Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Assess the facts presented by both sides and decide for yourself. You've made conclusions on the Tea Party, even though you are not a member. So too, you can make conclusions on Masonry from the facts presented.
1. Albion denies there are penalties in the obligations of the degrees, even though the same ritual containing them refers to them as such in the discussion concerning temperance. Too, the EA sign (hand across the throat) is also in reference to those penalties. These are facts that you can research and confirm yourself; thus, you can determine for yourself who is telling the truth.
3. Simpleman25 claims that the EA candidates in his jurisdiction have seen the EA ritual and have been coached by a lodge member to memorized their parts in the upcoming degree. In fact, candidates never see the ritual of the degree before hand unless they look it up online themselves. I've never heard of a lodge that showed a candidate a cipher ritual (i.e., a ritual book written in simple code) before his degree work nor would any other Mason on this forum state that happens in their jurisdiction. What Simpleman25 refers to occurs after the degree work, in which the man must recite from memory key parts of the degree, often including the obligation. As above, you now have two different statements that you can assess, two different views that you can believe or not believe. What will you do?
While you are at it, ask him on what basis he refers to EMFJ as a cult.
See for yourself what facts he has based that charge on and how forthcoming he is to support his claims.
The internet has made ignorance unforgiveable, as the truth, which rarely hides, but is often obfuscated, is far more available to its seeker.
Beyond that, consider why Albion and Simpleman25 are acting in such a manner. I think it is by design, and the Masons on this forum have decided that refusal to discuss these matters isn't working, so they are concentrating on destroying my credibility.
"Cornerstone Ministries, Fayetteville, NC, research, writing & teaching about cults and false religions (i.e., non-Christian), and my income from it averaged $0.00 per month, which is the norm for my ministry work."
It's all over the internet that your address is the same as their address. If that can be explained, please do so and settle this for us. What is YOUR organization's registered address, if not their address?. And how can you use their name, even if the address is different.
Actually, there is hardly anything that IS secret, and certainly not the ritual. Masonic organizations have filmed them and distributed these films through the History Channel, for example. I can think of only a few words that are actually what might be called secret...and that has had nothing to do with Skip's demands. What Simpleman wrote is what Simpleman experienced, and what I wrote is what I experienced, but Skip has already decided what he wants for an answer. That he accuses both Simpleman and myself of lies when there have been none is, of course, regrettable.If the rituals are secret they are not going to post them online which suggests that what I might find online comes from sources hostile to the Masons and therefore suspect.
I think there is more than one Cornerstone Ministry in Fayetteville. One appears to be a black church. Judging by his politics, Skip Sampson is white. I guessing Skip Sampson's 'organization' bears the same name because it is basically a one-man operation which operates out of his home. He probably named it that when he lived in Virginia and didn't change it when he moved to Fayetteville although another group bears that name there.
I don't think Skip wants people to realize that his "organization" is really just a personal obsession.
Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170.
The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
Yeah, I sort of figured that the differences in what the two of you stated was because different Lodges did it a little differently.
Hmmm. Here's what IRS says about such organizations:
People are claiming Biblical Christianity.
Were that the case, you'd have answered mine, as I had asked you about your jurisdiction some time ago. Yet another opportunity for you to live up to your own rules.Albion said:In my online experience, it's understood that questions are taken in order.
Well, I can help you out there.I am first now trying to find out who this person is who runs a one-man non-profit organization but spends no or almost no money on the purpose for that organization to exist...an organization that you say--and your press releases--say has the address and name of a functioning church, but which has no connection to you (so you have said). You do not even reveal your church affiliation, yet your tax-supported pastime is lecturing people that your version of Christianity is the true one. Yes, I'd like to have answers.
Ok. My explanation is this: you don't know how to make effective internet searches, nor do you know how to assess the results.It's all over the internet that your address is the same as their address. If that can be explained, please do so and settle this for us.
Well, let's see: you stated that the church's address is the same as that of my ministry, then turn around and ask me what my address is. And you fail to see how silly that looks? You don't strike me as a very introspective person. As to my address, you'll have to find that out on your own. I will give you a hint, though: it's in Fayetteville, NC.What is YOUR organization's registered address, if not their address?
Easy: it's not just their name. Do another internet search and see how many there are out there. Perhaps you will achieve some measure of enlightenment.And how can you use their name, even if the address is different.
Nope.Are you ordained?
