- Aug 29, 2004
- 2,267
- 105
- 39
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I believe the Bible should be taken literally and so if God said to do something, then He means it! PERIOD!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
jdw4jesus said:I believe the Bible should be taken literally and so if God said to do something, then He means it! PERIOD!
So when do we start stoning adulterers again?jdw4jesus said:I believe the Bible should be taken literally and so if God said to do something, then He means it! PERIOD!
I try to catch myself, and just say yes or no, instead of I swear to God, or other varients. It is a hard habit to break, that is for surelambslove said:How do you understand this, and do you pledge, swear or take an oath.
lambslove said:How do you understand this, and do you pledge, swear or take an oath.
BT said:During the jury selection, when a juror was selected by the two lawyers the court officer asked the juror, "Do you want to swear on the Bible, or just affirm?" (btw I'm really getting to be sick to my stomach of the Canadian Gov'ts liberalism... I mean seriously sick).
Wikipedia - Oath
...
Legal reforms from the eighteenth century onwards mean that everyone in the United Kingdom now has the right to make an affirmation instead of an oath. The United States has permitted affirmations since it was founded; they are even mentioned in the Constitution.
Gold Dragon said:Is allowing an option to affirm what you consider to be an example of the Canadian gov'ts liberalism that makes you sick? This has been situation in the US since its founding and is also the case in the UK since the 18th century. I'm still researching when it was available in Canada and will post what I find.
BT said:Oh, well if it's ok in the US and in the UK then it must be ok everywhere. My mistake.
Canada Evidence Act of 1985
...
14. (1) A person may, instead of taking an oath, make the following solemn affirmation:
I solemnly affirm that the evidence to be given by me shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
(2) Where a person makes a solemn affirmation in accordance with subsection (1), his evidence shall be taken and have the same effect as if taken under oath.
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 14; 1994, c. 44, s. 87.
eldermike said:What this verse means: Do not let an oath speak for you. It has nothing to do with swearing an oath. It's says let your words be the judge of you, not your associations. The same is true for all of your Christian witness. Membership to a church does not make you a Christian. Same thing.
Gold Dragon said:In Canada, the earliest instance I could find was 1985 but I suspect it has been around for longer.
Wikipedia - Constitution of Canada
...
Generally speaking, all British legislation that predates or modifies the British North America Act comprise the Constitution of Canada.
...
Uncle Bud said:Sorry GD when we think of you the word "stupid" doesn't eneter into the picture![]()