Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not all lives do the same thing at the same capacity.
Human (no clothes) can tolerate temperature change of 40°C, rock can take about 250°C, but not more.
lmao. I can't believe the argument about rock life is still in full swing.
Juve, do rocks have a metabolism? no? then they aren't alive.
/argument.
Seriously, this is perhaps the silliest argument I have ever seen an adult make. You simply must be pulling our legs.
With that kind of definition, as it pertains to rock, it could apply to virtually anything. In fact, most of your argument about rock life, with your loose definitions, could apply to anything...like dead bodies. So by your rationale, even DEAD is ALIVE.
You couldn't be more wrong.
A chemical reaction is not controlled by the rock. There is no change in the rock which causes the reaction. It is the reaction which causes the change.
Besides, your definition means that an ice cube is alive because it can melt. Clearly ridiculous.
You mean don't ask you not to ignore the truth?????? You mean don't bring up data that falsifies the theory of evolution so you can continue in your Fairie Dust religious beliefs??????
If you can't handle the science then why are you discussing claimed evolution?
So you want me to ignore the data too along with you?
And when a human is overheated like this, his/her body starts making changes to maintain a constant internal environment.
Show me how a rock does this.
Not at 100 degrees Celsius.
It starts to sweat.
alive: have physical and chemical activities.
Car: a life.
Yes, chemical reactions ARE controlled by the rock. If A changed to B chemically, both A and B controlled the reaction.
I said the argument would be deeper than what you can handle. I suggest you to stop this line of argument.
ANd they do not need to be alive in order to do that.
You have no idea what you are talking about. It is a straightforward chemical reaction that requires no effort on the part of the rock. Just because A and B are involved, it does not mean they are actually CONTROLLING the reaction and dictating what changes are occurring.
A person, on the other hand, has hormones regulating different processes in the body, which the rock does not have.
If a rock behaved like a snake (on body temperature change), would you suspect that the rock is alive.
If a rock behaved like a snake (on body temperature change), would you suspect that the rock is alive.
No, if a rock had that one criteria covered it would still not be alive or considered "life".
Recall the list of criteria KTS provided the other week on how "life" is defined.
It's really very easy. Life either meets all those criteria & without exception all of them, else if, not life. Duh.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?