You don't have to have said it explicitly. It is the context of what you are saying. We don't have to do anything, just believe. But that is not what Scripture says.
I shared the difference with you between mere "mental assent" belief (
James 2:19) and saving belief in Christ (
Acts 16:31)
which the latter also includes trust and reliance in Jesus Christ for salvation. Scripture makes it clear that salvation is a free gift received through faith (apart from works) and that is not hard to understand. (
Romans 4:5-6;
6:23;
Ephesians 2:8,
9) It's just hard for you to accept. You want to DO something to help save yourself instead of trusting exclusively in what Jesus has already DONE to save you. You trust in works (at least in part) to save you. I trust in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. That is the huge difference between us.
The difference is that the demons do not take action on that belief. They refuse (or are incapable of) to submit to God's authority.
That is because their trust and reliance is in Satan (and not in Jesus) as demonstrated by their rebellion in heaven and continuous evil works. You seem to believe that ALL belief/faith is the same "except for the lack of works" and cannot seem to grasp a
deeper faith that
trusts exclusively in Jesus Christ for salvation. This also explains why you have so much faith in "water and works."
We, on the other hand, are capable and are called to submit to His authority and commands. He says that salvation is received when we are baptized in water (
1 Pet 3:21,
Rom 6:1-7).
That's not what Jesus said in (
John 3:15,
16,
18;
5:24;
6:29,
40,
47;
11:25,
26). In regard to
1 Peter 3:21 and
Romans 6:1-7, your eisegesis does not negate those passages of Scripture in the book of John. You need to learn how to properly harmonize Scripture with Scripture.
I already thoroughly covered
1 Peter 3:21 and
Romans 6:1-7 with you and refuted your arguments in post #357.
When one stands God on Judgment Day, will God ask, "Were you baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit?" Will you be confident when replying, "Lord, I did not get baptized because I was not sure how to do it correctly and if it mattered for salvation." this just...
www.christianforums.com
It is in the action of being baptized that our sins are removed (
Acts 22:16), just as it was in the action of dipping the seventh time that Naaman's leprosy was removed.
False and Naaman's leprosy was not about sins being removed so your argument is moot. In
Acts 10:43, receiving remission of sins is connected with
"believes in Him" and not with baptism. (
Acts 10:43-47) In Acts 9, Jesus told Ananias that Paul "is a chosen vessel unto Me" (vs 15), although the apostle had not yet been water baptized. Before Paul was baptized, Christ had already commissioned him to "bear His name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel" (
Acts 9:15) and such a commission is not for one who is still lost in their sins. Before Paul’s baptism, Christ had set him aside as one who would "suffer for His name’s sake" (9:16). Can one who is a child of the devil, as all the lost are (
Ephesians 2:1-3,
John 8:44), really suffer for Christ’s sake? NO.
So, Paul had already believed in Christ when Ananias came to pray for him to receive his sight (
Acts 9:17). It also should be noted that Paul at the time when Ananias prayed for him to receive his sight, he was
filled with the Holy Spirit (
Acts 9:17)--this was
BEFORE he was water baptized. (
Acts 9:18) Verse 17 connects his being filled with the Spirit with the receiving of his sight. We know that he received his sight prior to his baptism.
*Excellent article on
Acts 22:16 -
WHAT IS TRUTH: Acts 22:16--Baptism Essential for Salvation?
Acts 22:16 does not establish baptismal regeneration. The verse itself demonstrates that the “washing away” of sins in baptism mentioned is representative and figurative, not literal. *It's interesting that when Paul recounted this event again later in Acts (
Acts 26:12-18), he did not mention Ananias or what Ananias said to him at all. Verse 18 again would confirm the idea that Paul received Christ as Savior on the road to Damascus since here Christ is telling Paul he will be a messenger for Him concerning forgiveness of sins for Gentiles as they have faith in Him. It would seem unlikely that Christ would commission Paul if Paul had not yet believed in Him and was still lost in his sins.
And in the action of marching around the city the seventh time on the seventh day that the walls of Jericho fell down (not by the power of the marching feet, or the sound of the trumpet, but by the power of God when the people obeyed what He said.
Again, the walls fell down based on their obedience, but no sins were remitted there either.
That is not what Scripture says.
That is exactly what Scriptures says.
