Do American voters need more 2024 choices?

[Fantine]

Thanks for the stats, Mark. They are very close.

 

[mark46]

Unless Republican candidates become much more vocal, Trump will win the nomination while under house arrest. or at very least awaiting trial in several cases.

There could be many more than we have so far. The documents case could have charges in NJ state courts. The fake electors case could be tried in Michigan, and even in AZ, NV and PA state courts.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Unless Republican candidates become much more vocal, Trump will win the nomination while under house arrest. or at very least awaiting trial in several cases.

There could be many more than we have so far. The documents case could have charges in NJ state courts. The fake electors case could be tried in Michigan, and even in AZ, NV and PA state courts.

Which is insane, right?

 

[GodLovesCats]

Nope, nope. Biden is too old, too bland, and too vulnerable to foot-in-mouth disease.

If you want to criticize a person of having FIMD, the perfect guy for that is Donald Trump.

His favorability/unfavorability ratings have been running just about neck and neck with Trump lately.

Totally meaningless statistics. Only the votes matter because all other polls have error margins.

 

[Yttrium]

If you want to criticize a person of having FIMD, the perfect guy for that is Donald Trump.

No, I think Trump has a much worse problem...

And I'll stick to the FIMD for Biden.

 

[inquiring mind]

It’s like God is saying to us, you’re in a terrible mess… can’t you see what a truly poor choice does to your nation? I allowed this dumpster fire the past couple of years so you would see what happens when strong and wise leadership doesn’t prevail. Now, I’m presenting you with a gift election for 2024, which should be a no-brainer, and what do you do… look a gift horse in the mouth and like a dog return to his vomit.

 

[Diamond72]

Any president would be lucky to have their support.

What is difficult to sweep under the carpet is that 5 presidents supported each other. I would agree that out of those five Obama was the most intelligent, but that does not make him the best. At least not for Syria or Ukraine. Also, I am sure Daddy Bush was still running the country, even though Bush Jr was in office. You see in the photo Bush and Obama talking and the other three little more than a bump on a log. During the war with Iraq, Bush had an 85% approval rating. Obama to this day still refers to Joe as the Vice President. I still remember when there was only 1,000 votes between Al Gore and Bush in Flordia. Even Hillary and Trump was very close and somehow Trump manages to sneak in some back country votes to win the election.

 

[Diamond72]

It’s like God is saying to us, you’re in a terrible mess… can’t you see what a truly poor choice does to your nation?

There is no good choice. We will rule and reign with Jesus for 1,000 years. That is the right choice.

 

[inquiring mind]

Bill is the most intelligent in that group.

 

[inquiring mind]

There is no good choice. We will rule and reign with Jesus for 1,000 years. That is the right choice.

But, that is not politics. The Bible differentiates and so should we.

 

[Diamond72]

But, that is not politics. The Bible differentiates and so should we.

In 1Samual8
God responded to Samuel, saying that the Israelites had rejected Him as their king by asking for a human ruler. However, God instructed Samuel to listen to their request and warn the people about the consequences of having a king. God told Samuel to make it clear to the people that a king would demand taxes, conscript their sons for military service, and take their resources for his own purposes.

Despite the warnings, the people insisted on having a king. Only now we have a president.

 

[inquiring mind]

In 1Samual8
God responded to Samuel, saying that the Israelites had rejected Him as their king by asking for a human ruler. However, God instructed Samuel to listen to their request and warn the people about the consequences of having a king. God told Samuel to make it clear to the people that a king would demand taxes, conscript their sons for military service, and take their resources for his own purposes.

Despite the warnings, the people insisted on having a king. Only now we have a president.

I bet Saul was a Democrat.

 

[Always in His Presence]

IMHO Joe Biden is not fit to be elected dog catcher. The stray dogs deserve better.

I would hope both he and Trump would not be in the race, but that is unlikely to happen.

 

[Truth7t7]

Heard this discussion on polling yesterday.

When polled, most voters say Trump is "criminal," Biden is "old," and DeSantis is "fascist."

Do you, too, feel like we need better choices?

While I would choose the "old" candidate from those three, the other two terrify me.

Where are the knights (or ladies) riding in on a white charger to rescue us?

I think conservative voters need at least three more choices, Trump, Trump, And More Trump

Trump 2024 "Make America Great Again"!

 

[Truth7t7]

IMHO Joe Biden is not fit to be elected dog catcher. The stray dogs deserve better.

I Agree 100%, a big understatement!

 

[WolfGate]

We have better choices. The Republicans have several running that want to focus on policy and issues while being conservative (meant in the Reagan vein). The problem is the populist wing of the GOP is strongly behind Trump and their only potential fallback is Desantis. The irony if the GOP's main goal is to take the White House is some of those candidates have almost no chance of getting the nomination but would win against Biden easily, while Trump is likely to lose again.

The Democrats could have a better candidate, but nobody who fits is entering the race. As long as the GOP seems bent of nominating Trump, which will play very poorly with swing voters, there is no reason for them to run. The Democrats are going to take the most likely path to the White House, even with a poor choice.

To answer your question indirectly, the GOP needs to settle this battle of what they are going to be - populist or conservative. Currently with Trump as their actual leader, the populist group is in control and if it stays that way, then yes, we need better choices. Otherwise there are some really good ones already running.

 

[Truth7t7]

Trump is likely to lose again.

Trump didn't lose in 2020, the election was stolen who you kidding

Just A Few Dishonorable Mentions:

1.) Ruby Freeman in Atlanta is the prime example, counting ballots multiple times after republican poll watchers were sent home for a supposed water leak, all recorded on camera and time dated for the world to see?

2.) Drop box ballot harvesting, Dinesh De Souza and 2,000 mules tells the story?

Voter Integrity Group Concludes Up to 4.8 Million Ballots Cast Illegally in 2020 Harvesting Scheme​

3.) Joe Biden in his own words stated?

"We have put together the most extensive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"

4.) Mark Zuckerbucks giving $419 Million$ to control vote counting in key crucial cities in swing states?

 

[Truth7t7]

There is no good choice. We will rule and reign with Jesus for 1,000 years. That is the right choice.

No such thing as a Millennial reign found in the Bible, it's a fabricated fairy tale of man

 

[Yttrium]

We have better choices. The Republicans have several running that want to focus on policy and issues while being conservative (meant in the Reagan vein). The problem is the populist wing of the GOP is strongly behind Trump and their only potential fallback is Desantis. The irony if the GOP's main goal is to take the White House is some of those candidates have almost no chance of getting the nomination but would win against Biden easily, while Trump is likely to lose again.

Nikki Haley could beat biden. Seriously, easy win. I'd expect a bunch of Democrats to cross over and vote for her.

Trump didn't lose in 2020, the election was stolen who you kidding

No such thing as a Millennial reign found in the Bible, it's a fabricated fairy tale of man

Impressive double beehive smack!

 

[Diamond72]

No such thing as a Millennial reign found in the Bible, it's a fabricated fairy tale of man

I said: We will rule and reign with Christ for 1000 years. The Bible says: "They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years". Revelation 20:4 Are you upset because I changed the word "life" to "rule"? It was just a paraphrase. You can look the scripture up for yourself. The verse goes on to say: "But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection."

You can interpret it anyway you want.