't choose to repent and believe the gospel. That makes no sense at all.

Clare73 said:

Nor can unregenerate man choose to savingly believe.

Click to expand...

Yes, he can and all people are expected to do so. Why else does God get angry at people for not believing except that He requires and expects them to do so?

Clare73 said:

Faith is a gift (Php 1:29, Ac 13:48, 18:27, 2 Pe 1:1, Ro 12:3).

Click to expand...

Not saving faith. None of those verses say that. Why do you not actually quote the text and show exactly how these verses say what you claim they say? Is that too much to expect from you? Is that too much effort for you? You just want to put in minimal effort to support your doctrine? Let's actually quote the verses and see if they teach that saving faith is a gift.

Philippians 1:29 For it has been granted to you on behalf of Christ not only to believe in him, but also to suffer for him, 30 since you are going through the same struggle you saw I had, and now hear that I still have.

This verse is not talking about being given saving faith. This is talking about being given the privilege of having the opportunity to believe in and serve Christ and to suffer for Him like Paul did. Do you claim that this says that suffering for Christ is a gift that God gives us and that it isn't our choice of whether to suffer for Him or not?

Acts 13:48 When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.

Where does this say that saving faith is a gift? Nowhere. This verse does not say that those Gentiles were appointed to believe as Calvinists falsely imagine, it says they were appointed for eternal life just as all who believe are (John 3:16).

Acts 18:27 When Apollos wanted to go to Achaia, the brothers and sisters encouraged him and wrote to the disciples there to welcome him. When he arrived, he was a great help to those who by grace had believed.

Where does this say that saving faith is a gift? Nowhere. We are saved by grace through faith. We are not just saved by grace and we are not just saved through faith (Ephesians 2:8). Without God's grace it wouldn't be possible to have the opportunity to believe unto salvation. That's all this verse is saying. In no way, shape or form is it saying that saving faith is a gift.

You also referenced 2 Peter 1:1. Did you stop reading there?

2 Peter 1:1 Simon Peter, a bondservant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who have obtained like precious faith with us by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ: 2 Grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord, 3 as His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, 4 by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. 5 But also for this very reason, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue, to virtue knowledge, 6 to knowledge self-control, to self-control perseverance, to perseverance godliness, 7 to godliness brotherly kindness, and to brotherly kindness love. 8 For if these things are yours and abound, you will be neither barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 For he who lacks these things is shortsighted, even to blindness, and has forgotten that he was cleansed from his old sins. 10 Therefore, brethren, be even more diligent to make your call and election sure, for if you do these things you will never stumble; 11 for so an entrance will be supplied to you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

If saving faith was the gift of God, as Calvinists claim,, then why would Peter make it conditional as to whether those of us with faith will grow in the faith by adding to our faith virtue, knowledge, self control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly kindness and love OR if we instead become "unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ" which can lead "even to blindness" because of forgetting that we were cleansed from our old sins? If saving faith was the gift of God then wouldn't that mean keeping our faith would be God's responsibility as well? Yet, Peter says we need to be "even more diligent to make your call and election sure" by doing the things he talked about in verse 5 so that we never stumble. That shows that it is OUR responsibility to choose to believe and OUR responsibility to be diligent in continuing to have faith by doing the things that are necessary to grow in the faith instead of becoming unfruitful which can lead to blindness and a loss of faith.

You cherry picked 2 Peter 1:1 without looking at the context of the verse. You need to look at the context of scripture.

Romans 12:3 For I say, through the grace given to me, to everyone who is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think soberly, as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith. 4 For as we have many members in one body, but all the members do not have the same function, 5 so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another. 6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, let us prophesy in proportion to our faith; 7 or ministry, let us use it in our ministering; he who teaches, in teaching; 8 he who exhorts, in exhortation; he who gives, with liberality; he who leads, with diligence; he who shows mercy, with cheerfulness.

