Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wow. After hundreds of years worth of human scientific endeavor, I would have thought people would know the difference between evidence and hypothesis.Sorry what u call evidence is a hypothesis. Its one in a million guesses how it started.
No, you really do not. You may have more faith in God's existence than mine but that does not help you in an argument. In fact faith based beliefs can be proven to be wrong most of the time. Faith is not a pathway to the truth.We have more evidence for God than for your existence.
I'll make it simple for you: Scientists have no answers as to how the universe began because they can't test something that isn't testable. This doesn't stop them from throwing out theories as if they were facts. And for some reason, people are gullible enough to just accept the theories....I wana discuss with atheists how this universe came into existence. Please keep it simple and easy to understand as i wana see the atheistic perspective. Maybe i got it wrong and maybe you are right. I want to keep it as honest, rational and easy as possible. I personally think God is the best explanation for this organised universe not a random process. Now how is evolution or some other explanation more logical?
The writers of that "book" do not understand the concept of evidence.Can you provide any evidence that the universe always existed? There is evidence that God exists. https://www.crediblecatholic.com/pdf/7E-P2/7E-LB1.pdf
You have that backwards. An idea is not a scientific theory until it has been shown to be a fact. Theories explain facts.I'll make it simple for you: Scientists have no answers as to how the universe began because they can't test something that isn't testable. This doesn't stop them from throwing out theories as if they were facts. And for some reason, people are gullible enough to just accept the theories....
This is, of course, false.I'll make it simple for you: Scientists have no answers as to how the universe began because they can't test something that isn't testable. This doesn't stop them from throwing out theories as if they were facts. And for some reason, people are gullible enough to just accept the theories....
So glad that I did not use an ellipsis tooThis is, of course, false.
At present there is no theory for what happened before the big bang. There is some conjecture based on some mathematical modeling based on works by Einstein and Hawking and others, but nothing that can be defined as a theory.
But here's the thing, unlike creationists who think they know everything or have an answer for everything (god-did-it), science is perfectly okay with saying "we don't know that ... yet".
It is ONLY creationists who claim that if science doesn't know EVERYTHING then science knows NOTHING and is therefore invalid.
Um, no, it's not a fact if you can not replicate it. It's a guess. And the current guess about a speck of infinite energy sure sounds like God as the first cause.You have that backwards. An idea is not a scientific theory until it has been shown to be a fact. Theories explain facts.
Must ... type ... faster.So glad that I did not use an ellipsis too. I was tempted.
How many times do you think a fossil needs to be looked before everyone says "yep, it's a fact. That is definitely a fossil."?Um, no, it's not a fact if you can not replicate it. It's a guess. And the current guess about a speck of infinite energy sure sounds like God as the first cause.
To you.The big bang itself isn't proven..
One does not need to replicate events for them not to be a guess. By your standards most convicted murderers should be set free.Um, no, it's not a fact if you can not replicate it. It's a guess. And the current guess about a speck of infinite energy sure sounds like God as the first cause.
By a legal standard it is.The big bang itself isn't proven..
Sure it is.The big bang itself isn't proven..
Which specific theory of cosmology are incorrectly thrown out as if fact?This doesn't stop them from throwing out theories as if they were facts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?