We may be forgetting that because something feel pain does not mean it is suffering. Suffering is a congnitive experience.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Um no... but one does hope you don't go to the extremes some people do over plants and/or animals. we do have a responsibility to take care of them and use them wisely both for aesthetics and things that are needed.LOVEthroughINTELLECT said:As others debate things like animal rights, vegan diets, the intrinsic value of non-human animals, the absurdity of saving a house pet before saving a fellow human, etc., am I the only one who observes that we are neglecting plants?
I only have minimal education in biology, so I can't win an argument about physiology or anything like that. Some people will predictably say that something about plant physiology--something like, say, the lack of a nervous system--means that plants don't have feelings and that that is the end of the discussion. But is it really that simple?
Feelings or no feelings, nervous system or no nervous system, a house plant that is dying from dehydration has the appearance of suffering.
Maybe it's just me, but I can't look at the mold, fungus, etc. on a dying tree and not see suffering. Maybe I am fooling myself and in reality the tree doesn't know one way or the other what is happening to it. But where is it written that there has to be consciousness for there to be suffering?
Matthew 21:18-20
18 Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered. 19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away. 20 And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!
Probably.LOVEthroughINTELLECT said:I only have minimal education in biology, so I can't win an argument about physiology or anything like that. Some people will predictably say that something about plant physiology--something like, say, the lack of a nervous system--means that plants don't have feelings and that that is the end of the discussion. But is it really that simple?
Actually there are a couple of hoaxed articles that float around the internet suggesting just that thing. You might be referring to this one:ChristianCenturion said:Didn't some scientists or study come out with an article some time ago declaring or suggesting that plants show what could be reaction to pain or adverse stimulus similar to other animals?
That one is a hoax, and I think its intended as satire. See petv.org for one incarnation of the story, see this incarnation, and this "serious" incarnation.DALLAS--Research scientists at Baylor Medical Center have proven that plants, including vegetables, feel pain when subjected to trauma such as being yanked out of the ground, peeled, cooked, and eaten. "Veggies and plants initiate a massive hormone and chemical barrage internally when they suffer any kind of injury," says Professor Barry Lindzer. "This response is akin to the nerve response and endorphin release when an animal is injured. We cannot ignore the similarities."
Isnt that a contradiction in the basic meaning of sentience (which means the ability to feel and percieve)?krimsondraegon said:Non-sentient beings can feel pain.
See Guidelines for recognition and assement of animal pain.What is required to feel pain?
FSTDT said:Isnt that a contradiction in the basic meaning of sentience (which means the ability to feel and percieve)?
See Guidelines for recognition and assement of animal pain.
See also Can animals feel pain.
Do plants suffer?
LOVEthroughINTELLECT said:As others debate things like animal rights, vegan diets, the intrinsic value of non-human animals, the absurdity of saving a house pet before saving a fellow human, etc., am I the only one who observes that we are neglecting plants?
I only have minimal education in biology, so I can't win an argument about physiology or anything like that. Some people will predictably say that something about plant physiology--something like, say, the lack of a nervous system--means that plants don't have feelings and that that is the end of the discussion. But is it really that simple?
Feelings or no feelings, nervous system or no nervous system, a house plant that is dying from dehydration has the appearance of suffering.
Maybe it's just me, but I can't look at the mold, fungus, etc. on a dying tree and not see suffering. Maybe I am fooling myself and in reality the tree doesn't know one way or the other what is happening to it. But where is it written that there has to be consciousness for there to be suffering?
Ledifni said:Must something be "written" to be true? Prophecy is not the way we determine truth.
Ledifni said:In any case, if you want to see some practical proof that you are wrong, go watch a surgery. Why does the patient not suffer (and if you ask the patient afterwards, he'll tell you that he didn't suffer anything while he was in surgery)? Because he is not conscious. Suffering is a state of a conscious mind, not an objective quality of an object.