Romans 12:3 is not talking about saving faith. The context of the verse is in relation to spiritual gifts of the Holy Spirit. Not all believers have the same spiritual gifts, but God gives each person "a measure of faith" that is needed to use whatever spiritual gift(s) that he or she has. That's why Paul said things like "if prophecy, let us prophesy in proportion to our faith". A certain measure of faith is needed in order to prophesy that isn't the same as needed to minister or exhort and so on. It differs. But, saving faith does not have different measures or amounts. Saving faith is the same for everyone. The faith you put in Christ that results in salvation is not different than mine. It's not as if you need a certain amount of faith to be saved that differs from the amount of faith I need to be saved. Of course not. So, once again, you are taking a verse out of context. Romans 12:3 has nothing to do with saving faith, but rather has to do with an extra measure of faith and supernatural ability that is needed to use our spiritual gifts.

Clare73 said:

So though he is a free agent, man does not have complete free will to make all moral choices; e.g., to be sinless.

Click to expand...

Meaningless comment. That he can't choose to be sinless has nothing to do with not being able to choose to acknowledge that he is a lost sinner and that he needs the forgiveness that only Jesus can provide.

Clare73 said:

Previously addressed. . .(see post #295).

Click to expand...

LOL. This is just comical at this point. All you can say is see post such and such where you supposedly already addressed my point even though you did not. This is a huge waste of time. You are not willing to put any effort into backing up your claims.

Clare73 said:

"Voluntary" is used in reference to choosing what one prefers.

Click to expand...

Are you saying Clare, that voluntary is not used in reference to free will or willingness?
I have here, a source that says of the Greek word hekousios - meaning free will, is the neuter of a derivative from hekon; voluntariness -- willingly, which is (an adjective, a primitive term) – properly, willing; "unforced, of one's own will, voluntary" (J. Thayer), i.e. acting on one's own accord. The root (hek-) emphasizes intentional, deliberate action (choice), i.e. "of free-will" (J. Thayer).

Are you saying I should accept your opinion over this?
Can you give me a good reason for doing so?

Willingness, or free will, even voluntary. is not simply "choosing what one prefers".
However, why that does not amount to free will, is still a puzzle to me. Perhaps you will explain.

Clare73 said:

The context here is the Biblical notion of moral "free will."
"Free will" is a philosophical notion, not a Biblical notion, the philosophical meaning of which is the ability to make all moral choices.

Click to expand...

Do you have a source for this philosophical free will, please, and does the Bible refer to free will, regarding morality, yes or no?

Clare73 said:

The Biblical notion of personal freedom is simply the ability to voluntarily choose what one prefers.

Click to expand...

Personal freedom?
Can you explain that and give me one or two examples, please?
Can you please explain why you refer to having a choice to act according to one's own will, "personal freedom", as opposed to "free will", and why you object to that being Biblical?

Clare73 said:

Fallen man cannot make all moral choices, he cannot choose to never sin, therefore, he does not have philosophical "free will."
The Biblical notion of the human will is simply the power to choose what one prefers.

Click to expand...

Oh. I see.
Thanks for explaining.
So, man does not have free will, because "he cannot choose to never sin".
Without thinking of the philosophical world view, can you think of any scripture that says man can have a will, and has the freedom to exercise that will?
Or do you believe that man can never exercise his will?

Clare73 said:

Free will is not a Biblical notion, it is a philosophical notion.

Click to expand...

Okay. Yes, I heard that, but many who study the Bible disagree.
So, before we have any further discussion on if man has free will, we need to establish if the Bible refers to free will apart from the philosophical worldview.
If not, we would wind up talking about two different things... like "theory" and "theory (scientific)"

So, can you prove that millions of students of the Bible are wrong that the Bible refers to free will, and that you are right, and the Bible does not refer to free will?

Clare73 said:

I am pointing out that "free will" is not a Biblical notion, it is a philosophical notion.
The Bible presents man's "freedom" as acting voluntarily, the power to choose what he prefers.
It does not present man's freedom as the power to make all moral choices, which is what is meant by "free will,"
and which "free will" is not found in Scripture.

Click to expand...

Okay. Thank you.
I understand you, and appreciate your clear explanation.
I await your proof that you are correct, and all the others are incorrect.

