Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Umm....which evidence is that then? More proof of people being deceived by creationist lies methinks.Gwenfur said:Not to mention the only proof the evolutionists seem to present to the public and our children has been proven wrong no less than 50 years ago...
gill slits in the human fetusNumenor said:Umm....which evidence is that then? More proof of people being deceived by creationist lies methinks.
Gwenyfur said:oh....the geologic column that exists nowhere but in textbooks...
Gwenyfur said:These are just the ones in my 2nd grade daughter's class textbook *this* year.
Considering I visit ND quite often, Yes....I'd take a look at it...dig through it and certainly not date it by the fossils in itnotto said:If you were shown that the entire geologic column exists in North Dakota would you question your sources and reconsider the information that they give you?
Tell you what, I'll have her bring it home from school tonight bring it to work with me and type all the info you want out of it...just for younotto said:What's the name of the book? Who publishes it?
Gwenyfur said:Tell you what, I'll have her bring it home from school tonight bring it to work with me and type all the info you want out of it...just for youhow's that?
Gwenyfur said:Considering I visit ND quite often, Yes....I'd take a look at it...dig through it and certainly not date it by the fossils in it
ironic they're estimating the dating of the strata on estimations of the few fossils that were there and located elsewhere in the USA...I'll keep reading...but reread the italics under the article for yourself....notto said:http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/geocolumn
Here you go. No problem with the dating by the fossils since that has nothing to do with determining the geologic column.
The claim that it only exists in textbooks is what is being examined here. That is simply not the case.
Gwenyfur said:ironic they're estimating the dating of the strata on estimations of the few fossils that were there and located elsewhere in the USA...I'll keep reading...but reread the italics under the article for yourself....
circular logic at it again...
OKay I will post it this evening when I get back to work...I'm going home in less than 10 minutes...not enough time to make an answer readable...let alone understandable...notto said:I must have missed that part. Perhaps you could copy and paste the part you think is circular logic or ironic or where they discuss dating of the strata
The geologic column is determined by materials in the sediment and deposits. The article outlines where each of these layers is found in North Dakota.
This should cause you to question your sources but I doubt it will. Your sources want to misinform you and when new evidence like this comes to light, they will do nothing to inform you of it and will continue to make their claims even if they are untrue.
You need to read the article more carefully. It clearly shows that the claim that the column only exists in text books is false. It exists in North Dakota.
Do you disagree? Why? What specific information leads you to believe that the entire column does not exist in North Dakota? What part is missing? Please be specific.
notto said:The geologic column is determined by materials in the sediment and deposits. The article outlines where each of these layers is found in North Dakota.
Lion of God said:The proof ultimately is in the witness of the Spirit.
And that gets us nowhere, for when there is a difference of opinion among Christians, who can say which are hearing correctly the witness of the Spirit?
coolstylinstud said:By reading the bible
We've all done that...that's how we all got the differences of opinion in the first place.
And that gets us nowhere, for when there is a difference of opinion among Christians, who can say which are hearing correctly the witness of the Spirit?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?