Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Creationists do depend on faith. Case in point, the Statement of Faith of AiG, which says the following:
The fossil record is broken and inconclusive at best. Even other scientists have admitted that, apart from any particular agenda.
But you do believe absurdities like that evolution entails that human beings can "evolve" into daffodils.We're not the ones who believe man shares a common ancestor with a daffodil.
Nonsense. It's neither broken nor inconclusive. It's incomplete (as in, we haven't found everything), which is unsurprising when you consider we are looking for animal remains from a 500 million year period in rocks on a constantly-changing Earth.The fossil record is broken and inconclusive at best. Even other scientists have admitted that, apart from any particular agenda.
Can you find a single reputable scientific organisation or journal that has a "statement of faith" similar to that of AiG?Of course they do, I wasn't saying they don't. I was saying scientists do as well.
Where is the new genetic information that is REQUIRED for evolution to be viable?
It's not merely a matter of believing. We know that humans are apes. We can show that to be true.
We're not the ones who believe man shares a common ancestor with a daffodil.
If a dog can't evolve into anything else then evolution can't happen.
Evolution not only demands increasing complexity, but it must be so common that it's the driving force of all living things.
If nothing CAN evolve into anything else then nothing DID evolve into anything else.
Can you find a single reputable scientific organisation or journal that has a "statement of faith" similar to that of AiG?
So unless we show that something is absolutely certain, science has no value?You can demonstrate a scientific theory and various hypotheses. You cannot prove it as absolute, indisputable fact.
You can demonstrate a scientific theory and various hypotheses. You cannot prove it as absolute, indisputable fact.
I KNOW that if evolution isn't happening that it never happened.But you do believe absurdities like that evolution entails that human beings can "evolve" into daffodils.
No there are not. There are very few, and many aren't even biologists.Well, there are many scientists who are creationists as well.
Consider it a challenge then. I challenge you to find a single reputable scientific organisation or journal that has a similar "statement of faith" to that of AiG.If I searched for something, I'm sure I could find it.
Well, there are many scientists who are creationists as well.
If I searched for something, I'm sure I could find it. Not all scientists are Atheists after all.
You can demonstrate a scientific theory and various hypotheses. You cannot prove it as absolute, indisputable fact.
I KNOW that if evolution isn't happening that it never happened.
YOU are the one that believes we share an ancestor; that something evolved into both daffodils and human beings.
Frankly, I think the ToE is the most pathetically idiotic claim man has ever made; believed only because the only other alternative is acknowledging God and a consequence to our actions.
Sorry KW, you'll have to do better than that. I suggest that you start by correcting your misconceptions regarding evolution.I KNOW that if evolution isn't happening that it never happened.
YOU are the one that believes we share an ancestor; that something evolved into both daffodils and human beings.
Frankly, I think the ToE is the most pathetically idiotic claim man has ever made; believed only because the only other alternative is acknowledging God and a consequence to our actions.
Have you ever heard of mutations advancing a species?Have you heard of mutations?
Which is why nobody does that (If some do, they're wrong. People are fallible, after all).
Of course they do, I wasn't saying they don't. I was saying scientists do as well.
No they're not, not by scientists.Scientific theories are proclaimed as indisputable fact all the time, that is until they are disproved by the newest and latest discovery.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?