Brightfame52 said:

Im giving you bible and you giving me human philosophy

Click to expand...

Some people just have self proclaimed "truths", and the best they can do is repeat that they are in the right.
I don't have a disclaimer, but I've adopted @Rose_bud's own.
I don't think she'd mind.
See yah.

Spiritual Jew said:

LOL. This is just comical at this point. All you can say is see post such and such where you supposedly already addressed my point even though you did not. This is a huge waste of time. You are not willing to put any effort into backing up your claims.

Click to expand...

Seems to go on a lot on RF. It must be the spirit of the air.
I think I need to go read all the comments. That will occupy my time, until I hear from someone actually willing to have a discussion.
So far, Clare has given me an explanation, and I appreciate that.

Clare73 said:

Well, we can start with Jesus who said man is a slave to sin (Jn 8:34). . .slaves are not free.

Man's will is not free to make all moral choices. . .he cannot choose to be sinless.
Man's will is free to choose what he prefers. . . which in unregenerate man is self over submission to God.

Click to expand...

Interesting Clare.
Just recently, you were having a discussion on keeping the law, and you did refer to what Paul said, so what are your thoughts on Romans 7:25

CoreyD said:

Are you saying Clare, that voluntary is not used in reference to free will or willingness?

Click to expand...

1) Free will is a philosophical notion, not a Biblical notion, which means that man has the power to make all moral choices.
But Scripture does not present the "free will" of man, it presents the slavery to sin of man (Jn 8:34). Slaves to sin are not completely morally free.
They cannot choose to be sinless, therefore, they are not completely morally free.

The Biblical notion of "freedom" is "voluntary;" i.e., man has the power to choose what he prefers, not the power to choose anything (sinlessness).

2) "Voluntary" does not imply (the philosophical notion of) complete freedom; i.e., ability to make all moral choices.
"Voluntary" simply means that man has the moral power to choose what he prefers.
Fallen man does not have the freedom to make all moral choices, he cannot choose to be sinless, because he is a slave to sin (Jn 8:34).
Therefore, his will is not completely free. . .his moral choices are limited.
He has freedom, but it is limited, not complete. He can choose what he prefers, but he cannot choose to be sinless.

CoreyD said:

I have here, a source that says of the Greek word hekousios - meaning free will, is the neuter of a derivative from hekon; voluntariness -- willingly, which is (an adjective, a primitive term) – properly, willing; "unforced, of one's own will, voluntary" (J. Thayer), i.e. acting on one's own accord. The root (hek-) emphasizes intentional, deliberate action (choice), i.e. "of free-will" (J. Thayer).

Are you saying I should accept your opinion over this?
Can you give me a good reason for doing so?

Click to expand...

There is no conflict.
That definition does not involve the extent of voluntariness (which does not extend to sinlessness).

CoreyD said:

Willingness, or free will, even voluntary. is not simply "choosing what one prefers".
However, why that does not amount to free will, is still a puzzle to me. Perhaps you will explain.

Click to expand...

Because free will is a human notion (Pelagius), and its definition is the ability to make all moral choices.
The NT denies this ability, one cannot choose to be sinless.

CoreyD said:

Do you have a source for this philosophical free will, please,

Click to expand...

It does back to Aristotle and Cicero, but we have Pelagius, a British monk around 400 AD, to thank for it in the church.

CoreyD said:

and does the Bible refer to free will, regarding morality, yes or no?

Click to expand...

"Free will" is not in the Bible.

CoreyD said:

Personal freedom?
Can you explain that and give me one or two examples, please?

Click to expand...

Personal "freedom" is simply the power to act voluntarily, which does not include the power to choose to be sinless.
We don't have that power, our "personal freedom" is limited.

CoreyD said:

Can you please explain why you refer to having a choice to act according to one's own will, "personal freedom", as opposed to "free will", and why you object to that being Biblical?

Click to expand...

Philosophical free will is the power to make all moral choices.
Man does not have that power, he cannot choose to be sinless.

Personal freedom is simply the ability to act voluntarily, but not necessarily to make all moral choices; e.g., sinlessness.