Might be due to deficiencies in your math skills. Why not? You've already shown deficiencies in logic, reason, research and analysis.there's plenty about it that frankly doesn't appear to add up.
The only insults here are those to our intelligence by the contents of your posts. I'd be embarrassed to have written such garbage, but then my standards are far higher than yours.I'm willing to suffer such insults in order to get to the truth of this matter.
How can you make such conclusions since you are not a member? My point was this: you make conclusions based on the facts as you perceive them, as do we all. I do not have to be a Mason to know what it teaches.smaneck said:I make my conclusions regarding the Tea Party based on the posters they carry and the candidates they support.
Masons keep telling me they are not. Many of the rituals I own were sold to me by Grand Lodges. The only secret parts therein deal with certain words, modes of recognition and so forth.If the rituals are secret
I have every reason to think he has done so. I guess you aren't going to ask him about his charges of me belonging to a cult.Simpleman is in a better position to know what is done in his lodge and I have no reason to think he would lie.
No.Would you consider my religion a 'cult'?
How true, and Simpleman25 and Albion are counting on it.Therefore it is not so easy to refute misinformation.
What I said is this:Seems to me you were the one who called Simpleman a liar.
Have you noted how the other Masons have avoided comment on his claim? Rather telling, I'd say. I hope Simpleman25 knows what happens to liars when they die. Cordially, Skip.Skip said:If I am right, and no lodge has an EA candidate memorize his obligation before he is initiated, that would make Simpleman a liar.
Gracious. Americanvet weighs in and you can do nothing but insult him. Is that how your religion teaches you to treat those of different beliefs?smaneck said:Seriously, in my experience it is the kind of Christianity that would have us living in the second century when women were subordinate to men, when slavery was okay, etc.
How can you make such conclusions since you are not a member? My point was this: you make conclusions based on the facts as you perceive them, as do we all. I do not have to be a Mason to know what it teaches.
Many of the rituals I own were sold to me by Grand Lodges.
The only secret parts therein deal with certain words, modes of recognition and so forth.
I have every reason to think he has done so. I guess you aren't going to ask him about his charges of me belonging to a cult.
What I said is this:Have you noted how the other Masons have avoided comment on his claim? Rather telling, I'd say.
Gracious. Americanvet weighs in and you can do nothing but insult him. Is that how your religion teaches you to treat those of different beliefs?
Seriously, you have no clue as to what Biblical Christianity teaches.
OK. That was answered before.1. The person running it is me.
I never asked if you spent any money on your "ministry." I asked what you did with the income ("No one would maintain such an organization except for the financial benefits...but you don't spend any [or is it 'little'?]. You can't just stockpile contributions for no purpose as I understand tax-free organizations.")2. I never said I spent no money on my ministry; rather, I said I had no income from it. You really should stick to the facts, for a change.
Then some have been issued for you.3. I have issued no press releases.
I didn't say that you did.4. I have not claimed that my ministry has the same address as a church in Fayetteville.
It would have taken you fewer keystrokes just to answer, rather than avoiding an answer.5. My church affiliation is posted on this forum. Maybe one of your friends will help you look it up.
You have a tax-exempted, federally recognized organization that amounts to you alone, and you don't consider that to be taxpayer-supported?4. It's neither tax-supported nor a pastime. A little effective research on your part.... oh, never mind.
I was giving you the opportunity to settle the matter rather than simply make accusations, as you do, and refuse all answers.Well, let's see: you stated that the church's address is the same as that of my ministry, then turn around and ask me what my address is.
That wasn't in question. It whether or not it's the same as the church in Fayetteville by that name.I will give you a hint, though: it's in Fayetteville, NC.
In Fayetteville, NC? I doubt that there are more, but again you prefer to avoid answering. And considering the stream of insults and accusations you closed your post with, I'm interpreting that to mean you've ended the dialogue.Easy: it's not just their name. Do another internet search and see how many there are out there.
And BTW I don't need to wear merit badges and a little scarf around my neck to be a Mason.
Ah, you know full well what Biblical Christianity is. It is my Christianity versus your Christianity.
Okay, not mine because I'm a Baha'i. But you get the picture.
Seriously, in my experience it is the kind of Christianity that would have us living in the second century when women were subordinate to men, when slavery was okay, etc. I say second century, rather than first century because they are largely relying on those texts of the NT that weren't written until the second century.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?