No.But do you agree that if the proposition is not true that "An Intelligent Being created the universe with Intention" then all that we see around us (the whole universe) came to be or appear by pure random chance?
No.Even if you do not know the probability of such a thing do you see that this is the only alternative in general?
St. Thomas sure did not commit this fallacy, but you did.Show me where St. Thomas committed this fallacy in his 5 proofs of God's existence.
Doesn't matter who made the argument if the argument is wrong.Aristotle was not a Christian and he reasoned that there must be a Prime Mover. This would be the unmoved Mover.
That's not appeal to ignorance. It's acceptance of the fact that the burden of proof lies on the one who makes a positive claim.Here you are committing the fallacy of appeal to ignorance.
Upvote
0