CoreyD said:

Oh. I see.
Thanks for explaining.
So, man does not have free will, because "he cannot choose to never sin".
Without thinking of the philosophical world view, can you think of any scripture that says man can have a will, and has the freedom to exercise that will?
Or do you believe that man can never exercise his will?

Click to expand...

"Free will" is not in the Bible.
Choosing "voluntarily" is in the Bible, which presents limitations to man's power to choose voluntarily; e.g., to be sinless.

CoreyD said:

Okay. Yes, I heard that, but many who study the Bible disagree.
So, before we have any further discussion on if man has free will, we need to establish if the Bible refers to free will apart from the philosophical worldview.
If not, we would wind up talking about two different things... like "theory" and "theory (scientific)"

So, can you prove that millions of students of the Bible are wrong that the Bible refers to free will, and that you are right, and the Bible does not refer to free will?

Click to expand...

Present the verse which states "free will" of man, there is none.

CoreyD said:

Okay. Thank you.
I understand you, and appreciate your clear explanation.
I await your proof that you are correct, and all the others are incorrect.

Click to expand...

Spiritual Jew said:

He does not predestine certain individuals to believe, He predestines those who believe to be conformed to the image of His Son and to be "holy and blameless" (Ephesians 1:4). God does not choose for us whether we believe or not. He holds us responsible to choose. Those who do believe are predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son and to be holy and blameless.

Click to expand...

Based on His foreknowledge.

Spiritual Jew said:

What can't be true is that God predestines some to believe and be saved entirely by His own choice while the rest are left in unbelief and are condemned with no opportunity to be saved. God is love (1 John 4:8). God graciously offers salvation to all people (Titus 2:11), so it's not possible that the choice in salvation is entirely up to Him. He wants people to submit to Him and His Son willingly.

Click to expand...

Here is where the rubber meets the road. If what you describe above and conclude below work in unison then how do you account for Romans 9:22-24?

Hentenza said:

Based on His foreknowledge.

Click to expand...

Let me also point out that prognosis is used only of God's foreknowledge, who knows in advance what is going to happen because he has decreed that it shall happen.

Hentenza said:

Here is where the rubber meets the road. If what you describe above and conclude below work in unison then how do you account for Romans 9:22-24?

Click to expand...

Clare73 said:

Let me also point out that prognosis is used only of God's foreknowledge, who knows in advance what is going to happen because he has decreed that it shall happen.

Click to expand...

If God knows what is going to happen because He decreed it, doesn't that mean God's foreknowledge is based on His action rather than His being (unless God is His decree)?

zoidar said:

If God knows what is going to happen because He decreed it, doesn't that mean God's foreknowledge is based on His action rather than His being (unless God is His decree)?

Click to expand...

Where does his action come from, if not his being?

Clare73 said:

Where does his action come from, if not his being?

Click to expand...

Then it seems to me God isn't all knowing in Himself, but God has all knowledge through His action.

Clare73 said:

1) Free will is a philosophical notion, not a Biblical notion, which means that man has the power to make all moral choices.
But Scripture does not present the "free will" of man, it presents the slavery to sin of man (Jn 8:34). Slaves to sin are not completely morally free.
They cannot choose to be sinless, therefore, they are not completely morally free.

Click to expand...

I cannot choose to be black or white, but that doesn't mean I can't choose.
You are incorrectly defining free will... in the Bible.

Clare73 said:

The Biblical notion of "freedom" is "voluntary;" i.e., man has the power to choose what he prefers, not the power to choose anything (sinlessness).

Click to expand...

That is not relevant to free will... in the Bible.

Clare73 said:

2) "Voluntary" does not imply (the philosophical notion of) complete freedom; i.e., ability to make all moral choices.
"Voluntary" simply means that man has the moral power to choose what he prefers.
Fallen man does not have the freedom to make all moral choices, he cannot choose to be sinless, because he is a slave to sin (Jn 8:34).
Therefore, his will is not completely free. . .his moral choices are limited.
He has freedom, but it is limited, not complete. He can choose what he prefers, but he cannot choose to be sinless.

