• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do these books line up with Orthodoxy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mary of Bethany

Only one thing is needful.
Site Supporter
Jul 8, 2004
7,541
1,081
✟364,556.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Generally, we see Lewis as being very Orthodox in his writings, but not in every detail. My own Priest has stated many times that he thinks Lewis would have become Orthodox had he lived longer.

I personally love "The Great Divorce". "Mere Christianity" is also excellent, except that he doesn't see the Church exactly as we do.

I read Foster's "Disciplines" many years ago, when I was still Protestant, and it was good, but it probably wouldn't be considered Orthodox, since we would say that all disciplines must be grounded in Orthodox theology. I don't remember enough about it to say much.

Mary
 
Upvote 0

Gnisios

Active Member
Feb 28, 2006
269
15
✟22,974.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
David65 said:
I am wondering to what extent the teachings in a couple books are orthodox or hetrodox. Specifics would be helpful.

C.S. Lewis:
* Mere Christianity
* Miracles
* The Problem of Pain
* The Great Divorce

Richard J Foster:
* Celebration of Discipline
* Prayer

I think C.S. Lewis is a great author and very much orthodox in a broader sense. I like the books you mentioned above. I'm not familiar with Foster though. Maybe a brother/sister can give more details.
 
Upvote 0

rusmeister

A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
Dec 9, 2005
10,541
5,307
Eastern Europe
Visit site
✟493,094.00
Country
Montenegro
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Lewis is a hero of mine, and it is specifically thanks to him that I became Orthodox. So while some of his ideas may not be completely Orthodox (I don't know which) and a few of his church references obviously point to high Anglican, it's not worth raising hackles over. Every time I go back to his works I get re-inspired in my struggle to live the Christian life.
I think Mary's probably right. If he had lived down to today he probably would be Orthodox now, if for no other reason than that even the Anglican church is going modern world (acceptance of homosexuality, women in the priesthood, etc).
There's a difference between worshipping a man and admiring him. He is surely worthy of admiration.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.