• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do you accept evolution as a valid scientific theory?

Do accept evolution as a valid scientific theory?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Doesn't matter/neutral/I am in the mist of research

  • Four is my favorite number


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,917
1,530
20
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟70,235.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
fwiwwl said:
It seems the evidence is in! Either re-write the theory to something more verifiable or give it up. How many years has it been a theory!?:scratch:

Er.

You do know, don't you, that "theory" is what we call a working model that's doing well? Gravity is a "theory". So is Newtonian mechanics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: higgs2
Upvote 0

Dragons87

The regal Oriental kind; not evil princess-napper
Nov 13, 2005
3,532
175
London, UK
✟4,572.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I actually wouldn't call Evolution-as-the-theory-that-explains-the-beginning-and-development-of-life as science.

Neither would I do it for Creation. Heck, Creation isn't even religion!

Neither is science. What are they? They are different interpretations of a historical event.
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
To the question of the thread...


I'm VIOLATING one of my self-imposed rules NOT to discuss science at a Christian website and not to discuss theology at a science website. But, I'll slap my hand and BRIEFLY made one point (as a Christian who is a Physics major)...


Many misunderstand "theory." To be brief and to way oversimplify, a "theory" is an explaination that appears to work. It explains what is observed and adequately predicts what is discovered. Whether it is "true" or not is a question we scientists leave to the long-haired, sandal-wearing, bearded guys over in the Philosophy Department. Science is INTENSIVE pragmatic; if it works good enough, we're as happy as can be. BUT, that does not suggest that it's just one model as good as any other! It's a model that works, it "fits" what is currently observed. Theories can attain a status almost like doctrine - a status where it's not seriously questioned anymore, it's called a "law." Probably evolution has attained that status. But laws are not assumed to be FACT or TRUE in some absolute or philosophical sense, they just work so well that we aren't spending much focus on examining them anymore. Examples of this include gravity (actually, there are several theories of gravity - none proven), electromagnetism, etc. Laws CAN be discovered to be wrong (poor, poor Newton!).


Although evolution belongs to a branch of science I know nearly NOTHING about and so should keep my ignorant mouth shut, it does seem that it IS a theory of biology. Any other conclusion seems odd to me; it IS a theory of that branch of science. Whether it's TRUE or not is a question I don't think any biologist are even asking - at least in the abstract, philosophical sense in which Christians tend to mean it.

No offense meant...

Peace be with you!

- Josiah


.
 
Upvote 0

InnerPhyre

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2003
14,573
1,470
✟86,967.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
tommiegrant said:
The problem with that is the evolution is not working well when all the evidence is really considered the whole thing does not even make a good hypothis. Tom


How does it not work? Animals with certain traits reproduce...the traits that help the animal survive are passed on....those with traits that hinder the animal's survival cause that animal to die and fewer animals with those traits survive to pass on their genes...rinse...repeat....add some genetic variation...the species begins to change over the millenia. Hard to explain environmental adaptation without it...unless you contend that the world was created as-is a few thousand years ago, and if that is what you propose, then we need not talk about what is a valid scientific theory and what is not, because a 6000 year old earth has been disproven time and time again.
 
Upvote 0

graysparrow

My life is for the kids who have it rough
Feb 6, 2005
3,853
262
54
Canary Islands
✟20,269.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Yes I accept it as a valid scientific theory, the problem is where is God in all this? and more decisive...

Scientific Theories are always changing... how can I put my faith in that? Do I need a new theological theory every time a scientist discovers something new?
 
Upvote 0

DaveS

Veteran
Jul 23, 2005
1,411
54
35
Swansea, Wales
✟24,486.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
I chose Doesn't matter myself.

However, I myself am a theistic evolutionist/old earth creationist as I simply believe it to be the most likely at the moment although changing my stance isn't really a 'big' enough thing for me to say I care. All I need to know is that God did it some way that we ultimately will never agree on.

However, the guinness devolution advert is a good enough reason for me to know that God had a hand in it:

http://www.whizzvidshosting.com/noitulove/BWread.html
(does it work for you?)

Dave
 
Upvote 0

DaveS

Veteran
Jul 23, 2005
1,411
54
35
Swansea, Wales
✟24,486.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Yes I accept it as a valid scientific theory, the problem is where is God in all this? and more decisive...

Scientific Theories are always changing... how can I put my faith in that? Do I need a new theological theory every time a scientist discovers something new?

Well.. actually I read an interesting article the other day (will try to find - obscure website) which actually suggests that science is (finally) finding God and that all recent discoveries do actually point towards God. It was very interesting.

Take the origins of the universe, quantum theory, evolution, the beginnings of life, maths etc. etc. and it all points to one thing... GOD!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.