Click to expand...

This reminds me of the man that said aliens abducted him and gave him knowledge he can't share.
When asked to prove it, he said, "I said it, so there."
All you have done Clare, is said, I'm right, so there.
You have not been given the authority to decide what's in the Bible. You're not God, Clare.

Free will is not about overcoming one's 'nature'.
Free will is about being given the gift to freely make decisions based one's desires... regardless of sin.
Adam was sinless, wasn't he? Was he given free will... yes or no?
Sin does not render one incapable of having the freedom to make decisions regarding one's will.

At Deuteronomy 30:19, God said, "I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing. Therefore choose life, so that you and your descendants may live,"
It's not possible to choose life, if one did not have free will.
So, you are making God's word void, aren't you?

Clare73 said:

There is no conflict.
That definition does not involve the extent of voluntariness (which does not extend to sinlessness).

Because free will is a human notion (Pelagius), and its definition is the ability to make all moral choices.

Click to expand...

No, Clare.
The Bible does not support that philosophical concept.

Clare73 said:

The NT denies this ability, one cannot choose to be sinless.

Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with free will in the Bible.

Clare73 said:

It does back to Aristotle and Cicero, but we have Pelagius, a British monk around 400 AD, to thank for it in the church.

Click to expand...

No source?
Okay. Then we have your opinion and your claim, alone.

Clare73 said:

"Free will" is not in the Bible.

Click to expand...

Repeated claim, but that is your word against the Bible's.
I go with the Bible. If you prefer your claim, that's your free willed choice.

Clare73 said:

Personal "freedom" is simply the power to act voluntarily, which does not include the power to choose to be sinless.
We don't have that power, our "personal freedom" is limited.

Click to expand...

Did you make that up, because it sounds like you coined the term, and gave it a definition, because personal freedom is subjective to 8,000,000,000 people.
To some, personal freedom is not having to get up in the morning to go to work.
Personal freedom refers to the ability of individuals to make choices and decisions about their lives without undue interference from external forces, such as government or societal norms.

However, let's work with your definition.
You said,

Personal "freedom" is simply the power to act voluntarily, which does not include the power to choose to be sinless.
We don't have that power, our "personal freedom" is limited.

Click to expand...

Free will is the ability to act according to one's will, desires... and does not include the power to choose to be sinless.
We don't have that power, our free will is limited. For example, free will cannot change our skin color, nor make us immune to sicknesses, since free will is not a physical 'asset'.

What argument do you have against free will, because it's no different to what you call "personal freedom"?

Clare73 said:

Philosophical free will is the power to make all moral choices.
Man does not have that power, he cannot choose to be sinless.

Click to expand...

Let's forget about Philosophical free will.
I'm not discussing that.
I'm talking about God given free will.
If you aren't talking about that, then it's like you talking to me about theory (scientific), when I am talking about theory (general).
If we aren't talking about the same thing, the conversation is meaningless. It's actually not conversing.

Clare73 said:

Personal freedom is simply the ability to act voluntarily, but not necessarily to make all moral choices; e.g., sinlessness.

"Free will" is not in the Bible.

Click to expand...

It is in the Bible, and I showed two scriptures.
However, you claimed that you know better than those who understand Greek, and therefore they need to remove the word they used - hekousios: free will.
On what basis, Clare... because Clare said it?

Clare73 said:

Choosing "voluntarily" is in the Bible, which presents limitations to man's power to choose voluntarily; e.g., to be sinless.

Click to expand...

I must use your Bible then, because of the 43 translations on this page, only 10 use the word voluntary.
All the others use "free will"; "willing"; "of your own accord"; "willingly"...
Are you saying I should scrap these, and take up the one you prefer?

Clare73 said:

Present the verse which states "free will" of man, there is none.

Click to expand...

I did Clair.
You called it into question with your expertise Greek knowledge.
What more would you like me to do?
Asking me to satisfy a self proclaimed expert that provides no proof of their claim of being the right one is no different to to asking me to break a wall with my head, and I can't do that.

You have not provided any proof of your claim, but yet, you are right... to you.