Dissecting an actual science article

[Speedwell]

what does this have to do with the issue of you answering what God was doing in your fable of creation by speck!? Should we take it that you think He possessed the hot soup speck and made it pop out all that is the universe today or something?? Be clear...no matter how ridiculous your position may be.

What do you know about the metaphysics of causality? God is the Formal and the Final cause. The Material and Efficient causes He leaves to science to find out about.

So the odd appearance in our affairs eh?

You think miracles are odd? That's s strange position for a Christian.

Ha. Not a real personal Friend and God. Sounds more like a pipe dream.

I doubt you know very much about personal friendship, but that's OK--Jesus loves you anyway.

So the one that raised from the dead was not the One that created the world and all things as John says?

What I was taught is that God the Father created the universe through God the Son. What you're talking about is called Modal Monarchianism which has been an heresy since the second century.

Let me guess, you can't quite say what!!!!!? Like your post clearly shows. I double dare you...

You jumped all over the authors of that paper for assuming the Principle of Uniformity as if they must be taking it on faith rather than relying, as they should, on the work of other scientists whose specific business it is.

 

[AirPo]

So that is your best attempt at addressing how we know what the laws were when the meteors crashed, or rock melted on Mercury, or etc. OK. Very good try, don't be discouraged.

Of course not. This thread is not about addressing anything. It's about making things up.

 

[dad]

What do you know about the metaphysics of causality?

What did Peter know? Why toss out meaningless terms.

God is the Formal and the Final cause. The Material and Efficient causes He leaves to science to find out about.
You think miracles are odd?

What obfuscating baloney. We do not look for 'miracles' for some invented baseless fable especially when it opposes Scripture.

That's s strange position for a Christian.I doubt you know very much about personal friendship, but that's OK--Jesus loves you anyway.

He called us friends. Those who know Him know He tells the truth.

What I was taught is that God the Father created the universe through God the Son. What you're talking about is called Modal Monarchianism which has been an heresy since the second century.

More idiotic terms. I am talking about belief versus unbelief. Trust in God over self and man.

You jumped all over the authors of that paper for assuming the Principle of Uniformity as if they must be taking it on faith rather than relying, as they should, on the work of other scientists whose specific business it is.

If you or they want to show that work, feel free. If you had a clue what you were talking about you would know they can't, nor you.

 

[dad]

Of course not. This thread is not about addressing anything. It's about making things up.

Yes we see your trip.

 

[AirPo]

Yes we see your trip.

And we see yours.

 

[AirPo]

What did Peter know? Why toss out meaningless terms.

ing QED

What obfuscating baloney.

More ing

We do not look for 'miracles' for some invented baseless fable especially when it opposes Scripture.

We don't, but you base the entire HI Theory on it.

He called us friends. Those who know Him know He tells the truth.
More idiotic terms.

Agreed

I am talking about belief versus unbelief. Trust in God over self and man.

There are some folks here who are not afraid to say that up front.

If you or they want to show that work, feel free. If you had a clue what you were talking about you would know they can't, nor you.

Actually, we all have a clue about what you're talking about. If you had a clue about what you were talking about you would know it's clueless.

 

[[serious]]

There's a problem with assuming physical records of the past are not accurate

No there isn't.

Yes there is times 100?

 

[dad]

And we see yours.

In this thread, my trip is discussing the basis for modelling the past regarding Mercury, and crater density, and rock melt temp etc etc. Looking at science articles. Not like anyone can dispute that they claim what they claim for the reasons they claim it. Then we have the spammers and time wasters who are sore losers and cannot grasp the issues.

 

[dad]

ing QED
More ing
We don't, but you base the entire HI Theory on it.
Agreed
There are some folks here who are not afraid to say that up front.
Actually, we all have a clue about what you're talking about. If you had a clue about what you were talking about you would know it's clueless.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160627132939.htm

"The team melted the synthetic rocks in a furnace to simulate the point in time when the deposits were lava, and not yet solidified as rock. Then, the researchers dialed the temperature and pressure of the furnace up and down to effectively turn back the clock, simulating the lava's eruption from deep within the planet to the surface, in reverse...

..The experiments indicate that the planet's interior cooled dramatically, over 240 degrees Celsius between 4.2 and 3.7 billion years ago -"

Hilarious!!!

Did we consider creation? What happened when God created the planet? Did anything liquefy or melt? Everything about the so called science claim here shouts religion.

 

[dad]

Yes there is times 100?

Times that by 10, to the 100,000,000th power times infinity.

 

[AirPo]

In this thread, my trip is discussing the basis for modelling the past regarding Mercury, and crater density, and rock melt temp etc etc. Looking at science articles. Not like anyone can dispute that they claim what they claim for the reasons they claim it. Then we have the spammers and time wasters who are sore losers and cannot grasp the issues.

You don't discuss anything.

Hilarious!!!

is not discussing, it's ing.

QED.

 

[dad]

You don't discuss anything.



is not discussing, it's ing.

QED.

With you, no. Obviously. You would need to contribute.

 

[[serious]]

Times that by 10, to the 100,000,000th power times infinity.

Yeah, but that post was in the past. How do we know the past really happened?

 

[AirPo]

With you, no. Obviously. You would need to contribute.

It's a thread about nothing, like a bad episode of Seinfeld.

 

[dad]

It's a thread about nothing, like a bad episode of Seinfeld.

Regarding the way science determines when meteors on Mercury hit and when rock there melted, then, your opinion is..?

 

[dad]

Yeah, but that post was in the past. How do we know the past really happened?

In science they simply assume and believe it was a certain way, they don't know.

 

[[serious]]

In science they simply assume and believe it was a certain way, they don't know.

Like we just assume that last tuesday happened?

 

[[serious]]

Science: Only as reliable as the existence of last Tuesday.

 

[dad]

Like we just assume that last tuesday happened?

One can assume what one wants, however, one would need evidence if one called it a science claim.

There is a spirit behind anti Christ science you know. I see it raise it's head once in awhile. Here are some scientists at Cern getting into it..
"
Fake human sacrifice filmed at Cern, with pranking scientists suspected
The video, which circulated online, shows several individuals in black cloaks gathering in a main square at Europe’s top physics lab, in what appears to be a re-enactment of an occult ceremony.

The video includes the staged “stabbing” of a woman. It is filmed from the perspective of a secret viewer watching from a window above who, as the ceremony reaches its climax, lets out a string of expletives and flees with the camera still running.

The ceremony appears to have been staged in front of a statue of the Hindu deity Shiva that is on permanent display at the complex, home of the Large Hadron Collider."
https://www.theguardian.com/science...ed-at-cern-with-pranking-scientists-suspected

 

[AirPo]

Regarding the way science determines when meteors on Mercury hit and when rock there melted, then, your opinion is..?

That you don't care one bit about when meteors hit Mercury or what happened when they did.