• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,885
22,563
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟598,222.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Well, obviously, the fact that the launched a court case asking for money.
Maybe we're looking at different Wikipedia articles, but in mine, they didn't ask for money, they asked for the return of the land.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,865
✟344,561.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Maybe we're looking at different Wikipedia articles, but in mine, they didn't ask for money, they asked for the return of the land.

The article United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians - Wikipedia describes a successful 1980 court action by the Sioux nation that asked for money.

... and that's all I'm going to say about it, because it's a substantial thread derail for an Australian and a German to be talking on SCOTUS cases on this thread.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,723
5,060
✟1,022,905.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

MorkandMindy

Andrew Yang's Forward Party
Site Supporter
Dec 16, 2006
7,401
785
New Mexico
✟265,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The article United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians - Wikipedia describes a successful 1980 court action by the Sioux nation that asked for money.

... and that's all I'm going to say about it, because it's a substantial thread derail for an Australian and a German to be talking on SCOTUS cases on this thread.

No problem, this whole thread went of the rails way back but it's a pretty good thread on the Electoral College.

But I do just want to say one more on topic thing ...
Not a Democrat or a Republican Mug.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radagast
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
28,079
19,709
Colorado
✟548,894.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
There's nothing wrong with supporting R or D parties in a system that rationally games out to a 2 party contest.

If we want more parties (and I do) then we need to change one or both of:
1-the election/voting tabulation system (some form of ranked-choice)
2-the composition of congress (at least one chamber thats national party-slate proportional)

My sense is 1 is much much more palatable to the public generally, even if the two parties fight it tooth and nail.
 
Upvote 0