James 2:18 - But someone will say, "You have faith, and I have works." Show me your faith without your works, and I will
show you my faith by my works. SHOW, not establish. Big difference!
Rom 10:9-10 is explicit that the physical action of confessing Jesus with the mouth (verbal and public confession (claiming) of Jesus as Lord) RESULTS IN (meaning it must come before) salvation being received.
By your misinterpretation of
Romans 10:9,
10 you erroneously turn confession into a work for salvation. Stop leaving out verse 8. Confessing with our mouth that Jesus is Lord and believing in our heart that God raised Him from the dead are not two separate steps to salvation but are chronologically together. (
Romans 10:8-10)
Confess/believe, believe/confess. Repentance
"precedes" believe/faith and water baptism
"follows" salvation through belief/faith. (
Acts 10:43-47)
This means that this action of faith (along with repentance and baptism) are actions of faith that must be produced before salvation is received.
False. (
Acts 10:43-47;
11:17,
18;
15:7-9) It would appear that you turn repentance, confession and baptism into salvation by works. What a mess! Your bad theology here is the result of bad semantics and flawed hermeneutics.
Already dealt with this false comparison. It was God's breathing the soul into man that gave man life (
Gen 2:7).
"Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living person."
James is not addressing the source of life in faith but the evidence of faith throughout
James 2:14-26. Once again, In
James 2:26, the comparison of the human spirit and faith converge around their modes of operation. The spirit (Greek pneuma) may also be translated "breath." As a breathless body
exhibits no indication of life, so fruitless faith
exhibits no indication of life. The source of the life in faith is not works; rather, life in faith is the source of works. (
Ephesians 2:5-10)
James is discussing the
evidence of faith (
says-claims to have faith but has no works/I will show you my faith by my works -
James 2:14-18) and
not the initial act of being accounted as righteous with God. (
Romans 4:2-3) This remains your Achilles heel.
Precisely. And one who claims to have faith but does not obey the one in whom he claims to have faith is lying. Would the walls of Jericho have fallen down if the people had just believed, but not marched around the city? No, obedience to the command that God says LEADS TO/RESULTS IN receiving His blessing must be done in order to receive His blessing.
James covers this in
James 2:14-26. Don't confuse obedience unto salvation (the obedient act of choosing to believe the gospel) with obedience/works which follows after salvation.
This is a nice dodge, but it is still wrong. A person is initially accounted as righteous by God when that person demonstrates their faith through obedience to what God says LEADS TO/RESULTS IN receiving His blessing.
No dodge just solid Biblical truth that is worth repeating. In
James 2:24, James is not using the word "justified" here to mean "accounted as righteous" but is
shown to be righteous. James is discussing the
evidence of faith (
says-claims to have faith but has no works/I will show you my faith by my works -
James 2:14-18) and
not the initial act of being accounted as righteous with God. (
Romans 4:2-3)
This is a faulty conclusion based on bad logic and poor understanding of the Scriptures.
Oh, the irony.
The ONLY proper conclusion when properly harmonizing Scripture with Scripture is that our obedience to God's command is still necessary today, just as it was in the OT.
Misguided obedience that culminates in salvation by works is not obedience to God's commands.
What does that "trust and reliance" look like?
It looks like we are trusting and relying in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation with no supplements needed.
It looks like baptism in water, trusting God to keep His word and remove our sins in baptism just as He said He would.
That is your eisegesis. Whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins. (
Acts 10:43) Your faith is in water baptism and is not in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. A symbol is not the reality but is a picture of the reality.
You are adding nothing new to this discussion. If all you are going to do is rehash the same old arguments that have been debunked already and simply reference posts from the past that have already been shown to be full of error, then there is no need to continue.
Oh, the irony

. Don't forget that I at one time had temporarily attended the church of Christ so I understand their absolute obsession with water baptism and how they try to "shoehorn" works "into" salvation through faith, not works. None of your arguments are anything new or enlightening.
Your heart is still hard and unwilling to come to understand the truth. I pray that God will open your heart before it is too late for the ones you teach.
I came to understand the truth when I opened my heart to the Lord several years ago when I received Jesus Christ through faith. Praise God!

I just hope and pray that something I shared with you has at least planted a seed that one day will be watered and lead you to the truth.
