Agree.Yeah.
School
to learn the difference between a press release and a scientific, peer reviewed article?School
A good press article on what scientists on the cutting edge are working on and claiming is fine and dandy for a forum on science, where issues should be discussed, and the basis of claims looked at. Now if you had a portion of some 'peer reviewed' article you think would add to the discussion and scientific news article, it would be incumbent on you to provide it. Otherwise you have nothing to say...and say...and say...and say... there comes a time when posters here should do more than bray like a donkey.to learn the difference between a press release and a scientific, peer reviewed article?
In school they teach stuff. Here you should post stuff. Topical stuff. Interesting stuff. Stuff from the losing side of the argument you are on here.School
But The HI Theoory doesn't discuss anything. It just makes stuff up andA good press article on what scientists on the cutting edge are working on and claiming is fine and dandy for a forum on science, where issues should be discussed, and the basis of claims looked at. Now if you had a portion of some 'peer reviewed' article you think would add to the discussion and scientific news article, it would be incumbent on you to provide it. Otherwise you have nothing to say...and say...and say...and say... there comes a time when posters here should do more than bray like a donkey.
The science articles quote the teams and scientists involved in the various studies. They usually dissemilate the information to us in a way that the average person has some hope of comprehending. The pious peer review process of science papers perhaps would be permissible here if the poster presented their position on the paper in a way that was perceptively proper, not pretentious preaching, or POEing in a predictable way.But The HI Theoory doesn't discuss anything. It just makes stuff up ands away everything else.
Which has nothing to do with The HI Theory.The science articles quote the teams and scientists involved in the various studies.
Which has nothing to do with The HI Theory.They usually dissemilate the information to us in a way that the average person has some hope of comprehending.
Which has nothing to do with science.The pious peer review process of science papers
Which is exactly what The HI Theory is all about!perhaps would be permissible here if the poster presented their position on the paper in a way that was perceptively proper, not pretentious preaching, or POEing in a predictable way.
A good press article on what scientists on the cutting edge are working on and claiming is fine and dandy for a forum on science, where issues should be discussed, and the basis of claims looked at. Now if you had a portion of some 'peer reviewed' article you think would add to the discussion and scientific news article, it would be incumbent on you to provide it. Otherwise you have nothing to say...and say...and say...and say... there comes a time when posters here should do more than bray like a donkey.
The articles on news sites I referred to ARE science actually. This thread exposes the idiocy of their claims, like in today's news.Which has nothing to do with The HI Theory.
Which has nothing to do with The HI Theory.
Which has nothing to do with science.
Which is exactly what The HI Theory is all about!![]()
Better...so?? We want to look at the latest science studies and cases, and research here, and get into why the claims are made. We are not looking for Tweedledee to rubber stamp Tweedledum's short story with good grades!A good press release is not a peer reviewed journal article.
.The OP is not dissecting an actual science article, it's commenting on a press release.